Polyethylene wear is influenced by manufacturing technique in modular TKA

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 466, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2798-2805

  Lombardi Jr , Adolph V ^a,b,c   Ellison, Bradley S ^b   Berend, Keith R ^a,b,c  

^a Joint Implant Surgeons Inc   (United States)

^b THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEREOMICROSCOPY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POLYETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA;

EID: 54449093636     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0470-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. AB Bankston H Cates MA Ritter EM Keating PM Faris 1995 Polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 317 7 13
2. LC Benson JD DesJardins M LaBarge 2001 Effects of in vitro wear machined and molded UHMWPE tibial inserts on TKR kinematics J Biomed Mater Res 58 496 504
3. JR Bohl WR Bohl PD Postak AS Greenwald 1999 The Coventry Award: the effects of shelf life on clinical outcome for gamma sterilized polyethylene tibial components Clin Orthop Relat Res 367 28 38
4. JP Collier MB Mayor JL McNamara VA Surprenant RE Jensen 1991 Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibial knee components Clin Orthop Relat Res 273 232 242
5. JP Collier LC Sutula BH Currier JH Currier RE Wooding IR Williams KB Farber MB Mayor 1996 Overview of polyethylene as a bearing material: comparison of sterilization methods Clin Orthop Relat Res 333 76 86
6. MB Collier CA Engh Jr JP McAuley GA Engh 2007 Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 1306 1314
7. MB Collier CA Engh Jr JP McAuley SD Ginn GA Engh 2005 Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 2702 2708
8. MA Conditt SK Ismaily JW Alexander PC Noble 2004 Backside wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene tibial inserts J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 1031 1037
9. MA Conditt JA Stein PC Noble 2004 Factors affecting the severity of backside war of modular tibial inserts J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 306 311
10. MA Conditt MT Thompson MM Usrey SK Ismaily PC Noble 2005 Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: Mechanism and magnitude of material loss J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 326 331
11. JM Cuckler J Lemons JR Tamarapalli P Beck 2003 Polyethylene damage on the nonarticular surface of modular total knee prostheses Clin Orthop Relat Res 410 248 253
12. Currier BH, Currier JH, Collier, Mayor MB. Effect of fabrication method and resin type on performance of tibial bearings. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:143-151.
13. GA Engh DJ Ammeen 2004 Epidemiology of osteolysis: backside implant wear Instr Course Lect 53 243 249
14. GA Engh KA Dwyer CK Hanes 1992 Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 9 17
15. GA Engh S Lounici AR Rao MB Collier 2001 In vivo deterioration of tibial baseplate locking mechanisms in contemporary modular total knee components J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 1660 1665
16. TK Fehring JA Murphy TD Hayes DW Roberts DL Pomeroy WL Griffin 2004 Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 40 50
17. K Hirakawa TW Bauer BN Stulberg AH Wilde 1996 Comparison and quantitation of wear debris of failed total hip and knee arthroplasty J Biomed Mater Res 31 257 263
18. CA Holding DM Findlay R Stamenkov SD Neale H Lucas AS Dharmapatni SA Callary KR Shrestha GJ Atkins DW Howie DR Haynes 2006 Correlation of RANK, RANKL, and TNF-alpha expression with bone loss volume and polyethylene wear debris around hip implants Biomaterials 27 5212 5219
19. G Holt C Murnaghan J Reilly RM Meek 2007 The biology of aseptic osteolysis Clin Orthop Relat Res 460 240 252
20. RW Hood TM Wright AH Burstein 1983 Retrieval analysis of total knee prosthesis J Biomed Mater Res 17 829 842
21. MM Landy PS Walker 1998 Wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene components of 90 retrieved knee prostheses J Arthroplasty 3 S73 85
22. S Li G Scuderi BD Furman S Bhattacharyya JJ Schmieg JN Insall 2002 Assessment of backside wear from the analysis of 55 retrieved tibial inserts Clin Orthop Relat Res 404 75 82
23. JH Lonner JM Siliski RD Scott 1999 Prodromes of failure of total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 14 488 492
24. R Mueller-Rath B Kleffner S Andereya T Mumme DC Wirtz 2007 Measures for reducing ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene wear in total knee replacement: a simulator study Biomed Tech (Berl) 52 295 300
25. OK Muratoglu J Ruberti S Melotti SH Spiegelberg BA Greenbaum WH Harris 2003 Optical analysis of surface changes on early retrievals of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene tibial inserts J Arthroplasty 18 42 47
26. DD Naudie DJ Ammeen GA Engh CH Rorabeck 2007 Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15 53 64
27. DD Naudie CH Rorabeck 2004 Sources of osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: wear of the bearing surface Instr Course Lect 53 251 259
28. NL Parks GA Engh LD Topoleski J Emperado 1998 The Coventry Award: modular tibial insert micromotion A concern with contemporary knee implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356 10 15
29. AR Rao GA Engh MB Collier S Lounici 2002 Tibial interface wear in retrieved total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 1849 1855
30. TP Schmalzried JJ Callaghan 1999 Wear in total hip and knee replacements J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 115 136
31. TP Schmalzried P Campbell AK Schmitt IC Brown HC Amstutz 1997 Shapes and dimensional characteristics of polyethylene wear particles in vivo by total knee replacements compared to total hip replacements J Biomed Mater Res 38 203 210
32. AS Shanbhag HO Bailey DS Hwang CW Cha NG Eror HE Rubash 2000 Quantitative analysis of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris associated with total knee replacements J Biomed Mater Res 53 100 110
33. PF Sharkey WJ Hozack RH Rothman S Shastri SM Jacoby 2002 Insall Award Paper: why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404 7 13
34. N Taki VM Goldberg MJ Kraay CM Rimnac 2004 Backside wear of Miller-Galante I and Insall-Burstein II tibial inserts Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 198 206
35. MG Tanner LA Whiteside SE White 1995 Effect of polyethylene quality on wear in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 317 83 88
36. RC Wasielewski JO Galante RM Leighty RN Natarajan AG Rosenberg 1994 Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 299 31 43
37. RC Wasielewski N Parks I Williams H Suprenant JP Collier G Engh 1997 Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris Clin Orthop Relat Res 345 53 59
38. CH Won S Rohatagi MJ Kraay VM Goldberg CM Rimnac 2000 Effect of resin type and manufacturing method on wear of polyethylene tibial components Clin Orthop Relat Res 376 161 171