Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy for learning from texts: Can the acquisition of knowledge and skills be fostered by prompts?;Concept mapping zum lernen aus texten: Können prompts den wissens- und strategieerwerb fördern?

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 119-125

  Hilbert, Tatjana S ^a   Nückles, Matthias ^a   Renkl, Alexander ^b   Minarik, Carla ^b   Reich, Angelika ^b   Ruhe, Katharina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Concept mapping; Learning from texts; Learning strategies; Prompts

Indexed keywords

EID: 54249169685     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652.22.2.119     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Amer, A. A. (1994). The effect of knowledge-map and underlining training on the reading comprehension of scientific texts. English Specific Purposes, 13, 35-45.
2. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
3. Berthold, K., Nückles, M. & Renkl, A. (2004). Writing learning protocols: Prompts foster cognitive and metacognitive activities as well as learning outcomes. In P. Gerjets, J. Elen, R. Joiner & P. Kirschner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning (pp. 193-200). Tübingen, Germany: Knowledge Media Research Center.
4. Berthold, K., Nückles, M. & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564-577.
5. Chang, K.-E., Sung, Y.-T. & Chen, I.-D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 5-23.
6. Chang, K.-E., Sung, Y.-T. & Chen, S.-F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 21-33.
7. Chularut, P. & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 248-263.
8. Den Elzen-Rump, V. & Leutner, D. (2007). Naturwissenschaftliche Sachtexte verstehen - Ein computerbasiertes Trainingsprogramm für Schüler der 10. Jahrgangsstufe zum Selbstregulierten Lernen mit einer Mapping-Strategie. In M. Landmann & B. Schmitz (Hrsg.), Selbstregulation erfolgreich fördern (S. 251-268). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
9. Friedrich, H. F. & Mandl, H. (1997). Analyse und Förderung selbstgesteuerten Lernens. In F. E. Weinert & H. Mandl (Hrsg.), Psychologie der Erwachsenenbildung: Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, D, Serie Pädagogische Psychologie, Bd. 4 (S. 237-293). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
10. Hardy, I. & Stadelhofer, B. (2005). Lücken-Maps: Eine wirkungsvolle Variante der Concept Map zur Strukturierung naturwissenschaftlicher Lerninhalte. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 175-187.
11. Hauser, S., Nückles, M. & Renkl, A. (2006). Supporting concept mapping for learning from text. In S. Barab, K. Hay & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 243-249). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Hilbert, T. S. & Renkl, A. (in press). Learning how to use a computer-based concept mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps. Computers in Human Behavior.
13. Hilbert, T. S. & Renkl, A. (2008). Concept mapping as a follow-up strategy to learning from texts: What characterizes good and poor mappers? Instructional Science, 36, 53-73.
14. Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M. & Woods, A. L. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77, 95-111.
15. Hübner, S., Nückles, M. & Renkl, A. (2006). Prompting cognitive andmetacognitive processing inwriting-to-learn enhances learning outcomes. In R. Sun (Eds), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 357-362). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K. & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2003). The Expertise Reversal Effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31.
18. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and note-taking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303-323.
19. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Leopold, C., den Elzen-Rump, V. & Leutner, D. (2006). Selbstreguliertes Lernen aus Sachtexten. In M. Prenzel & L. Allolio-Näcke (Hrsg.), Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule. Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms (S. 268-288). Münster: Waxmann.
21. Leopold, C. & Leutner, D. (2005). Selbstregulation beim Lernen aus Sachtexten. In H. Mandl & F. Fischer (Hrsg.), Handbuch Lernstrategien (S. 162-171). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
22. Mandl, H. & Fischer, F. (2000). Mapping-Techniken und Begriffsnetze in Lern- und Kooperationsprozessen. In H. Mandl & F. Fischer (Hrsg.), Wissen sichtbar machen: Wissensmanagement mit Mapping-Techniken (S. 3-12). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
23. Novak, J. D. (1984). Response to «Rehashing Ausubel's limited and dated learning theory.» Journal of Structural Learning, 8, 87-89.
24. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
25. Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F. & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as Scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71-86.
27. Reader, W. & Hammond, N. (1994). Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: Concept mapping tools and beyond. Computers and Education, 22, 99-106.
28. Renkl, A. & Nückles, M. (2006). Lernstrategien der externen Visualisierung. In H. Mandl & H. F. Friedrich (Hrsg.), Handbuch Lernstrategien (S. 135-147). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
29. Robinson, D. H. & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 455-467.
30. Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L. & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. A correlational approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1985). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal & R. Glaser (Hrsg.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (S. 563-577). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Schwonke, R., Hauser, S., Nückles, M. & Renkl, A. (2006). Enhancing computer-supported writing of learning protocols by adaptive prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 77-92.