"I follow you if you are a good leader in my eyes, because then I can identify with you." How subordinates' openness towards influence is mediated by identification processes;"Ich folge dir, wenn du in meinen augen eine gute führungskraft bist, denn dann kann ich mich auch mit dir identifizieren." Wie einflussoffenheit von untergebenen über identifikationsprozesse vermittelt wird

Zeitschrift fur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 169-181

  Eckloff, Tilman ^a   Van Quaquebeke, Niels ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Identification; Implicit leadership theories; Leader categorization; Openness towards influence; Respect

Indexed keywords

EID: 54149085429     PISSN: 09324089     EISSN: 21906270     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0932-4089.52.4.169     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aron, A. (2003). Self and close relationships. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 442-461). New York: The Guilford Press.
2. Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
3. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803-832.
5. Brewer, M. B. & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
6. Brown, D. J. & Lord, R. G. (2001). Leadership and perceiver cognition: Moving beyond first order constructs. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations (pp. 181-202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C. & House, R. J. (Eds.). (2007). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.
8. Darwall, S. L. (1977). Two kinds of respect. Ethics, 88, 36-49.
9. Dillon, R. S. (2007). Respect: A philosophical perspective. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38, 201-212.
10. Epitropaki, O. & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659-676.
11. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S. & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions. American Psychologist, 59, 93-104.
12. Graen, G. B. & Scandura, T. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
14. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
15. Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462-479). New York: The Guilford Press.
16. Hollander, E. P. & Offermann, L. R. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: Relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45, 179-189.
17. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W. & Gupta, V (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations - The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
18. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Judge, T. A., Woolf, E. F., Hurst, C. & Livingston, B. (2006). Charismatic and transformational leadership. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 203-214.
20. Kark, R., Shamir, B. & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 246-255.
21. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60.
22. Kenney, R. A., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M. & Blascovich, J. (1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1128-1143.
23. Kernis, M. H. & Goldman, B. M. (2003). Stability and variability in self-concept and self-esteem. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 106-127). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
24. Kihlstrom, J. F., Beer, J. S. & Klein, S. B. (2003). Self and identity as memory. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 68-90). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
25. Knippenberg, D. van & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations. London: Sage.
26. Knippenberg, D. van, van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D. & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825-856.
27. Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of self and identity. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
28. Lord, R. G. & Brown, D. J. (2004). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J. & Freiberg, S. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 78, 167-203.
30. Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J. & DeVader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
31. Lord, R. G. & Maher, K. J. (1993). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
32. Mael, F. A. & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
33. Markus, H. & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
34. Maurer, T. J. & Lord, R. G. (1991). An exploration of cognitive demands in group interaction as a moderator of information processing variables in perceptions of leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 821-839.
35. Nye, J. L. (2005). Implicit theories and leadership perceptions in the thick of it: The effects of prototype matching, group setbacks, and group outcomes. In B. Schyns & J. R. Meindl (Eds.), The leadership horizon series (Vol. 3). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
36. Nye, J. L. & Forsynth, D. R. (1991). The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals: A test of leadership categorization theory. Small Group Research, 22, 360-375.
37. Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., MacKenzie, S. B. & Lee, J.-Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
38. Podsakoff, P. M. & Schriesheim, C. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387-411.
39. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Gofrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversation (pp. 171-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. S. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
41. Quaquebeke, N. van (2008). Respect & leadership - A psychological perspective. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.
42. Quaquebeke, N. van & Brodbeck, F. C. (in Druck). Entwicklung und Validierung zweier Instrumente zur Erfassung von Führungskräfte- Kategorisierung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie.
43. Quaquebeke, N. van, Henrich, D. C. & Eckloff, T. (2007). "It's not tolerance I'm asking for, it's respect!" A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38, 185-200.
44. Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243-256.
45. Schyns, B. (2006). Are group consensus in LMX and shared work values related to organizational outcomes? Small Group Research, 37, 20-35.
46. Sedikides, C. & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
47. Sedikides, C. & Gregg, A. (2003). Portraits of the self. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 110-138). London: Sage.
48. Shamir, B. & Kark, R. (2004). A single-item graphic scale for the measurement of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77, 115-123.
49. Shamir, B., Pillai, R., Bligh, M. C. & Uhl-Bien, M. (Eds.). (2006). Follower-centred perspectives on leadership. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
50. Taylor, S. E. & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 89-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
52. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U, Stellmacher, J. & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77, 171-191.
53. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Yukl, G. A. & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 132-140.