Computer-based concept mapping: Promoting meaningful learning in science for students with disabilities

Information Technology and Disabilities

Volumn 5, Issue , 1998, Pages

  Anderson Inman, Lynne ^a   Ditson, Leslie A ^a   Ditson, Mary T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b MCAT ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649083518     PISSN: 10735127     EISSN: 10735127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Abayomi, B. I. (1988). _The effects of concept mapping and cognitive style on science achievement_. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University.
2. Allen, J. D. (1989). _Effects of concept mapping on meaningful learning and achievement in chemistry_. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
3. Anderson-Inman, L. (1992). _Studying and learning with computer-based information organizers_. Symposium presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA. April.
4. Anderson-Inman, L. & Horney, M. (1996/1997). Computer-based concept mapping: Enhancing literacy with tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy. 40_, 4, 302-306.
5. Anderson-Inman, L., Knox-Quinn, C., Horney, M. A. (1996). Computer-based study strategies for students with learning disabilities: Individual differences associated with adoption level. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 29_, 5 461-484.
6. Anderson-Inman, L., & Tenny, J. (1989). Electronic studying: Information organizers to help students study "better" not "harder" - Part I. The Computing Teacher, 16_(8), 33-36.
7. Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeitz, L. (1993). Computer-based concept mapping: Active studying for active learners. _The Computing Teacher, 21_(1), 1-5.
8. Caswell, R. M., & Wendel, C. T. (1992). _Conceptual changes occurring in elementary teachers' knowledge of science concepts throughout long-term instruction._ Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, April.
9. Cohen, D. (1987). The use of concept maps to represent unique thought processes: Toward more meaningful learning. _Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2_(3), 285-289.
10. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). What we have learned and where we are headed. _A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice_. New York: Teacher College, Columbia University. Pages 215-244.
11. Ditson, L., Kessler, R., Anderson-Inman, L. & Mafit, D. (1998). _Concept mapping companion_. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
12. Driver, R. (1989). The construction of scientific knowledge in school classrooms. In Millar, R. (Ed.), _Doing science: Images of science in science education_, Falmer Press, Lewes, East Sussex, pp. 83-106.
13. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. _Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation_. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pages 1-16.
14. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Learning as a restructuring process._Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development_. Pages 96-110.
15. Fisher, K. M., Faletti, J., Patterson, H., Thornton, R., Lipson, J., & Spring, C. (1990). Computer-based concept mapping. _Journal of College Science Teachings 19(6), 347-352.
16. Gurley, L. I. (1982). _Use of Gowin's vee and concept mapping strategies to teach responsibility for learning in high school biological sciences. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
17. Heeren, E., & Kommers, P. A. M. (1992). Flexibility of expressiveness: A critical factor in the design of concept mapping tools for learning. _NATO ASI_, F(81), 85-101.
18. Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A. Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J. & Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. _Science Education_, 77(1), 95-111.
19. Inspiration, Inc. (1995). _Inspiration_ [software program]. Beaverton: OR
20. Kessler, R., Ditson, L., Anderson-Inman, L. & Morris, J. (1996). _Evaluating concept maps in traditional and electronic environments: Inter-rater reliability and beyond_. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, April.
21. Kessler, R., Ditson, L., Anderson-Inman, L. & Windham, G. (1996). _Symbol-rich concept maps: Drawing as a thinking tool in science_. Paper presented at the Nationla Science Teachers Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, December.
22. Kinnear, J., Gleeson, D, & Comerford, C. (1985). Use of concept maps in assessing the value of a computer-based activity in biology. _Research in Science Education, 15_, 103-111.
23. Kopec, D., Wood, C., & Brody, M. (1990/91). Using cognitive mapping techniques for educating about sexually transmitted diseases with an intelligent tutoring system. _Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2_(2), 67-82.
24. Kozma, R. B. (1987). The implications of cognitive psychology for computer- based learning tools. _Educational Technology, 27_(11), 20-25.
25. Lehman, J. D., Carter, C., & Kahle, J. B (1985). Concept mapping, vee mapping, and achievement: Results of a field study with black high school students. _Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22_(7), 663-673.
26. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. _Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27_(10), 937-949.
27. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Concept mapping for meaningful learning. _Learning How to Learn_. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 15-55.
28. Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. _American Educational Research Journal, 28_(1), 117-153.
29. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johannsen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. _Science Education, 27_(4), 315-333.
30. Okebukola, P.A., & Jegede, O. J. (1988). Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. _Science Education, 72_(4), 489-500.
31. Olson, J. L. (1992). _Envisioning writing: Toward an integration of drawing and writing_. Portsmouth, NH: Heinmann
32. Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. _Studies in Science Education, 12_, 59-87.
33. Pankratius, W. J. (1990). Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27_(4), 315-333.
34. Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Special Issue: Computers and Education. _Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182.
35. Prater, D. L., & Terry, C. A. (1988). Effects of mapping strategies on reading comprehension and writing performance. _Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 9_, 101-120.
36. Spaulding, D. T. (1989). Concept mapping and achievement in high school biology and chemistry. Doctoral Dissertation, Florida Institute of Technology. _Dissertation Abstracts International, 50_, 1619A.
37. Starr, M. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (1990). Concept maps as a heuristic for science curriculum development: Toward improvement in process and product. _Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27_(10), 987-1000.
38. Stensvold, M. S., & Wilson, J. T. (1990). The interaction of verbal ability with concept mapping in learning from a chemistry laboratory activity. _Science Education, 74_, 473-489.
39. Tenny, J. (1992). Computer-supported study strategies for purple people. _Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 8_, 359-377.
40. Wandersee, J. H. (1987). Drawing concept circles: A new way to teach and test students. _Science Activities, 24_(4), 1, 9-20.
41. Zeitz, L. (1992). _The effects of using computer-based formative concept mapping in a high school biology classroom_. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
42. Zeitz, L. E., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1992). _The effects of computer-based formative concept mapping on learning high school science_. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, April.