The risks of being hysterical

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 499-500

  Kotecha, Aachal ^a,b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA THICKNESS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EDITORIAL; ELASTICITY; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PREDICTION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCLERA DISEASE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

CORNEA; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC DISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; VISCOSITY;

EID: 54049150836     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01842.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 714-20.
2. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: Quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 146-55.
3. Oliveira C, Tello C, Liebmann J, Ritch R. Central corneal thickness is not related to anterior scleral thickness or axial length. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 190-4.
4. Jonas JB, Holbach L. Central corneal thickness and thickness of the lamina cribrosa in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 1275-9.
5. Pakravan M, Parsa A, Sanagou M, Parsa CF. Central corneal thickness and correlation to optic disc size: A potential link for susceptibility to glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91: 26-8.
6. Asaoka R, Kotecha A, White E, Garway-Heath DF. The effects of maximum air pressure and intraocular pressure on corneal hysteresis measurements with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: E-Abstract 703.
7. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 5337-47.
8. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 39-47.
9. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156-62.
10. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008; 36: 508-13.
11. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 868-75.
12. Wells AP, Garway-Heath DT, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KC, Sachdev N. Corneal biomechanics and optic nerve head compliance: Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface deformation in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 3262-8.
13. Downs JC, Suh JK, Thomas KA, Belleza AJ, Hart RT, Burgoyne CF. Viscoelastic material properties of the peripapillary sclera in normal and early-glaucoma monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 540-6.