Reexploring the subconcepts of the Wittmann-Price theory of emancipated decision making in women's healthcare

Advances in Nursing Science

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 225-236

  Wittmann Price, Ruth A ^a,b   Bhattacharya, Anand ^a,b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ST LUKE S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Emancipated; Flexible environment; Personal knowledge; Social norms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FEMINISM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LABOR PAIN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSING; NURSING THEORY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FEMINISM; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LABOR PAIN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSING THEORY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENNSYLVANIA; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL VALUES; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 54549123378     PISSN: 01619268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ANS.0000334286.81354.16     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Callister LC. Editorial. J Perinat Neonat Nurs. 2005;19(2):89-90.
2. Carlton T, Callister LC, Stonerman E. Decision making in laboring women: ethical issues for perinatal nurses. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2005;19(2):145- 154.
3. Pierce P, Hicks F. Woman decision making behavior: an emerging paradigm for nursing science. Nurs Res. 2001;50:267-273.
4. Wittmann-Price RA. Emancipation in decisionmaking in women's healthcare. J Adv Nurs. 2004;47:437-445.
5. Wittmann-Price RA. Exploring the subconcepts of the Wittmann-price theory of emancipation in decision-making in women's healthcare. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2006;38:377-382.
6. Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, Rovner D, Breer L, Rothert M, et al. Woman satisfaction with healthcare decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:58-64.
7. Melnyk B, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2005.
8. Berragan L. Nursing practice draws upon several different ways of knowing. J Clin Nurs. 1998;7:209- 217.
9. National Institute of Health (NIH). Facts about menopausal hormonal therapy. NIH publication 05-5200. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/women/ pht-facts.pdf. Published June 2005. Accessed July 12, 2008.
10. August-Brady M. Flexibility: a concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2000;35:5-14.
11. Duchscher JE. Bending a habit: critical social theory as a framework for humanistic nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2000;20:453-462.
12. Arslanian-Engoren C. Feminist poststructuralism: a methodological paradigm for examining clinical decision making. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37:512-517.
13. Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Continuum International; 1970.
14. Marx K, Engels F. The German Ideology. Moscow: Progress Publishers; 1976.
15. Hegel G. Hegel, Highlights, an Annotated Selection by Wanda Orynski. New York: Philosophical Library; 1960.
16. Habermas J. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. London: Heinemann; 1969.
17. Perry P. Feminist empiricism as a method for inquiry in nursing. West J Nurs Res. 1994;16:480-494.
18. Freire P. The Pedagogy of Hope. New York: The Continuum International; 1992.
19. Freire P. Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare Teach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1998.
20. Konding K. Decision theory: what "should" the nervous system do? Science. 2007;26(318):606-610.
21. Bandura A. Social Foundations ofThought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
22. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
23. Humphreys A, Thompson N, Miner K. Assessment of breastfeeding intention using the transtheoretical model and the theory of reasoned action. Health Educ Res Theory Pract. 1998;13:331-341.
24. Janis I, Mann L. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment .New York: Free Press; 1977.
25. O'Connor A, Jacobson M, Stacey D. An evidenced- based approach managing women's decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31:570-581.
26. Rothert M, O'Connor A. Health decisions and decision support for women. Nurs Res. 2001;50:267- 274.
27. O'Connor A, Stacy D. Ottawa Personal Decision Guide. Ottawa, Canada: Ottawa Health research Institute, University of Ottawa; 2006.
28. Green JM, Baston HA. Have women become more willing to accept obstetrical interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study. Birth. 2007;34(1):6-13.
29. Nystedt A, Edvardsson D, William A. Epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour and childbirth-a review with a systematic approach. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13:455-466.
30. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd. ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum; 1988.
31. Leech NC, Barrett KC, Morgan GA. SPSSforInterme- diate Statistics. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erl- baum; 2005.
32. Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post- Critical Philosophy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1958.
33. Pritchard J. Strengthening women's health visiting work with women. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(3):236-244.
34. Sedlak C, Dohenym M, Estok P, Zeller R. Tailored interventions to enhance osteoporosis prevention in women. OrthopNurs. 2005;24(4):270-278.
35. Williams PL, Innis SM, Vogel AMP, Stephen LJ. Factors influencing infant feeding practices of mothers in Vancouver. Can J Public Health. 1997;90:114-122.
36. Milisa M. Power and empowerment in nursing: looking backward to inform the future. Online J Issues Nurs. 2007;12(1):15.
37. Wambach K, Koehn M. Experiences of infant- feeding decision-making among urban economically disadvantaged pregnant adolescents. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(4):361-370.