Safety and efficacy of carotid angioplasty/stenting in 100 consecutive high surgical risk patients: immediate and long-term follow-up

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 433-439

  AbuRahma, Ali F ^a   Bates, Mark C ^a   Eads, Kris ^a   Armistead, Lauren ^a   Flaherty, Sarah K ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carotid angioplasty stenting; Embolic protection device; High surgical risk; Safety

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN EMBOLISM; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; SAFETY; STENT; STROKE; SURGICAL RISK; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; CAROTID STENOSIS; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENTS; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 54049092798     PISSN: 15385744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1538574408318477     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Mathias K., Jager H., Hennings S., Gissler HM Endoluminal treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis. World J Surg. 2001 ; 25: 328-336.
2. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al, for the SAPPHIRE Investigators. Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004 ; 351: 1493-1501.
3. Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S., et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006 ; 44: 258-269.
4. Setacci C., de Donato G., Chisci E., et al. Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous ? J Endovasc Ther. 2006 ; 13: 302-309.
5. Chaer RA, Derubertis BG, Trocciola SM, et al. Safety and efficacy of carotid angioplasty and stenting in high-risk patients. Am Surg. 2006 ; 72: 694-698.
6. Linfante I., Hirsch JA, Selim M., et al. Safety of latest-generation self-expanding stents in patients with NASCETineligible severe symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis. Arch Neurol. 2004 ; 61: 39-43.
7. Golledge J., Mitchell A., Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH Systematic comparison of early outcome of angioplasty and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery disease. Stroke. 2000 ; 31: 1439-1443.
8. Narins CR, Illig KA Patient selection for carotid stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg. 2006 ; 44: 661-672.
9. O'Riorden M. SECURITY: carotid artery stenting with a distal-protection device safe in high-risk patients. http://www.theheart.org/ viewEntityDispatcherAction.do?legacyId=37977.2003. Accessed July 14, 2006.
10. White C., Iyer S., Hopkins L., Katzen B., Russell M. ; BEACH Trial Investigators. Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 ; 67: 503-512.
11. AbuRahma AF, Bates MC, Stone PA, Wulu JT Comparative study of operative treatment and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for recurrent carotid disease. J Vasc Surg. 2001 ; 34: 831-838.
12. Mas JL, Chatellier G., Beyssen B., et al, for the EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006 ; 355: 1660-1671.
13. The SPACE Collaborative Group. 30-day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2006 ; 368: 1239-1247.