Further reflections on the reflection effect

Research in Experimental Economics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2008, Pages 405-440

  Laury, Susan K ^a   Holt, Charles A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54249128257     PISSN: 01932306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0193-2306(08)00009-4     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H., & Jiranyakul, K. (1990). Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3(1) 25-50.
2. Binswanger, H. P. (1980a). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 02(3), 395-407.
3. Binswanger, H. P. (1980b). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 395-407.
4. Bosch-Domenech, A., & Silvestre, J. (1999). Docs risk aversion or attraction depend on income? An experiment. Economics Letter, 65(3), 265-273.
5. Bosche-Domènech, A., & Silvestre, J. (2006). Reflections on gains and losses: A 2×2×7 experiment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33, 217-235.
6. Camerer, C. F. (1989), An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2(1), 61-104.
7. Camerer, C. F. (2001). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In: D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 288-300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1-3), 7-42.
9. Cherry, T., Frykbom, P., & Shogren, J. (2002). Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218-1221.
10. Cohen, M., Jaffray, J., & Said, T. (1987). Experimental comparisons of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 1-22.
11. Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K., Nagode, J. C., Rustichini, A., Smith, K., & Pardo, J. V. (2003). The impact of certainty context on the process of choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(18 March), 3536-3541.
12. Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295(22 March), 2279-2282.
13. Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2002). Prospect theory in choice and pricing tasks. Working Paper. University of Oregon.
14. Harrison, G., & Rutström, E. (2007). Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation experiments. In: C. R. Plott & V. L. Smith (Eds), Handbook of experimental economics results. New York: Elsevier Press.
15. Harrison, G., & Rutstrom, E. (2008). Risk aversion in the laboratory. In: J. C. Cox & G. W. Harrison (Eds), Risk aversion in experiments (Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 12). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. Harrison, G. W. (2006). Hypothetical bias over uncertain outcomes. In: J. A. List (Ed.), Using experimental methods in environmental and resource economics (pp. 41-69). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
17. Harrison, G. W., Johnson, E., McInnes, M., & Rutstrom, E. (2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects: Comment. American Economic Review, 95(3), 897-901.
18. Hershey, J. C., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1980). Risk taking and problem context in the domain of losses: An expected utility analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 47(1), 111-132.
19. Hilton, R. W. (1988). Risk attitude under two alternative theories of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9, 119-136.
20. Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76(3), 508-515.
21. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644-1655.
22. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects: New data without order effects. American Economic Review, 95(3), 902-912.
23. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of choice under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
24. Kobberling, V., & Wakker, P. (2005). An index of loss aversion. Journal of Economic Theory, 122, 119-132.
25. Laury, S. K. (2002). Pay one or pay all: Random selection of one choice for payment. Working Paper. Georgia State University.
26. Laury, S. K., & Holt, C. A. (2007). Payoff effects and risk preference under real and hypothetical conditions. In: C. Plott & V. Smith (Eds), Handbook of experimental results. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. Laury, S. K., & McInnes, M. M. (2003). The impact of insurance prices on decision-making biases: An experimental analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 70(2), 219-233.
28. Laury, S. K., McInnes, M. M., & Swarthout, J. T. (2007). Catastrophic insurance: New experimental evidence. Working Paper. Georgia State University.
29. Levy, H., & Levy, M. (2002). Arrow-Pratt risk aversion, risk premium, and decision weights. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25(3), 265-290.
30. Myagkov, M., & Plott, C. (1997). Exchange economics and loss exposure: experiments exploring prospect theory and competitive equilibria in market environments. American Economic Review, 87(5), 801-828.
31. Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32(1-2), 122-136.
32. Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica, 68(5), 1281-1292.
33. Rutstrom, E., & Williams, M. (2000). Entitlements and fairness: An experimental study of distributive preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43(1).
34. Slovic, P. (1969). Differential effects of real versus hypothetical payoffs on choices among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 434-437.
35. Slovic, P. (2001). Rational actors or rational fools: implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics (Vol. 31, pp. 245-261). Working Paper. University of Oregon.
36. Smith, V. L., & Walker, J. M. (1993). Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Economic Inquiry, 31(2), 245-261.
37. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 54(4), 297-323.
38. Tversky, A., & Wakker, P. (1995). Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica, 63(6), 1255-1280.
39. Wilcox, N. (2007). 'Stochastically more risk averse:' A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk. Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming.
40. Wilcox, N. (2008). Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: A critical primer and econometric comparison. In: J. C. Cox & G. W. Harrison (Eds), Risk aversion in experiments (Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 12). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.