Negotiation support models for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest margins

Ecology and Society

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2002, Pages

  Van Noordwijk, Meine ^a,b   Tomich, Thomas P ^c   Verbist, Bruno ^c  

^a International Centre for Research in Agroforestry   (Indonesia)

^b WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Adaptive learning; Adaptive options; Agroforests; Indonesia; Integrated natural resource management; Land use change scenarios; Negotiation support models; Quantitative impact assessments; Scaling rules; Stakeholders; Sustainability assessments

Indexed keywords

EID: 54249101052     PISSN: 17083087     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/es-00344-050221     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Calder, I. R. 1999. The Blue revolution: land use and integrated water resources management. Earthscan, London, UK.
2. de Kok, J. L., and H. G. Wind. 1999. Methodology for sustainable coastal management in the tropics. The integrative research. Enschede, Department of Civil Engineering Technology and Management, Faculty of Technology and Management, Twente University, Enschede, The Netherlands.
3. Douglas, S. 1999. Tropical forest diversity, environmental change and species augmentation: after the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Journal of Vegetation Science 10:851-860.
4. Izac, A. M. N. 1998. Assessing the impact of research in natural resources management: synthesis of an international workshop 27-29 April 1998, Nairobi, Kenya. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya.
5. Izac, A. M. N., and P. A. Sanchez. 2001. Towards a natural resource management paradigm for international agriculture: the example of agroforestry research. Agricultural Systems 69:5-25.
6. Jepma, C. J. 1995. Tropical deforestation: a socio-economic approach. Earthscan, London, UK.
7. Kaimowitz, D., and A. Angelsen. 1998. Economic models of tropical deforestation: a review. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
8. Lefroy, E. C., and R. J. Stirzaker. 1999. Agroforestry for water management in the cropping systems of southern Australia. Agroforestry Systems 45:277-302.
9. Lovell, C., A. Mandondo, and P. Moriarty. 2002. The question of scale in integrated natural resource management. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 25. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol5/iss2/art25/index.html.
10. Miser, H. J., and E. S. Quade, editors. 1985. Handbook of systems analysis: overview of uses, procedures, applications, and practice. Elsevier, New York, New York, USA.
11. Nyhus, P., and R. Tilson. In press. Agroforestry, elephants, and tigers: Balancing conservation theory and practice in human-dominated landscapes of Southeast Asia. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment.
12. Randers, J., editor. 1980. Elements of the system dynamics method. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
13. Sanchez, P. 1995. Science in agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 30:5-55.
14. Sinclair, F. L., and D. H. Walker. 1998. Acquiring qualitative knowledge about complex agroecosystems. 1. Representation as natural language. Agricultural Systems 56:341-363.
15. Tomich, T. P. 1992. Sustaining agricultural development in harsh environments: insights from private land reclamation in Egypt. World Development 20(2):261-274.
16. Tomich, T. P., P. Kilby, and B. F. Johnston. 1995. Transforming agrarian economies: opportunities seized, opportunities missed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
17. Tomich, T. P., M. van Noordwijk, S. Vosti, and J. Whitcover. 1998a. Agricultural development with rainforest conservation: Methods for seeking best bet alternatives to slash-and-burn, with applications to Brazil and Indonesia. Agricultural Economics 19:159-174.
18. Tomich, T. P., M. van Noordwijk, S. Budidarseno, A. Gillison, T. Kusumanto, D. Murdiyarso, F. Stolle, and A. M. Fagi. 1998b. Alternatives to slash-and-burn in Indonesia. Summary report and synthesis of Phase II. ICRAF (International Centre for Research in Agroforestry) S.E. Asia, Bogor, Indonesia.
19. Tomich, T. P., M. van Noordwijk, and D. E. Thomas, editors. 1999. Research abstracts and key policy questions on environmental services and land use change; bridging the gap between policy and research in Southeast Asia. Report Number 10. ICRAF (International Centre for Research in Agroforestry), Bogor. ASB-Indonesia.
20. Tomich, T. P., M. van Noordwijk, S. Budidarseno, A. Gillison, T. Kusumanto, D. Murdiyarso, F. Stolle, and A. M. Fagi. 2001 Agricultural intensification, deforestation, and the environment: assessing tradeoffs in Sumatra, Indonesia. Pages 221-244 in D. Lee and C. Barrett, editors. Tradeoffs or synergies? Agricultural intensification, economic development and the environment. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
21. Vanclay, J. K. 1995. Modelling to explore land use patterns at the forest edge: objectives and model design. Pages 113-116 in P. Binning, H. Bridgman, and B. Williams, editors. Proceedings of the International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM '95). 27-30 November 1995, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
22. van de Giesen, N. C., T. J. Stomph, and N. De Ridder. 2000. Scale effects of Hortonian overland flow and rainfall-runoff dynamics in a West African catena landscape. Hydrological Processes 14:165-175.
23. van Noordwijk, M. 1994. Agroforestry as reclamation pathway for Imperata grassland use by smallholders. Pages 2-10 in Proceedings of a Panel Discussion on Management of Imperata Control and Transfer of Technology for Smallholder Rubber Farming System. Balai Penelitian Sembawa, Pusat Penelitian Karet Indonesia (ISBN 979-608-004-3).
24. van Noordwijk, M. 1999a. Productivity of intensified crop fallow rotations in the Trenbath model. Agroforestry Systems 47:223-237.
25. van Noordwijk, M. 1999b. Scale effects in crop fallow rotations. Agroforestry Systems 47:239-251.
26. van Noordwijk, M. 1999c. Nutrient cycling in ecosystems versus nutrient budgets of agricultural systems. Pages 1-26 in E. Smaling, O. Oenema, and L. Fresco, editors. Nutrient cycles and nutrient budgets in global agro-ecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
27. van Noordwijk, M. In press. Scaling trade-offs between crop productivity, carbon stocks and biodiversity in shifting cultivation landscape mosaics: the FALLOW model. Ecological Modeling.
28. van Noordwijk, M., and C. K. Ong. 1999. Can the ecosystem mimic hypotheses be applied to farms in African savannahs? Agroforestry Systems 45:131-158.
29. van Noordwijk, M., T. P. Tomich, R. Winahyu, D. Murdiyarso, S. Partoharjono, and A.M. Fagi, editors. 1995. Alternatives to slash-and-burn in Indonesia. Summary Report of Phase 1. ASB-Indonesia Report Number 4, Bogor, Indonesia.
30. van Noordwijk, M., T. P. Tomich, H. de Foresta, and G. Michon. 1997a. To segregate or to integrate: the question of balance between production and biodiversity conservation in complex agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Today 9(1):6-9.
31. van Noordwijk, M., P. Woomer, C. Cerri, M. Bernoux, and K. Nugroho. 1997b. Soil carbon in the humid tropical forest zone. Geoderma 79:187-225.
32. van Noordwijk, M., D. Murdiyarso, K. Hairiah, U. R. Wasrin, A. Rachman, and T. P. Tomich. 1998a. Forest soils under alternatives to slash-and-burn agriculture in Sumatra, Indonesia. Pages 175-185 in A. Schulte and D. Ruhiyat, editors. Soils of tropical forest ecosystems: characteristics, ecology and management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
33. van Noordwijk, M., M. van Roode, E. L. McCallie, and B. Lusiana. 1998b. Erosion and sedimentation as multiscale, fractal processes: implications for models, experiments and the real world. Pages 223-253 in F. Penning de Vries, F. Agus, and J. Kerr, editors. Soil erosion at multiple scales: principles and methods for assessing causes and impacts. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
34. Van Noordwijk, M., J. Poulsen, and P. M. Ericksen. In press. Filters, flows and fallacies: Methods for quantifying external effects of land use change. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment.
35. Walker, D. H., and F. L. Sinclair. 1998. Acquiring qualitative knowledge about complex agroecosystems. 2. Formal representation. Agricultural Systems 56:365-386.
36. Walker, D. H., P. . Thorne, F. L. Sinclair, B. Thapa, C. D. Wood, and D. B. Subba. 1999. A systems approach to comparing indigenous and scientific knowledge: consistency and discriminatory power of indigenous and laboratory assessment of the nutritive value of tree fodder. Agricultural Systems 62:87-103