Application of nanofiltration for the rejection of nickel ions from aqueous solutions and estimation of membrane transport parameters

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 160, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 70-77

  Murthy, Z V P ^a   Chaudhari, Latesh B ^a  

^a SARDAR VALLABHBHAI NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Concentration polarization modulus; Membrane transport model; Peclet number

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); ELECTROLYSIS; IONS; MASS TRANSFER; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; NICKEL; NICKEL ALLOYS; PECLET NUMBER; PH; POLARIZATION; POLYMERS; SOLUTIONS; WASTEWATER; WATER FILTRATION;

ACTIVE SKINS; APPLIED PRESSURES; AQUEOUS; AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION MODULUS; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATIONS; ENRICHMENT FACTORS; EXPERIMENTAL DATUM; FEED CONCENTRATIONS; FEED PRESSURES; FILM COMPOSITES; FILM THEORIES; INITIAL FEED CONCENTRATIONS; MASS TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS; MEMBRANE THICKNESSES; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT MODEL; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT MODELS; MEMBRANE TRANSPORTS; NICKEL IONS; OPERATING VARIABLES; PERMEATE FLUXES; POLYAMIDE NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

PH EFFECTS;

NICKEL; POLYAMIDE;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ESTIMATION METHOD; FILTRATION; MEMBRANE; NICKEL; TRANSPORT PROCESS; WASTEWATER;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FLOW RATE; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NANOFILTRATION; PH MEASUREMENT; WASTE WATER;

DIFFUSION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NICKEL; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; SOLUTIONS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 54049152022     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.085     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Fane A.G. Membranes for water production and wastewater reuse. Desalination 106 (1996) 1-9
2. Fane A.G., Yeo A., Law A., Parameshwaran K., Wicaksana F., and Chen V. Low pressure membrane processes-doing more with less energy. Desalination 185 (2005) 159-165
3. Ahn K.H., Song K.G., Cha H.Y., and Yeom I.T. Removal of ions in nickel electroplating rinse water using low-pressure nanofiltration. Desalination 122 (1999) 77-84
4. Mohammad A.W., Othaman R., and Hilal N. Potential use of nanofiltration membranes in treatment of industrial wastewater from Ni-P electroless plating. Desalination 168 (2004) 241-252
5. Nystrom M. Separation of metal sulfates and nitrates from their acids using nanofiltration. Membr. Technol. 117 (2000) 5-9
6. Ballet G.T., Gzara L., Hafiane A., and Dhahbi M. Transport coefficients and cadmium salt rejection in nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 167 (2004) 369-376
7. Garba Y., Taha S., Cabon J., and Dorange G. Modeling of cadmium salts rejection through a nanofiltration membrane: relationships between solute concentration and transport parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 211 (2003) 51-58
8. Ahmed M.T., Tahab S., Maachi R., and Dorange G. The influence of physico-chemistry on the retention of chromium ions during nanofiltration. Desalination 145 (2002) 103-108
9. Qdais H.A., and Moussa H. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater by membrane processes: a comparative study. Desalination 164 (2004) 105-110
10. Ku Y., Chen S.W., and Wang W.Y. Effect of solution composition on the removal of copper ions by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 43 (2005) 135-142
11. Tanninen J., Manttari M., and Nystrom M. Nanofiltration of concentrated acidic copper sulphate solutions. Desalination 189 (2006) 92-96
12. Saitua H., Campderros M., Cerutti S., and Padilla A.P. Effect of operating conditions in removal of arsenic from water by nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 172 (2005) 173-180
13. Banerjee P., DasGupta S., and De S. Removal of dye from aqueous solution using a combination of advanced oxidation process and nanofiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 140 (2007) 95-103
14. Lhassani A., Rumeau M., Benjelloun D., and Pontie M. Selective demineralization of water by nanofiltration: application to the defluorination of brackish water. Water Res. 35 (2001) 3260-3264
15. Pontie M., Diawara C., Rumeau M., Aureau D., and Hemmery P. Seawater nanofiltration (NF): fiction or reality?. Desalination 158 (2003) 277-280
16. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., and Nystrom M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 265 (2005) 160-166
17. Cuartas U.B., Vincent V.M.C., Alvarez B.S., Alcaina M.M.I., and Soriano C.E. Nanofiltration of sweet whey and prediction of lactose retention as a function of permeate flux using the Kedem-Spiegler and Donnan Steric Partioning models. Sep. Purif. Technol. 56 (2007) 38-46
18. Ahmad A.L., and Ooi B.S. Properties performance of thin film composites membrane: study on trimesoyl chloride content and polymerization time. J. Membr. Sci. 255 (2005) 67-77
19. Straatsma J., Bargeman G., van der Horst H.C., and Wesselingh J.A. Can nanofiltration be fully predicted by a model?. J. Membr. Sci. 198 (2002) 273-284
20. Bowen W., Jones M., Welfoot J., and Yousef H. Predicting salt rejections at nanofiltration membranes using artificial neural networks. Desalination 129 (2000) 147-162
21. Kedem O., and Spiegler K. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes. Desalination 1 (1966) 311-326
22. Pusch W. Determination of transport parameters of synthetic membranes by hyperfiltration experiments. Part I. Derivation of transport relationship from linear relations of thermodynamics of irreversible processes. Ber. Bunsen. Phys. Chem. 81 (1977) 269-276
23. Al-Zoubi H., Hilal N., Darwish N.A., and Mohammad A.W. Rejection and modelling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler-Kedem model. Desalination 206 (2007) 42-60
24. Koter S. Determination of the parameters of the Spiegler-Kedem-Katchalsky model for nanofiltration of single electrolyte solutions. Desalination 198 (2006) 335-345
25. Murthy Z.V.P., and Gupta S.K. Estimation of mass transfer coefficient using a combined nonlinear membrane transport and film theory model. Desalination 109 (1997) 39-49
26. Clesceri L.S., Greenberg A.E., and Eaton A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. (1998), American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC
27. Wijmans J.G., and Baker R.W. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 107 (1995) 1-21
28. Mason E.A., and Lonsdale H.K. Review statistical-mechanical theory of membrane transport. J. Membr. Sci. 51 (1990) 1-81
29. Soltanieh M., and Gill W.N. Review of reverse osmosis membranes and transport models. Chem. Eng. Commun. 12 (1981) 279-363
30. Vaidya S.Y., Simaria A.V., and Murthy Z.V.P. Reverse osmosis transport models evaluation: a new approach. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 8 (2001) 335-343
31. Baker R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications. 2nd ed. (2004), John Wiley & Sons Inc., NJ
32. Gupta V.K., Hwang S.T., Krantz W.B., and Greenberg A.R. Characterization of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane performance for aqueous salt solutions using irreversible thermodynamics. Desalination 208 (2007) 1-18
33. Mehiguene K., Garba Y., Taha S., Gondrexon N., and Dorange G. Influence of operating conditions on the retention of copper and cadmium in aqueous solutions by nanofiltration: experimental results and modeling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 15 (1999) 181-187
34. Afonso M.D. Surface charge on loose nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 191 (2006) 262-272
35. Murthy Z.V.P., and Gupta S.K. Simple graphical method to estimate membrane transport parameters and mass transfer coefficient in a membrane cell. Sep. Sci. Technol. 31 (1996) 77-94
36. Murthy Z.V.P., and Gupta S.K. Sodium cyanide separation and parameters estimation for reverse osmosis thinfilm composite polyamide membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 154 (1999) 89-103
37. Frares N., Taha S., and Dorange G. Influence of the operating conditions on the elimination of zinc ions by nanofiltration. Desalination 185 (2005) 245-253
38. Bandini S., Drei J., and Vezzani D. The role of pH and concentration on the ion rejection in polyamide nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 264 (2005) 65-74
39. Freger V., Arnot T.C., and Howell J.A. Separation of concentrated organic/inorganic salt mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 178 (2000) 185-193
40. Bazaraa M.S., Sherali H.D., and Shetty C.M. Nonlinear Programming Theory and Algorithms. 2nd ed. (1993), John Wiley & Sons, NY
41. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Togoh M., Nakao S.I., and Kimura S. Transport of organic electrolytes with electrostatic and steric-hindrance effects through nanofiltration membranes. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 28 (1995) 372-380
42. Porter M.C. Membrane filtration. In: Schweitzer P.A. (Ed). Handbook of Separation Techniques for Chemical Engineers. 3rd ed. (1997), McGraw-Hill, NY pp 2-3 to 2-101