French National Authority for Health (HAS) report on changes in recommended bandaging practice for acute and chronic wounds. How and why? Principal results and practical consequences;Rapport de la Haute Autorité de santé sur la révision des pansements dans les plaies aiguës et chroniques. Pourquoi ? Comment ? Principaux résultats et conséquences pratiques

Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie

Volumn 135, Issue 6-7, 2008, Pages 441-445

  Chaby, G ^a   Vaneau, M ^b   Senet, P ^c,d   Guillot, B ^e   Chosidow, O ^d  

^a AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Ancien Délégué Général de la Fédération de l'Hospitalisation Privée   (France)

^c HÔPITAL CHARLES FOIX   (France)

^d HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^e MONTPELLIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; BANDAGING TECHNIQUE; CHRONIC WOUND; EDITORIAL; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; HYDROCOLLOID DRESSING; HYDROGEL DRESSING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; TREATMENT INDICATION; WOUND ASSESSMENT; WOUND CARE; BANDAGE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSENSUS; INJURY; META ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; WOUND HEALING;

ACUTE DISEASE; BANDAGES; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSENSUS; FRANCE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; WOUND HEALING; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 54049157877     PISSN: 01519638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2008.04.003     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. www.has.fr. « Pansements primaires et secondaires » révision des descriptions génériques de la liste des produits et prestations remboursables (consulté le 28.05.08).
2. Chaby G., Senet P., Vaneau M., Martel P., Guillaume J.C., Meaume S., et al. Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: A systematic review. Arch Dermatol 143 (2007) 1297-1304
3. Vaneau M., Chaby G., Guillot B., Martel P., Senet P., Teot L., et al. Clinical value of dressings for chronic and acute wounds as assessed by a formal consensus method. Arch Dermatol 143 (2007) 1291-1294
4. Sackett D.L. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 95 Suppl. 2 (1989) 2S-4S
5. Moher D., Schultz K.F., Altman D.G., and for the CONSORT group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357 (2001) 1191-1194
6. Bases méthodologiques pour l'élaboration de recommandations professionnelles par consensus formalisé, HAS Janvier 2006.
7. Singh A., Halder S., Menon G.R., et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds. Asian J Surg 27 (2004) 326-332
8. Bradley M., Cullum N., Nelson E.A., Petticrew M., Sheldon T., and Torgerson D. Systematic reviews of wound care management (2). Dressings and topical agents used in the healing of chronic wounds. Health Technol Assess 3 (1999) 1-35
9. Bouza C., Saz Z., Munoz A., and Amate J.M. Efficacy of advanced dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care 14 (2005) 193-199
10. Belmin J., Meaume S., Rabus M.T., and Bohbot S. Sequential treatment with calcium alginate dressings and hydrocolloid dressings accelerates pressure ulcer healing in older subjects: a multicenter randomized trial of sequential versus non sequential treatment with hydrocolloid dressings alone. J Am Geriatr Soc 50 (2002) 269-274
11. Sayag J., Meaume S., and Bohbot S. Healing properties of calcium alginate dressings. J Wound Care 5 (1996) 357-362
12. Innes M.E., Umraw N., Fish J.S., Gomez M., and Cartotto R.C. The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: a prospective, controlled matched pair study. Burns 27 (2001) 621-627
13. Barnea Y., Amir A., Leshem D., et al. Clinical comparative study of Aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment. Ann Plast Surg 5313 (2004) 2-6