Assessing the effects of small school size on mathematics achievement: A propensity score-matching approach

Teachers College Record

Volumn 110, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1879-1900

  Wyse, Adam E ^a   Keesler, Venessa ^a   Schneider, Barbara ^a,b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b College of Education ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049100334     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allison, P. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D.-i., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students' attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 627-658.
3. Borman, G., & D'Agostino, J. (1996). Title I and student achievement: A meta-analysis of federal evaluation results. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 309-326.
4. Burkam, D., Ready, D., Lee, V. E., & LoGerfo, L. (2004). Social-class differences in summer learning between kindergarten and first grade: Model specification and estimation. Sociology of Education, 77, 1-31.
5. Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: the impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
6. Dempster, A. P., Laird, M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1), 1-38.
7. Greene, J., & Symonds, W. C. (2006, June 26). Bill Gates gets schooled: Why he and other execs have struggled in their school reform efforts, and why they keep trying. Business Week, pp. 64-70.
8. Herszenhorn, D. M. (2006, September 13). 11 city schools fail to meet state criteria. The New York Times, p. 8.
9. Hoffer, T. (1995). High school curriculum differentiation and postsecondary outcomes. In P. W. Cookson & B. Schneider (Eds.), Transforming schools (pp. 371-402). New York: Garland.
10. Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Effects of kindergarten retention policy on children's cognitive growth in reading and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 205-224.
11. Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2006). Evaluating kindergarten retention policy: A case study of casual inference for multilevel observational data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 901-910.
12. Huebner, T. A. (2005). Rethinking high school: An introduction to New York City's experience. San Francisco: WestEd for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
13. Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37.
14. Kahne, J. E., Sporte, S. E., de la Torre, M., & Easton, J. (2006). Small high schools on a larger scale: The first three years of the Chicago High School Redesign Initiative. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.
15. Lee, V. E. (2000). School size and the organization of secondary schools. In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 327-344). New York: Kluwer/Academic Plenum.
16. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68, 241-270.
17. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. (1997). High school size: which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 205-227.
18. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Loveless, T., & Hess, F. M. (2007). Brookings papers on education policy 2006/2007. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
20. McLachlan, G. J., & Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.
21. Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13, 125-145.
22. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, §115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
23. Petrin, R. (2005). School organization, curricular structure, and the distribution and effects of instruction for tenth-grade science. In L. V. Hedges & B. Schneider (Eds.), The social organization of schooling (pp. 175-199). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24. Phillips, M. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison of the relationships of communitarian climate and academic climate to mathematics achievement and attendance during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 633-662.
25. Pittman, R. B., & Haughwout, P. (1987). Influence of high school size on dropout rate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 337-343.
26. Porter, A. (1989). A curriculum out of balance: the case of elementary school mathematics. Educational Researcher, 18(5), 9-15.
27. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Ravitch, D. (2006, July 30). Bill Gates, the nation's superintendent of schools [Electronic version]. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 3, 2006, from http://www.latimes.com
29. Raywid, M. A. (1996). Takingstock: The movement to create mini-schools, schools-within-schools, and separate small schools (Urban Diversity Series No. 108). New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education Institute for Urban and Minority Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED396045)
30. Rosenbaum, J. (2002). Observational studies. New York: Springer Verlag.
31. Rosenbaum, J., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
32. Rubin, D. B. (1979). Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 318-328.
33. Rubin, D. B., & Thomas, N. (2000). Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 573-585.
34. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman and Hall.
35. Schneider, B., Swanson, C., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (1998). Opportunities for learning: Course sequences and positional advantages. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 25-53.
36. Schneider, B., Wyse, A. E., & Keesler, V. (2007). Is small really better? Testing some assumptions about high school size. In T. Loveless & F. M. Hess (Eds.), Brookings papers on education policy 2006/2007 (pp. 15-47). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
37. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
38. Shouse, R. (1996). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict, congruence, and implications for student achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 47-68.
39. Shouse, R. (1997). Academic press, sense of community, and student achievement. In J. S. Coleman (Ed.), Redesigning American education (pp. 60-86). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40. Stevenson, D. (2000). The fit and misfit of sociological research and educational policy. In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 547-563). New York: Kluwer Press.
41. Toch T. (1991). In the name of excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Wasley, P. A., Fine, M., Gladden, M., Holland, N. E., King, S. P., Mosak, E., et al. (2000). Small schools: Great strides. A study of new small schools in Chicago. New York: Bank Street College of Education.