Bayes, bias and plausibility

Homeopathy

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 167-168

  Fisher, Peter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; BAYES THEOREM; EDITORIAL; FORGERY; HOMEOPATHY; INTERNET; METAPHYSICS; PROBABILITY; PUBLICATION;

DECEPTION; HOMEOPATHY; HUMANS; INTERNET;

EID: 53949097361     PISSN: 14754916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2008.09.003     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Rutten A.L.B. How can we change beliefs: a Bayesian perspective. Homeopathy 97 (2008) 214-219 this issue
2. Rutten A.L.B., Stolper C.F., Lugten R.F., and Barthels R.J. Assessing likelihood ratio of clinical symptoms: handling vagueness. Homp 92 (2003) 182-186
3. Rutten A.L.B., Stolper C.F., and Barthels R.W.J.M. New repertory, new considerations. Homp 97 (2008) 16-21
4. Rutten A.L.B., and Stolper C.F. The 2005 meta-analysis of homeopathy: analysis of post-publication data. Homp 97 (2008) 169-177
5. Shang A., Huwiler-Müntener K., Nartey L., et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 366 (2005) 726-732
6. Fisher P., Berman B., Davidson J., et al. Letter to the editor. Lancet 366 (2005) 2082-2083
7. Vithoulkas G. British media attacks on homeopathy: are they justified?. Homp 97 (2008) 103-106
8. [accessed 08.09.08]
9. [accessed 10.09.08]
10. Various authors. The memory of water. Homp (2007) 96