Using consensus methods to develop clinical practice guidelines for intensive care: The Intensive Care Collaborative project

Australian Critical Care

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 200-215

  Rolls, Kaye Denise ^a   Elliott, Doug ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clinical practice guidelines; Consensus methods; Delphi panel; Nominal group technique

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DELPHI STUDY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; NURSING CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; NEW SOUTH WALES; NURSING CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 54449094890     PISSN: 10367314     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2008.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Pogorzelska M., and Larson E.L. Assessment of attitudes of intensive care unit staff toward clinical practice guidelines. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 27 1 (2008) 30-38
2. Rolls K., Kowal D., Elliott D., and Burrell A. Building a statewide knowledge network for clinicians in intensive care units: knowledge brokering and the NSW Intensive Care Coordination and Monitoring Unit. Australian Critical Care 21 1 (2008) 27-37
3. Nagy S., Lumby J., McKinley S., and Macfarlane C. Nurses' beliefs about the conditions that hinder or support evidence-based nursing. International Journal of Nursing Practice 7 (2001) 314-321
4. Hutchinson A.M., and Johnston L. Beyond the BARRIERS scale: commonly reported barriers to research use. Journal of Nursing Administration 36 4 April (2006) 189-199 [Article]
5. Cochrane. The Cochrane Collaboration. No date [cited 8 May 2008]; Available from: http://www.cochrane.org/.
6. JBIEBNM. The Joanna Briggs Institute [cited 8 May 2008]; Available from: http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au/about/home.php.
7. NICE. Welcome to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. No date [cited 8 May 2008]; Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/.
8. SIGN. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. No date [cited 8 May 2008]; Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/index.html.
9. Rycroft-Malone J. Formal consensus: the development of a national clinical guidelines. Quality and Safety in Health Care (2001) 238-244
10. SIGN. What is SIGN-what are guidelines? 2008 [cited 9 May 2008]. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/about/introduction.html.
11. Heffner J.E. Does evidence-based medicine help the development of clinical practice guidelines. Chest 113 (1998) 172-178 Supplement
12. AGREE. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12:18-23.
13. Elliott D. Reviewing the literature. In: Whitehead Z.S., Elliott D., and LoBiondo-Wood D.G.J.H. (Eds). Nursing & midwifery research: methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. (2007), Mosby, Sydney 46-61
14. Cook D.J., Mulrow C.D., and Haynes R.B. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine (1997) 376-380
15. JBIEBNM. An introduction to systematic reviews, changing practice Sup. 1. In: Changing practice: evidence based practice information sheets for health professionals; 2001.
16. Whittemore R., and Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing 52 5 (2005) 546-553
17. McCormack B., Wright J., Dewar B., Harvey G., and Ballantine K. A realist synthesis of evidence relating to practice development: findings from the literature analysis. Practice Development in Health Care 6 1 (2007) 25-55
18. Sackett D., Rosenberg M.C., Muir Gray J.A., Haynes R.B., and Richardson W.S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312 (1996) 71-72
19. Fulbrook P. Developing best practice in critical care nursing: knowledge, evidence and practice. Nursing in Critical Care 8 3 (2003) 96-102
20. Rycroft-Malone J., Seers K., Titchen A., Harvey G., Kitson A., and McCormack B. What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 47 1 (2004) 81-90
21. Higgins J.T.P., and Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 (2008), Cochrane Collaboration
22. NHMRC. How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence. Canberra, NHMRC 2000. In: Australian Government; 2000. p. 1-91.
23. Pagliari C., and Grimshaw J.M. Impact on group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observational study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 2 (2002) 145-153
24. Straker D. Nominal group technique. In: Straker D, editor. The Quality Toolbook. Syque, http://syque.com/quality_tools/toolbook/NGT/ngt.htm.
25. Keeney S., Hasson F., and McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing (2006) 205-212
26. Rotondi A.J., Kvetan V., Carlet J., and Sibbald W.J. Consensus conferences in critical care medicine. Methodologies and impact. Critical Care Clinics 13 2 (1997) 417-439
27. Fink A., Kosecoff J., Chassin M., and Brook R.H. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health 74 9 (1984) 979-983
28. Black N., Murphy M., Lamping D., McKee M., Sanderson C., Askham J., et al. Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 4 4 (1999) 236-248
29. Suresnes P.L., Johanson W.G., Van Saene H.K.F., and Members J. Selective digestive decontamination in intensive care unit patients: 1st European Consensus Conference in Intensive Care and Emergency medicine. Intensive Care Medicine 18 (1992) 182-188
30. ESICM. The joint ESICM/ATS/ERS/SCCM/SRLF consensus conferences 2008 [cited May 4 2008]; Available from: http://www.esicm.org/Data/ModuleGestionDeContenu/PagesGenerees/07-congre sses/0B-conferences-meeting/consensus-conferences/117.asp.
31. Crisp J, Pelletier D, Duffield C, Adams A, Nagy S. The Delphi method? [Miscellaneous]. Nursing Research March/April 1997; 46(2):116-18.
32. Kennedy H.P. Enhancing Delphi research: methods and results. Journal of Advanced Nursing (2004) 504-511
33. Hasson F., Keeney S., and McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32 4 (2000) 1008-1015
34. Whitehead D., and Elliott D. Mixed-methods research. In: Whitehead Z.S., Elliott D., and LoBiondo-Wood D.G.J.H. (Eds). Nursing and Midwifery research: methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. (2007), Mosby, Sydney 248-267
35. Keeney S., Hasson F., and McKenna H. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies (2001) 195-200
36. Dowling K.L., and St Louis R.D. Asynchronous implementation of the nominal group technique: is it effective?. Decision Support Systems (2000) 229-248
37. Dunham RB. Nominal Group Technique: a users' guide. University of Wisconsin School of Business; 1998, http://instruction.bus.wisc.edu/obdemo/readings/ngt.html.
38. Lloyd G., Fowell S., and Bligh J.G. The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluative tool in medical undergraduate education. Medical Education (1999) 8-13
39. Evans C., Rogers S., McGraw C., Battle G., and Furniss L. Using consensus methods to establish multidisciplinary perspectives on research priorities for primary care. Primary Health Care Research and Development 5 (2004) 52-59
40. Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework-a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice... Promoting action on research implementation in health services. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 19 4 (2004) 297-304
41. Elliott D. Reading review papers. In: Schneider Z., Elliott D., Beanland C., LoBiondo-Wood G., and Haber J. (Eds). Nursing research: methods, critical appraisal and utilisation. 2nd ed. (2003), Mosby, Sydney 73-90
42. Davies HTO, Crombie IK. What is a systematic review? What is series, 2003 [cited 15 November 2005]; Available from: http://www.evidence-based-medicine.co.uk/.
43. Rolls K. ICU Forum. 2006 [cited; Available from: http://intensivecare.hsnet.nsw.gov.au/six/blogcms/forum/.
44. NHMRC. NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines:PILOT PROGRAM 2005-2007. In: Australian Government; 2005.
45. AGREE C. Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation: The AGREE INSTRUMENT. In: Collaboration A, editor. 2001.
46. Rolls K. Which guidelines to develop. 2006 [cited April 21 2008]; Available from: http://intensivecare.hsnet.nsw.gov.au/five/doc/rolls_guideline%20request s_ebpworkshop_june05.pdf.
47. Gardner A., Hughes C., Cook R., Henson R., Osborne S., and Gardner G. Best practice in stablisation of oral endotracheal tubes: a systematic review. Australian Critical Care 18 4 (2005) 158-165
48. Thompson L. Suctioning adults with an artificial airway (2000), The Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide
49. O'Grady N.P., Alexander M., Gerberding J.L., Heard S.O., Maki D.G., Masur H., et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 23 12 (2002) 759-769
50. Marshall A., Elliott R., Rolls K., Schacht S., and Boyle M. Eyecare in the critically ill: clinical practice guideline. Australian Critical Care 21 2 (2007) 97-109
51. Hawryluck L.A., Harvey W.R.C., Lemieux-Charles L., and Singer P.A. Consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care patient unit patients. BMC Medical Ethics (2002) 1-9
52. Shiffman R.N., Skekelle P., Overhage M., Slutsky J., Grimshaw J.M., and Deshpande A.M. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the conference on guideline standarization. Annals of Internal Medicine 139 (2003) 493-498
53. Sinuff T., Patel R., Adhikari N.K.J., Meade M.O., Schunemann H.J., and Cook D.J. Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care. Critical Care Medicine 36 (2008) 1049-1058
54. Sona C., Zack J., Schallom L., Schwartzkopf L., Huey W., McSweeney M., et al. A simple, low-cost oral care protocol reduces ventilator-associated pneumonia rates (2006), National Teaching Institute. AACN, Anaheim, CA, USA
55. Schleder B., Stott K., and Lloyd R.C. The effect of a comprehensive oral care protocol on patients at risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Journal of Advocate Health Care 4 1 (2002) 27-30