-
1
-
-
34547556566
-
-
See for example
-
See for example, G. Grüner: Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 1129.
-
(1988)
Rev. Mod. Phys
, vol.60
, pp. 1129
-
-
Grüner, G.1
-
3
-
-
42749107707
-
-
C. H. Lee, H. Matsuhata, H. Yamaguchi, C. Sekine, K. Kihou, T. Suzuki, T. Noro, and I. Shirotani: Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 153105.
-
(2004)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.70
, pp. 153105
-
-
Lee, C.H.1
Matsuhata, H.2
Yamaguchi, H.3
Sekine, C.4
Kihou, K.5
Suzuki, T.6
Noro, T.7
Shirotani, I.8
-
4
-
-
33644964718
-
-
K. Iwasa, L. Hao, K. Kuwahara, M. Kohgi, S. R. Saha, H. Sugawara, Y. Aoki, H. Sato, T. Tayama, and T. Sakakibara: Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 024414.
-
(2005)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.72
, pp. 024414
-
-
Iwasa, K.1
Hao, L.2
Kuwahara, K.3
Kohgi, M.4
Saha, S.R.5
Sugawara, H.6
Aoki, Y.7
Sato, H.8
Tayama, T.9
Sakakibara, T.10
-
5
-
-
24644509271
-
-
K. Iwasa, L. Hao, T. Hasegawa, T. Takagi, K. Horiuchi, Y. Mori, Y. Murakami, K. Kuwahara, M. Kohgi, H. Sugawara, S. R. Saha, Y. Aoki, and H. Sato: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74 (2005) 1930.
-
(2005)
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn
, vol.74
, pp. 1930
-
-
Iwasa, K.1
Hao, L.2
Hasegawa, T.3
Takagi, T.4
Horiuchi, K.5
Mori, Y.6
Murakami, Y.7
Kuwahara, K.8
Kohgi, M.9
Sugawara, H.10
Saha, S.R.11
Aoki, Y.12
Sato, H.13
-
6
-
-
33645854934
-
-
Y. Nakanishi, T. Kumagai, O. Masafumi, T. Tanizawa, M. Yoshizawa, S. R. Saha, H. Sugawara, and H. Sato: Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 165115.
-
(2006)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.73
, pp. 165115
-
-
Nakanishi, Y.1
Kumagai, T.2
Masafumi, O.3
Tanizawa, T.4
Yoshizawa, M.5
Saha, S.R.6
Sugawara, H.7
Sato, H.8
-
7
-
-
54349129009
-
-
private communication. It is pointed out from a recent specific heat measurement that the degeneracy of the triplet can be lifted with a very small energy scale on the order of 1K
-
Y. Aoki, private communication. It is pointed out from a recent specific heat measurement that the degeneracy of the triplet can be lifted with a very small energy scale on the order of 1K.
-
-
-
Aoki, Y.1
-
9
-
-
28744437190
-
-
S. R. Saha, H. Sugawara, Y. Aoki, H. Sato, Y. Inada, H. Shishido, R. Settai, Y. Ōnuki, and H. Harima: Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 132502.
-
(2005)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.71
, pp. 132502
-
-
Saha, S.R.1
Sugawara, H.2
Aoki, Y.3
Sato, H.4
Inada, Y.5
Shishido, H.6
Settai, R.7
Ōnuki, Y.8
Harima, H.9
-
12
-
-
54349128786
-
-
To be exact, the nesting wave vector is Q, 1, 0, 0) in the fcc lattice of Pr ions.8) In this paper, we do not mention the details of the band structure, because only the DOS is relevant within the CPA applied to the model 1
-
8) In this paper, we do not mention the details of the band structure, because only the DOS is relevant within the CPA applied to the model (1).
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
54349110240
-
-
b = 0 at T = 0.
-
b = 0 at T = 0.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
0345761554
-
-
The model (1) is regarded as a variant of the Falicov-Kimball model, whose DMFT results has been reviewed in J. K. Freericks and V. Zlatić: Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 1333.
-
The model (1) is regarded as a variant of the Falicov-Kimball model, whose DMFT results has been reviewed in J. K. Freericks and V. Zlatić: Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 1333.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
0043175118
-
-
S. R. Saha, H. Sugawara, T. Namiki, Y. Aoki, and H. Sato: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) S2163.
-
(2003)
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
, vol.15
-
-
Saha, S.R.1
Sugawara, H.2
Namiki, T.3
Aoki, Y.4
Sato, H.5
-
16
-
-
39849100877
-
-
c being almost unchanged. We point out a possibility to interpret this feature by assuming that an applied pressure predominantly enhances Δ in the present model. See the experimental paper by A. Miyake, A. T. Holmes, T. Kagayama, K. Shimizu, C. Sekine, I. Shirotani, D. Kikuchi, H. Sugawara, and H. Sato: Physica B 403 (2008) 1298.
-
c being almost unchanged. We point out a possibility to interpret this feature by assuming that an applied pressure predominantly enhances Δ in the present model. See the experimental paper by A. Miyake, A. T. Holmes, T. Kagayama, K. Shimizu, C. Sekine, I. Shirotani, D. Kikuchi, H. Sugawara, and H. Sato: Physica B 403 (2008) 1298.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
54349119913
-
-
In an experiment,15 there appears a cusp singularity in resistivity at Tc, which is much more pronounced than that in the present result in Fig. 4. One of the reasons for this discrepancy might be the use of a simplified parabolic DOS in this study, instead of a realistic one for the fcc tight-binding model.8
-
8)
-
-
-
|