Retrieving object color: The influence of color congruity and test format

NeuroReport

Volumn 19, Issue 14, 2008, Pages 1387-1390

  Cycowicz, Yael M ^a   Nessler, Doreen ^a   Horton, Cort ^b   Friedman, David ^a  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Familiarity; Recognitionmemory; Recollection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; COLOR VISION; COLOR VISION TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; COLOR PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 54049150519     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32830c8df1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hirshman E, Whelley MM, Palu M. An investigation of paradoxical memory effects. J Mem Lang 1989; 28:594-609.
2. Nicolas S, Marchal A. Implicit memory, explicit memory and the picture bizarreness effect. Acta Psychologica 1998; 99:43-58.
3. Riefer DM, Lamay ML. Memory for common and bizarre stimuli: a storage-retrieval analysis. Psychon Bull Rev 1998; 5:312-317.
4. Michelon P, Snyder AZ, Buckner RL, McAvoy M, Zacks JM. Neural correlates of incongruous visual information. An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2003; 19:1612-1626.
5. Brewer JB, Zhao Z, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE. Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science 1998; 281:1185-1187.
6. Nessler D, Johnson R, Bersick M, Friedman D. On why the elderly have normal semantic retrieval but deficient episodic encoding: a study of left inferior frontal ERP activity. Neuroimage 2006; 30:299-312.
7. Wagner AD, Schacter DL, Koutstaal MRW, Maril A, Dale AM, Rosen BR, et al. Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science 1998; 281:1188-1191.
8. Craik FI. Levels of processing: past, present and future? Memory 2002; 10:305-318.
9. Yonelinas AP. The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. J Mem Lang 2002; 46:441-517.
10. Kuo TY, Van Petten C. Prefrontal engagement during source memory retrieval depends on the prior encoding task. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18:1133-1146.
11. Jacoby LL. A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J Mem Lang 1991; 30:513-541.
12. Friedman D, Johnson R. Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review. Microsc Res Tech 2000; 51:6-28.
13. Paller KA, Voss JL, Boehm SG. Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11:243-250.
14. Rugg MD, Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11:251-257.
15. Berman S, Friedman D, Hamberger M, Snodgrass JG. Developmental picture norms: relationships between name agreement, familiarity and visual complexity for child and adult ratings of two sets of line drawings. Behav Res Meth Instr Comp 1989; 21371-21382:371-382.
16. Cycowicz YM, Friedman D, Rothstein M, Snodgrass JG. Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Child Psychol 1997; 65:171-237.
17. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol: Hum Learn Mem 1980; 6:174-215.
18. Cycowicz YM, Friedman D, Snodgrass JG. Remembering the color of objects: an ERP investigation of source memory. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11: 322-334.
19. Nuwer MR, Comi G, Emerson R, Fugslang-Frederiksen A, Guerit JM, Hinrichs H, et al. IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 106:259-261.
20. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55:468-484.
21. Snodgrass JG, Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. J Exp Psychol General 1988; 117:34-50.
22. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 72:184-187.
23. McCarthy G, Wood CC. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62:203-208.