Randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing compared with drug information and advice for early intervention among young cannabis users

Addiction

Volumn 103, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1809-1818

  McCambridge, Jim ^a,b   Slym, Renee L ^b   Strang, John ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Advice; Alcohol; Brief intervention; Cannabis; Fidelity; Motivational interviewing; Tobacco; Young people

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING CESSATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; COUNSELING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MARIJUANA SMOKING; MOTIVATION; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; SMOKING CESSATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 54049158463     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02331.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2006. Available at: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/world_drug_report.html (accessed 4 February 2007).
2. Macleod J., Oakes R., Copello A., Crome I., Egger M., Hickman M. et al. Psychological and social sequelae of cannabis and other illicit drug use by young people: a systematic review of longitudinal, general population studies. Lancet 2004 363 : 1579 88.
3. Faggiano F., Vigna-Taglianti F. D., Versino E., Zambon A., Borraccino A., Lemma P. School-based prevention for illicit drugs' use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 issue 2 : Art. no.: CD003020. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD003020.pub2.
4. Gates S., McCambridge J., Smith L. A., Foxcroft D. R. Interventions for prevention of drug use by young people delivered in non-school settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 issue 1 : Art. no.: CD005030. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005030.pub2.
5. Miller W. R., Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd edn. New York : Guilford Press 2002.
6. McCambridge J., Strang J. Development of a structured generic drug intervention model: a brief application of motivational interviewing with young people. Drug Alcohol Rev 2003 22 : 391 9.
7. McCambridge J., Strang J. The efficacy of single session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomised trial. Addiction 2004 99 : 39 52.
8. McCambridge J., Strang J. Deterioration over time in effect of motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and related risk among young people. Addiction 2005 100 : 470 8.
9. Miller W. R., Sovereign R. G., Krege B. Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The drinker's check-up as a preventive intervention. Behav Psychother 1988 16 : 251 68.
10. Walker D. D., Roffman R. A., Stephens R. S., Wakana K., Berghuis J., Kim W. Motivational enhancement therapy for adolescent marijuana users: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006 74 : 628 32.
11. Martin G., Copeland J. The adolescent cannabis check-up: randomized trial of a brief intervention for young cannabis users. J Subst Abuse Treat 2008 34 : 407 14.
12. Strang J., McCambridge J. Is it possible for practitioner ratings to predict outcome in motivational interviewing? J Subst Abuse Treat 2004 27 : 83 8.
13. Office for National Statistics. Social Trends 31. London : The Stationery Office 2001.
14. Moyers T. B., Martin T., Manuel J. K., Hendrickson S. M., Miller W. R. Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing. J Subst Abuse Treat 2005 28 : 19 26.
15. Faulkner N., McCambridge J., Slym R. L., Rollnick S. It ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it? A qualitative study of advice for young cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008 (in press).
16. Martin G., Copeland J., Gates P., Gilmour S. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) in an adolescent population of cannabis users: reliability, validity and diagnostic cut-off. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006 83 : 90 3.
17. Copeland J., Gilmour S., Gates P., Swift W. The Cannabis Problems Questionnaire: factor structure, reliability, and validity. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005 80 : 313 19.
18. Babor T. F., Higgins-Biddle J. C., Saunders J. B., Monteiro M. G. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. Geneva : World Health Organization WHO/MSD/MSB/01.6a 2001. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_MSD_MSB_01.6a.pdf (accessed 4 February 2007).
19. Heatherton T. F., Kozlowski L. T., Frecker R. C., Fagerstrom K. O. The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991 86 : 1119 27.
20. Werch C. E., Lundstrum R. H., Moore A. Bogus-pipeline effects on self-reported college student drug use, problems and attitudes. Int J Addict 1989 24 : 1003 10.
21. Miller W. R., Yahne C. E., Moyers T. B., Martinez J., Pirritano M. A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004 72 : 1050 62.
22. Gray E., McCambridge J., Strang J. The effectiveness of motivational interviewing delivered by youth workers in reducing drinking, cigarette and cannabis smoking among young people: quasi-experimental pilot study. Alcohol Alcohol 2005 40 : 535 9.
23. Rubak S., Sandbaek A., Lauritzen T., Christenses B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005 55 : 305 12.
24. Caulkins J. P., Liccardo Pacula R., Paddock S., Chiesa J. What we can - and cannot - expect from school-based drug prevention. Drug Alcohol Rev 2004 23 : 79 87.