Centralized and decentralized process and sensor fault monitoring using data fusion based on adaptive extended Kalman filter algorithm

Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1059-1076

  Salahshoor, Karim ^a   Mosallaei, Mohsen ^a   Bayat, Mohammadreza ^b  

^a PETROLEUM UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND ROBOTICS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Adaptive modified extended Kalman filter; Continuous stirred tank reactor; Multi sensor data fusion; Output augmented fusion

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; BOOLEAN FUNCTIONS; CELLULAR RADIO SYSTEMS; CONTROL THEORY; DATA FUSION; DEGRADATION; EXTENDED KALMAN FILTERS; FUSION REACTIONS; INFORMATION FUSION; KALMAN FILTERS; POSITION CONTROL; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS ENGINEERING; PROCESS MONITORING; SENSOR NETWORKS; SENSORS; SET THEORY; TANKS (CONTAINERS); WAVE FILTERS;

ADAPTIVE; ADAPTIVE EXTENDED KALMAN FILTERS; ADAPTIVE MODIFIED EXTENDED KALMAN FILTER; ADAPTIVE PROCESS MONITORING; BENCHMARK PROBLEMS; CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURES; CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR; CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTORS; DATA FUSION ALGORITHMS; DECENTRALIZED PROCESSES; DIAGNOSE SENSORS; DISTRIBUTED INTEGRATIONS; INTEGRATED DESIGN FRAMEWORKS; INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURES; MULTI-SENSOR DATA FUSION; MULTI-SENSOR DATA FUSIONS; OUTPUT AUGMENTED FUSION; PROCESS FAULTS; SENSOR DATUM; SENSOR DEGRADATIONS; SENSOR FAULTS; SIMULATION STUDIES; VECTOR FUSIONS;

SENSOR DATA FUSION;

EID: 54549088841     PISSN: 02632241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2008.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Lee W.S., Grosh D.I., Tillman F.A., and Lie C.H. Fault tree analysis, methods and applications: a review. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-34 (1985) 194-302
2. Kramer M.A., and Palowitch Jr. B.L. A rule based approach to fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. AIChE J. 33 7 (1987) 1067-1078
3. W.L. Cao, B.S. Wang, L.Y. Ma, J. Zhang, J.Q. Gao, Fault diagnosis approach based on the integration of qualitative model and quantitative knowledge of signed directed graph, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Guangzhou, 2005, pp. 2251-2256.
4. Vaija P., Turunen I., Jarvelainen M., and Dohnal M. Fuzzy strategy for failure detection and safety control of complex processes. Microelectr. Reliab. 25 2 (1985) 369-381
5. R. Fickelsherer, D.E. Lamb, P. Dhujati, D.L. Chester, Role of dynamic simulation in developing an expert system for chemical process fault detection, in: Proceedings of the Computer Simulation Conference Society for Computer Simulation, 1986.
6. Hsu Y.-Y., and Yu C.-C. A self-learning fault diagnosis system based on reinforcement learning. Am. Chem. Soc. 31 (1992) 1937-1946
7. Isermann R. Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods, a survey. Automatica (1984) 387-404
8. Himmelblau D.M. Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Chemical and Petrochemical Processes (1978), Elsevier, Amsterdam
9. Willsky A.S. A survey of design methods for failure detection systems. Automatica (1976) 601-611
10. Maybeck P.S. Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control vols. I and II (1982), Academic Press, New York
11. Gan Q., and Harris C.J. Comparison of two measurement fusion methods for Kalman-filter-based multi-sensor data fusion. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electr. System 37 1 (2001) 273-280
12. Harris C., Hong X., and Gan Q. Adaptive Modeling, Estimation and Fusion from Data: A Neurofuzzy Approach (2001), Springer
13. Schlosser M.S., and Kroschel K. Communication issues in decentralized Kalman filters. Fusion (2004) IF04-0731
14. Luyben W.L. Process Modeling Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers. second ed. (1989), McGraw-Hill
15. Sawattanakit N., and Jaovisidha V. Process fault detection and diagnosis in CSTR system using on-line approximator. IEEE (1998) 747-750
16. Hyvarines A., and Aja E. A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Comput. 9 (1997) 1483