The selective functionalization of saturated hydrocarbons. Part 32. Distinction between the FeII-FeIV and Fe III-FeV manifolds in Gif chemistry. The importance of carboxylic acids for alkane activation. Evidence for a dimeric iron species involved in Gif-type chemistry

Journal of the Chemical Society. Perkin Transactions 2

Volumn 6, Issue , 1996, Pages 1031-1041

  Barton, Derek H R ^a   Hu, Bin ^a   Taylor, Dennis K ^a   Rojas Wahl, Roy U ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54249121851     PISSN: 03009580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/p29960001031     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. (a) G. A. Olah and À. Molnár, Hydrocarbon Chemistry, Wiley, New York, Chichester, 1995;
2. (b) D. H. R. Barton, D. T. Sawyer and A. E. Martell, eds., The Activation of Dioxygen and Homogeneous Catalytic Oxidation, Plenum Press, New York, London, 1993.
3. D. H. R. Barton and D. Doller, Acc. Chem. Res., 1992, 25, 504.
4. For other significant contributions to Gif chemistry see: (a) H.-C. Tung, C. Kang and D. T. Sawyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 3445 and references cited therein;
5. (b) U. Schuchardt, W. A. Carvalho and E. V. Spinace, Synlett, 1993, 713 and references cited therein;
6. (c) T. Briffaud, C. Larpent and H. Patin, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1990, 1193;
7. (d) K.-W. Lee, K.-W. Jun and E. K. Shim, New J. Chem., 1993, 17, 409 and references therein.
8. D. H. R. Barton, S. D. Bévière, W. Chavasiri, E. Csuhai, D. Doller and W: G. Liu, J. Am Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 2147.
9. D. H. R. Barton, E. Csuhai, D. Doller and G. Balavoine, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1990, 1787.
10. C. Knight and M. J. Perkins, J. Chem. Soc.; Chem. Commun., 1991, 925.
11. (a) D. H. R. Barton, S. D. Bévière, W. Chavasiri, D. Doller, W. G. Liu and J. H. Reibenspies, New J. Chem., 1992, 16, 1019;
12. (b) D. T. Sawyer, C. Kang, A. Llobet and C. Redman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 5817.
13. D. H. R. Barton, F. Halley, N. Ozbalik, M. Schmitt, E. Young and G. Balavoine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 7144.
14. D. H. R. Barton, E. Csuhai and N. Ozbalik, Tetrahedron, 1990, 46, 3743.
15. D. H. R. Barton and S. D. Bévière, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 5689.
16. (a) D. H. R. Barton, S. D. Bévière, W. Chavasiri, D. Doller and B. Hu, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 1871;
17. (b) D. H. R. Barton, S. D. Bévière and W. Chavasiri, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 31.
18. +: I. W. E. Arends, K. U. Ingold and D. D. M. Wayner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 4710;
19. V system: D. W. Snelgrove, P. A. MacFaul, K. U. Ingold and D. D. M. Wayner, Tetrahedron Lett., submitted.
20. F. Minisci, F. Fontana, S. Araneo and F. Recupero, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 1823;
21. Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 3759;
22. F. Minisci and F. Fontana, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 1427.
23. C. Bardin, D. H. R. Barton, B. Hu, R. U. Rojas Wahl and D. K: Taylor, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 5805 and references cited therein.
24. Similar conclusions are abundant in the literature. See for example (a) J. T. Groves and M. Van Der Puy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 5290 and references cited therein;
25. (b) for similar conclusions in recent contributions see: D. T. Sawyer, J. P. Hage and A. Sobkowiak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 106;
26. (c) J. P. Hage, A. Llobet and D. T. Sawyer, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1995, 3, 1383;
27. (d) D. A. Wink, R. W. Nims, J. E. Saavedra, W. E. Utermahlen, Jr., and P. C. Ford, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994, 91, 6604.
28. Titrated according to: L. J. Clark, Anal. Chem., 1962, 34, 348.
29. D. H. R. Barton, B. M. Chabot, N. C. Delanghe, B. Hu, V. N. LeGloahec and R. U. Rojas Wahl, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 7007.
30. (a) A. L. Feig and S. J. Lippard, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 758;
31. (b) J. B. Vincent, G. L. Olivier-Lilley and A. Averill, Chem. Rev., 1990, 90, 1447 and references therein.
32. A. C. Rosenzweig, C. A. Frederick, S. J. Lippard and P. Nordlund, Nature (London), 1993, 366, 537.
33. A. C. Rosenzweig, P. Nordlund, P. M. Takahara, C. A. Frederick and S. J. Lippard, Chemistry Biology, 1995, 2, 409.
34. D. M. Kurz, Jr., Chem. Rev., 1990, 90, 585.
35. R. U. Rojas Wahl, Dissertation, Technical University of Braunschweig, 1995.
36. The slight increase of oxygen formation when using 3 equiv. is not an experimental error. The explanation remains speculative to this day.
37. A. Vogel, Vogel's Textbook of Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 5th edn., Longman, 1989, p. 395;
38. L. W. Winkler, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1888, 21, 2843.
39. III-Cl instead of with oxygen.
40. 2 μ-oxo-dimers: see (a) N. Kitajima, N. Tamura, H. Amagai, H. Fukui, Y. Moro-oka, Y. Mizutani, T. Kitagawa, R. Mathur, K. Heerwegh, C. A. Reed, C. R. Randall, L. Que, Jr., and K. Tatsumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 9071 and references there cited;
41. (b) Y. Hayashi, T. Kayatani, H. Sugimoto, M. Suzuki, K. Inomata, A. Uehara, Y. Mizutami, T. Kitagawa and Y. Maeda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 11 220;
42. (c) N. Kitajima, H. Fukui, Y. Moro-oka, Y. Mizutani, T. Kitagawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 6402;
43. (d) T. Ookubo, H. Sugimoto, T. Nagayama, H. Masuda, T. Sato, K. Tanaka, Y. Maeda, H. Ōkawa, Y. Hayashi, A. Uehara and M. Suzuki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 701.
44. II alone must give a dimer again, according to the back-reaction in Scheme 7.
45. For short and comprehensive overviews see for example (a) H. Friebolin, Ein- und zweidimensionale NMR-Spektroskopie - eine Einführung, VCH, Weinheim, 1988, p. 28;
46. 13C NMR Spectroscopy - A Working Manual with Exercises, MMI Press Polymer Monograph Scries, vol. 3, Harwood, 1984, ch. 9.6; for more detailed overviews and further references see for example
47. (c) T. H. Mareci and K. N. Scott, Anal. Chem., 1977, 49, 2130;
48. (d) J. N. Shoolery, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 1977, 11, 79;
49. (e) J. R. Mooney and L. D. Field, Analytical NMR, ed. S. Sternhell, Wiley, Chichester, New York, 1989, p. 41.
50. (a) F. Kasler, Quantitative Analysis by NMR Speclroscopy, Academic Press, 1973, ch. 14;
51. (b) G. C. Levy, R. L. Lichter and G. L. Nelson, Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Wiley, 1980.
52. See for a preliminary communication: D. H. R. Barton, B. Hu, R. U. Rojas Wahl and D. K. Taylor, New J. Chem., 1996, 20, 121.
53. 3. See for reactivity comparison of three examples: Y. Dong, S. Menage, B. A. Brennan, T. E. Elgreen, H. G. Jang, L. L. Pearce and L. Que, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 1851.
54. (a) K. E. Liu, A. M. Valentine, D. Wang, B. Hanh Huynh, D. E. Edmondson, A. Salifoglou and S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 10 174 and references therein;
55. (b) S.-K. Lee, J. C. Nesheim and J. D. Lipscomb, J. Biol. Chem., 1993, 268, 21 569;
56. S.-K. Lee, B. G. Fox, W. A. Froland and J. D. Lipscomb, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 6450.
57. See for example: (a) ref. 17(a), (b) and ref. 31;
58. (b) J. Silver, ed., Chemistry of Iron, Blackie, London, Glasgow, 1993;
59. (c) the only high-valent non-heme iron species isolated and partially characterized has so far been reported not to attack a saturated hydrocarbon: Y. Dong, H. Fuji, M. P. Hendrich, R. A. Leising, G. Pan, C. R. Randall, E. C. Wilkinson, Y. Zang, L. Que, Jr., B. G. Fox, K. Kauffmann and E. Munck, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 2778.
60. For membrane-bound MMO (Bath) see: H. H. T. Nguyen, A. K. Shiemke, S. J. Jacobs, B. J. Hales, M. E. Lidstrom and S. I. Chan, J. Biol. Chem., 1994, 269, 14 995 and references cited therein.
61. For both membrane-bound and soluble MMO (Bath) see: S. D. Prior and H. Dalton, J. Gen. Microbiol., 1985, 131, 155.
62. (a) D. H. R. Barton, E. Csuhai and N. Ozbalik, Tetrahedron, 1990, 46, 3743;
63. (b) G. Balavoine, D. H. R. Barton, J. Boivin, A. Gref, P. LeCoupanec, N. Ozbalik, J. A. X. Pestana and H. Rivière, Tetrahedron, 1988, 44, 1091.
64. (a) R. H. Schultz, A. A. Bengali, M. J. Tauber, B. H. Weiller, E. P. Wasserman, K. R. Kyle, C. B. Moore and R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 7369;
65. (b) A. A. Bengali, R. H. Schultz, C. B. Moore and R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 9585 and references cited therein.
66. As we often followed the course of a reaction, we needed a large spectral window. Smaller spectral windows with shorter acquisition times gave similar quantification results. Thus the quantification results are not impaired by this large spectral window.