Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement. Update 2008;Lumbale bandscheibenendoprothetik - Update 2008. Metaanalyse der kurz- und langzeitergebnisse

Chirurg

Volumn 79, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 937-943

  Wiedenhofer B ^a   Ewerbeck, V ^a   Suda, A J ^a   Carstens, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Level of evidence; Lumbar total disc replacement; Meta analysis; Short and long term results

Indexed keywords

EID: 54049090692     PISSN: 00094722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-008-1519-5     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Beastall 2007 Spine 32 685
2. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S (2002) Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11 [Suppl 2]: S131-S136
3. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV et al. (2005) The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 1, 30(19): 2230-2236
4. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV et al. (2005) The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 1, 30(19): 2192-2199
5. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Kershaw T et al. (2006) Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 20, 31(9): 992-997
6. Bertagnoli 2006 J Neurosurg Spine 4 85
7. Blumenthal 2003 J Spinal Disord Tech 16 450
8. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD et al. (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and drug administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 15, 30(14): 1565-1575
9. Büttner-Janz 2006 Eur Spine J 15 510
10. Chung 2006 J Spinal Disord Tech 19 411
11. David T (2007) Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 15, 32(6): 661-666
12. Delamarter 2005 Orthop Clin North Am 36 301
13. Etebar S, Cahill DW (1999) Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 90 [Suppl 2]: 163-169
14. Grob 2005 Spine 30 324
15. Hannibal M, Thomas DJ, Low J et al. (2007) ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 1, 32(21): 2322-2326
16. Hochschuler SH, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD et al. (2002) Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 11 [Suppl 2]: S106-S110
17. Huang 2003 J Spinal Disord Tech 16 435
18. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP jr et al. (2005) Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 15, 30(12): 1407-1411
19. Kim 2007 J Neurosurg Spine 7 131
20. Kish MA (2001) Infectious diseases society of america. Guide to development of practice guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 15, 32(6): 851-854
21. Le 2005 Orthop Clin North Am 36 315
22. Lemaire 1997 Clin Orthop Relat Res 337 64
23. Lemaire 2005 J Spinal Disord Tech 18 353
24. Lemaire 2006 J Spinal Disord Tech 18 353
25. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A et al. (2002) Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 11 [Suppl 2]: S124-S130
26. McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy SS et al. (2006) Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE Artificial Disc. Spine 15, 31(11): 1217-1226
27. van 2003 J Spinal Disord Tech 16 369
28. van Ooij A, Kurtz SM, Stessels F et al. (2007) Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charité disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients. Spine 15, 32(2): 223-239
29. Park 2004 Spine 29 1938
30. Punt 2008 Eur Spine J 17 36
31. Putzier 2006 Eur Spine J 15 183
32. Rahm 1996 J Spinal Disord 9 392
33. Regan 2006 Spine 31 2270
34. SariAli 2006 Eur Spine J 15 1501
35. Schmoelz 2006 Eur Spine J 15 1276
36. Schmoelz 2003 J Spinal Disord Tech 16 418
37. Siepe 2006 Spine 31 1923
38. Siepe 2007 Spine 32 782
39. Siepe 2007 Eur Spine J 16 1001
40. Tortolani 2007 J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 82
41. Tropiano 2003 J Spinal Disord Tech 16 362
42. Tropiano 2005 J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 490
43. Trouillier 2006 Eur Spine J 15 174
44. Zigler 2003 J Spinal Disord Tech 16 352
45. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM et al. (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 15, 32(11): 1155-1162