The research communications studio as/a tool for developing undergraduate researchers in engineering

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 12027-12046

  Long, Chris ^a   Alford, Elisabeth ^a,b   Brader, John ^a   Donath, Lori ^a   Johnson, Robert ^a   Liao, C ^a   McGarry, Theresa ^a   Matthews, Michael ^a,b,c,d   Spray, Roxanne ^a   Thompson, Nancy ^a,e   Vilar, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Research Communications Studio

^c Chemical Engineering

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Research Communications Studio   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION; CODING SYSTEMS; QUALITATIVE DATA; RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS STUDIO (RCS);

CURRICULA; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; STUDIOS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 5444263305     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). HowPeople Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Edelsky, Carole. 1993. Who's got the floor? Gender and conversational interaction, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 189-227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Egbert, Maria. 1997. Schisming: The collaborative transformation from a single conversation to multiple conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30.1-51
4. Johnson, R., Penny, J., Fisher, S., & Kuhs, T. (in press). Score resolution: An investigation of the reliability and validity of resolved scores. Applied Measurement in Education.
5. Moss, P., Schutz, A., & Collins, K. (1997, April). Developing coherence between assessment and reform: An integrative approach to portfolio evaluation for teacher licensure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
6. Nunnally, J. C., 1978 Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill: New York
7. Plumb, C., & Scott, C. (2002). Outcomes assessment of engineering writing at the University of Washington. The Journal of Engineering Education, 333-337.
8. Salomon, Gavriel, ed. (1993). No distribution without individuals' cognition: A dynamic, interactional view. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press (pp. 111-138).
9. Simon, H.A. (2001). Learning to research about learning. S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. (pp. 205-226).
10. Spandel, V. (2001). Creating writers (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
11. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Wolcott, W. (with Legg, S.) (1998). An overview of writing assessment: Theory, research, and practice. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English