Crohn's disease evaluated with magnetic resonance enteroclysis: Diagnostic performance of experienced and inexperienced readers before and after training

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 967-974

  Negaard, A ^a   Mulahasanovic, A ^b   Reisaeter, L A ^b   Aasekjaer, K ^b   Sandvik, L ^b   Klow, N E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Crohn's disease; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sensitivity; Small bowel; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; FUZZY SYSTEMS; MAGNETIC MATERIALS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PORT TERMINALS; RESONANCE;

BEFORE AND AFTER; CLINICAL RECORDS; CROHN'S DISEASE; CROHN'S DISEASES; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCES; DIAGNOSTIC VALUES; INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENTS; LOW SENSITIVITIES; RADIOLOGICAL METHODS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SENSITIVITY; SMALL BOWEL; SPECIFICITY; WALL THICKNESSES;

BACKWARD WAVE TUBES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROHN DISEASE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMALL INTESTINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CROHN DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINE, SMALL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 54349098254     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850802409539     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Rieber A, Wruk D, Potthast S, Nussle K, Reinshagen M, Adler G, et al. Diagnostic imaging in Crohn's disease: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional imaging methods. Int J Colorectal Dis 2000; 15:176-81.
2. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000;215:717-25.
3. Wiarda BM, Kuipers EJ, Heitbrink MA, van OA, Stoker J. MR enteroclysis of inflammatory small-bowel diseases. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:522-31.
4. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, Prassopoulos P, Roussomoustakaki M. Assessment of Crohn's disease activity in the small bowel with MR and conventional enteroclysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1017-24.
5. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, Amin Z, Zeegen R, Westaby D, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1325-32.
6. Sempere GA, Martinez S, Sanjuan V, Medina Chulia E, Benages A, Tome Toyosato A, et al. MRI evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:1829-35.
7. Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, Colaiacomo MC, Cocco A, Montesani C, et al. MR imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: value of T2-versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 2006;238: 517-30.
8. Negaard A, Sandvik L, Mulahasanovic A, Berstad AE, Klow NE. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis in the diagnosis of small-intestinal Crohn's disease: diagnostic accuracy and inter- and intra-observer agreement. Acta Radiol 2006;47:1008-16.
9. Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Taylor S, Williams A, Cohen R, Bartram C. MRI of fistula in ano: inter- and intraobserver agreement and effects of directed education. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:135-40.
10. Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG, Atkin W, Bartram C, Fenlon H, et al. CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1745-9.
11. Mullerad M, Hricak H, Wang L, Chen HN, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Prostate cancer: detection of extra-capsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232:140-6.
12. Masselli G, Brizi GM, Parrella A, Minordi LM, Vecchioli A, Marano P. Crohn's disease: magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 2004;29: 326-34.
13. Umschaden HW, Gasser J. MR enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:231-48.
14. Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, Duvoisin B, Meuli R, Michetti P, et al. Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of "sign-by-sign" correlation. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1303-11.
15. Ochsenkuhn T, Herrmann K, Schoenberg SO, Reiser MF, Goke B, Sackmann M. Crohn's disease of the small bowel proximal to the terminal ileum: detection by MR-enteroclysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004;39: 953-60.
16. Halligan S, Saunders B, Williams C, Bartram C. Adult Crohn's disease: can ileoscopy replace small bowel radiology? Abdom Imaging 1998;23:117-21.
17. Otterson MF, Lundeen SJ, Spinelli KS, Sudakoff GS, Telford GL, Hatoum OA, et al. Radiographic under-estimation of small bowel stricturing Crohn's disease: a comparison with surgical findings. Surgery 2004; 136: 854-60.
18. Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A, Stock K, Lesske J, Gobel CM, et al. Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 2005;54:1721-7.
19. Gourtsoyiannis NC, Papanikolaou N. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2005;26: 237-46.