Artificial neural networks for predictive modeling in prostate cancer

Current Oncology Reports

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 216-221

  Gamito, Eduard J ^a   Crawford, E David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 5444243432     PISSN: 15233790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-004-0052-z     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Stampler MJ: A prospective evaluation of plasma prostate-specific antigen for detection of prostate cancer. JAMA 1995, 273:289-294.
2. Ruckle HC, Klee GG, Oesterling JE: Prostate-specific antigen. Mayo Clin Proc 1994, 69:59-68.
3. Smith DS, Catalona WJ: The nature of prostate cancer detected through prostate specific antigen based screening. J Urol 1994, 152:1732-1736.
4. Partin AW, Kattan MW, Subing ENP, et al.: Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason sum to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional update. JAMA 1997, 277:1445-1451.
5. Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AMF, et al.: A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998, 90:766-771.
6. Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT: A postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999, 17:1499-1507.
7. Wei JT, Tewari A: Artificial neural networks in urology: Pro. Urology 1999, 54:945-948.
8. Krongrad A, Lai S: Artificial neural networks in urology: Con. Urology 1999, 54:949-951.
9. Werbos PJ: Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences. In PhD thesis, Harvard University; 1974.
10. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL: Parallel Distributed Processing, vols 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986:487A.
11. Dayhoff JE, DeLeo JM: Artificial neural networks: opening the black box. Cancer 2001, 91(Suppl 8):1615-1635.
12. Dayhoff J: Neural Networks Architectures: An Introduction Boston: International Thompson Computers Press; 1996.
13. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143:29-36.
14. Hanley JA, McNeil NJ: A method of comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983, 148:839-843.
15. Chen T, Chen H: Universal approximation to nonlinear operators by neural networks with arbitrary activation functions and its application to dynamical systems. Neural Networks 1995, 6: 11-917.
16. Hornik, Stinchcomb, White: Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 1989, 2: 59-366.
17. Park J, Sandberg IW: Universal approximation using radial-basis function networks. Neural Comput 1993, 3: 46-257.
18. McMillan C, Mozer MC, Smolensky P: Rule induction through integrated symbolic and subsymbolic processing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Edited by Moody JE, Hanson SJ, Lippman RP. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann; 1991:969.
19. Alexander JA, Mozer MC: Template-based procedures for neural network interpretation. Neural Networks 1999, 12: 79-498.
20. Towell G, Shavlik JW: Interpretation of artificial neural networks: mapping knowledge-based neural networks into rules. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Edited by Moody JE, Hanson SJ, Lippman RP. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann; 1991:977.
21. Snow PB, Smith DS, Catalona WJ: Artificial neural networks in the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study. J Urol 1994, 152:1923-1926.
22. Snow P, Crawford ED, DeAntoni EP, et al.: Prostate cancer diagnosis from artificial neural networks using the Prostate Cancer Awareness Week (PCAW) database. J Urol 1997, 157 (Suppl):365.
23. Finne P, Finne R, Auvinen A, et al.: Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy in screen-positive men by multilayer perceptron network. Urology 2000, 56:418-422.
24. Gamito EJ, Porter CR, Crawford CR, et al.: Predicting prostate biopsy outcome: a robust model validated with data from three independent institutions [abstract]. Presented at 14th International Prostate Cancer Update, Vail, CO, February 2004.
25. Remzi M, Anagnostou T, Ravery V, et al.: An artificial neural network to predict the outcome of repeat prostate biopsies. Urology 2003, 62:456-460.
26. Tewari A, Narayan P: Novel staging tool for localized prostate cancer: a pilot study using genetic adaptive neural networks. J Urol 1998, 160:430-436.
27. Batuello JT, Gamito EJ, Crawford ED, et al.: Artificial neural network model for the assessment of lymph node spread in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 2001, 57:481-485.
28. Crawford ED, Gamito EJ, O'Donnell C, et al.: Artificial neural network model to predict risk of non-organ-confined disease and risk of lymph node spread in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2001, 165(Suppl):233.
29. Zlotta AR, Remzi M, Snow PB, et al.: An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng/mL or less. J Urol 2003, 169:1724-1728.
30. Potter SR, Miller MC, Mangold LA, et al.: Genetically engineered neural networks for predicting prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. Urology 1999, 54: 91-795.
31. Han M, Snow PB, Epstein JI, et al.: A neural network predicts progression for men with Gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 tumors after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000, 56:994-999.
32. Tewari A, Issa M, El-Galley P, et al.: Genetic adaptive neural network model to predict biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Mol Urol 2002, 5:163-170.
33. Biganzoli E, Boracchi P, Mariani L, Marubini E: Feed forward neural networks for the analysis of censored survival data: a partial logistic regression approach. Stat Med 1998, 17: 169-1186.
34. Anand SS, Hamilton PW, Hughes JG, Bell DA: On prognostic models, artificial intelligence and censored observations. Methods Inform Med 2001, 40:18-24.
35. Bryce TJ, Dewhirst MW, Floyd CE Jr, et al.: Artificial neural network model of survival in patients treated with irradiation with and without concurrent chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 41:339-345.
36. Harbeck N, Kates R, Ulm K, et al.: Neural network analysis of follow-up data in primary breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers 2000, 15:116-122.
37. Lundin M, Lundin J, Burke HB, et al.: Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer. Oncology 1999, 57:281-286.
38. Tewari A, Peabody J, Stricker H, et al.: Genetic adaptive network to predict long term survival in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2001, 165(Suppl):389.