Interactions between environmental factors can hide isolation by distance patterns: A case study of Ctenomys rionegrensis in Uruguay

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 275, Issue 1651, 2008, Pages 2633-2638

  Kittlein, Marcelo J ^a   Gaggiotti, Oscar E ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE MAR DEL PLATA   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian methods; Genetic structure; Isolation by distance; Population expansion

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIODIVERSITY; DEMOGRAPHIC HISTORY; DISPERSAL; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC STRUCTURE; ISOLATED POPULATION; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION MODELING; POPULATION SIZE; RANGE EXPANSION; RODENT;

ANIMAL GENETICS; ARTICLE; CTENOMYS RIONEGRENSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC DIFFERENCE; GENETIC ISOLATION BY DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RODENT; URUGUAY;

SOUTH AMERICA; URUGUAY;

CTENOMYS RIONEGRENSIS;

EID: 54249108399     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0816     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alonso, C. 1978 La fauna de moluscos del yacimiento de Playa Pascual con referencia a otros yacimientos estuáricos y marinos del cuaternario de Uruguay. Com. Soc. Malaco. Uruguay 4, 365-383.
2. Alvarez-Castañeda, S. & Patton, J. 2004 Geographic genetic architecture of pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) populations in Baja California, Mexico. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2287-2301. (doi:10.1111/j.1365- 294X.2004.02243.x)
3. Balding, D. J. & Nichols, R. A. 1995 A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica 96, 3-12. (doi:10.1007/BF01441146)
4. Broquet, T., Ray, N., Petit, E., Fryxell, J. & Burel, F. 2006 Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana). Landsc. Ecol. 21, 877-889. (doi:10.1007/s10980-005-5956-y)
5. Busch, C., Antinuchi, C., del Valle, J., Kittlein, M., Malizia, A., Vassallo, A. & Zenuto, R. 2000 Population ecology of subterranean rodents. In Life underground: the biology of subterranean rodents (eds E. Lacey, J. Patton & G. Cameron), pp. 183-226. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Castillo, A., Cortinas, M. & Lessa, E. 2005 Rapid diversification of South American tuco-tucos (Ctenomys; Rodentia, Ctenomyidae): contrasting mitochondrial and nuclear intron sequences. J. Mammal. 86, 170-179. (doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2005)086〈0170:RDOSAT〉2.0.CO;2)
7. Congdon, B., Piatt, J., Martin, K. & Friesen, V. 2000 Mechanisms of population differentiation in marbled murrelets: historical versus contemporary processes. Evolution 54, 974-986.
8. Cook, J. & Lessa, E. 1998 Are rates of diversification in subterranean South American tuco-tucos (genus Ctenomys, Rodentia: Octodontidae) unusually high? Evolution 52, 1521-1527. (doi:10.2307/2411323)
9. Coulon, A., Cosson, J., Angibault, J., Cargnelutti, B., Galan, M., Morellet, N., Petit, E., Aulagnier, S. & Hewison, A. 2004 Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2841-2850. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02253.x)
10. D'Anatro, A. & Lessa, E. 2006 Geometric morphometric analysis of geographic variation in the Rio Negro tuco-tuco, Ctenomys rionegrensis (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Mamm. Biol. 71, 288-298. (doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2006.02.001)
11. D'Elia, G., Lessa, E. & Cook, J. 1998 Geographic structure, gene flow, and maintenance of melanism in Ctenomys rionegrensis (Rodentia: Octodontidae). Z. Saugetierkd. 63, 285-296.
12. Dixon, J. D., Oli, M. K., Wooten, M. C., Eason, T. H., McCown, J. W. & Cunningham, M. W. 2007 Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation and loss: the case of the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus). Conserv. Genet. 8, 455-464. (doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9184-z)
13. Florin, A. B. & Hoglund, J. 2007 Absence of population structure of turbot (Psetta maxima) in the Baltic Sea. Mol. Ecol. 16, 115-126. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03120.x)
14. Foll, M. & Gaggiotti, O. E. 2006 Identifying the environmental factors that determine the genetic structure of populations. Genetics 174, 875-891. (doi:10.1534/genetics.106.059451)
15. Krupa, J. J. & Geluso, K. N. 2000 Matching the color of excavated soil: cryptic coloration in the plains pocket gopher (Geomys bursarius). J. Mammal. 81, 86-96. (doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081〈0086: MTCOES〉2.0.CO;2)
16. Lacey, E. 2000 Spatial and social systems of subterranean rodents. In Life underground: the biology of subterranean rodents (eds E. Lacey, J. Patton & G. Cameron), pp. 257-296. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Lessa, E. & Cook, J. 1998 The molecular phylogenetics of tuco-tucos (genus Ctenomys, Rodentia: Octodontidae) suggests an early burst of speciation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 88-99. (doi:10.1006/mpev. 1997.0445)
18. Lessa, E. & Thaeler, C. 1989 A reassessment of morphological specializations for digging in pocket gophers. J. Mammal. 70, 689-700. (doi:10.2307/1381704)
19. Massarini, A. & de Freitas, T. 2005 Morphological and cytogenetics comparison in species of the mendocinus group (genus Ctenomys) with emphasis in C. australis and C. flamarioni (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Caryologia 58, 21-27.
20. Matocq, M., Patton, J. & da Silva, M. 2000 Population genetic structure of two ecologically distinct Amazonian spiny rats: separating history and current ecology. Evolution 54, 1423-1432.
21. McRae, B. H. 2006 Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60, 1551-1561.
22. Mora, M. S., Lessa, E. P., Kittlein, M. J. & Vassallo, A. I. 2006 Phylogeography of the subterranean rodent Ctenomys australis in sand-dune habitats: evidence of population expansion. J. Mammal. 87, 1192-1203. (doi:10.1644/05-MAMM-A-399R1.1)
23. Reig, O., Busch, C., Ortells, M. & Contreras, J. 1990 An overview of evolution, systematics, population biology, cytogenetics, molecular biology and speciation in Ctenomys. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 335, 71-96.
24. Slatkin, M. 1993 Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47, 264-279. (doi:10.2307/2410134)
25. Spear, S., Peterson, C., Matocq, M. & Storfer, A. 2005 Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum). Mol. Ecol. 14, 2553-2564. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02573.x)
26. Sprechmann, P. 1978 The paleoecology and paleogeography of the Uruguayan coastal area during the neogene and quaternary. Zitteliana 4, 3-72.
27. Vuilleumier, S. & Fontanillas, P. 2007 Landscape structure affects dispersal in the greater white-toothed shrew: inference between genetic and simulated ecological distances. Ecol. Mod. 201, 369-376. (doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.002)
28. Wlasiuk, G., Garza, J. C. & Lessa, E. P. 2003 Genetic and geographic differentiation in the Rio Negro tuco-tuco (Ctenomys rionegrensis): inferring the roles of migration and drift from multiple genetic markers. Evolution 57, 913-926. (doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0913: GAGDIT]2.0.CO;2)