Risk scores and outcomes after cholecystectomy: A comparison between a university hospital and a short-stay clinic - A prospective observational study;Risikoprofil und Ergebnisqualität Nach Cholezystektomie - Ein Vergleich Zwischen Einer Universitäts- und Praxisklinik

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie

Volumn 133, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 498-503

  Schmidt, C ^a,b   Reibe, F ^a   Sellschopp, C ^a   Moller J ^a   Bauer, M ^a   Kremer, B ^a  

^a Die Institutsangaben Sind am Ende des Beitrags Gelistet ^*

^b Muehlenkreiskliniken   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Complications; Length of stay; POSSUM; Risk score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADULT; AGED; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICENTERS;

EID: 53949088664     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1076886     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. QLQ C-30: A Quality of Life Instrument for use in International clinical Trials in Oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365-376
2. Alberty J, Franz D, Leuwer R et al. The G-DRG system 2004 and its interfaces with the outpatient sector. Is the ENT medicine at the beginning of a structural change? HNO 2004; 52: 387-393
3. Al-Homoud S, Purkayastha S, Aziz O et al. Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models. Surg Oncol 2004; 13: 83-92
4. Arnold M, Klauber J, Schellschmidt H (Hrsg). Krankenhausreport 2002. Schwerpunkt: Krankenhaus im Wettbewerb. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2003
5. Bauer M, Hanss R, Schleppers A et al. Procedure optimization in hospital management. Anaesthesist 2004; 53: 414-426
6. Bosch F, Wehrman U, Saeger HD et al. Laparoscopic or open conventional cholecystectomy: clinical and economic considerations. Eur J Surg 2002; 168: 270-277
7. Braun JP, Schwilk B, Kuntz L et al. Analysis of personnel costs after reorganization of intensive care using calculated diagnosis-related groups comparative data: An investigation at the Charite Berlin. Anaesthesist 2007; 56: 252-258
8. Bromage SJ, Cunliffe WJ. Validation of the CR-POSSUM risk-adjusted scoring system for major colorectal cancer surgery in a single center. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 192-196
9. Brunelli A, Fianchini A, Xiume Fetal. Evaluation of the POSSUM scoring system in lung surgery. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 46: 141-146
10. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-017. Berverly Hills, London: Sage Publications; 1979: 17, 11
11. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 355-360
12. de Cassia Braga Ribeiro K, Kowalski LP. APACHE II, POSSUM, and ASA scores and the risk of perioperative complications in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129: 739-745
13. Frick U, Binder H, Barta W et al. Fair hospital comparisons - does the method contracted in Germany enable unbiased results? Gesundheitswesen 2003; 65: 8-18
14. Hansis ML. Quality assurance in ambulatory surgery. Chirurg 2004; 75: 120-125
15. Henne-Bruns D, Düring M, Kremer B (Hrsg). Chirurgie. 2., korr. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2003
16. Jones HJS, de Cossart L Risk scoring surgical patients. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 149-157
17. Kelley JE, Burrus RG, Burns RP et al. Safety, efficacy, cost, and morbidity of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 228 consecutive patients. Am Surg 1993; 59: 23-27
18. Klotz T, Nayal W, Friedrich N et al. Score-Systeme zur Qualitätskontrolle operativer Leistungen. Gesundh Ökon Qual Manag 1999; 4: 9-73
19. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA. The Apache III prognostic system risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100: 1619-1636
20. Lungen M, Stock S, Krauth C et al. Leistungen und Kosten der Hochschulambulanzen in Forschung, Lehre und Versorgung Ergebnisse der Hochschulambulanzenstudie. Dtsch med Wochenschr 2004; 129: 2399-2404
21. Lungen M, Lauterbach KW. Health policy guidelines for ambulatory and brief inpatient surgery. Backgrounds, facts and possible future solutions. Chirurg 2004; 75: 113-119
22. Lutz H. Präoperative Risikoabschätzung nach objektiven Kriterien. Anästh Intensivth Notfallmed 1976; 15: 287-292
23. March S, Swart E, Robra B. Patient satisfaction with outpatient/short stay operations in a practice clinic. Gesundheitswesen 2006; 68: 376-382
24. Maxwell SE, Delaney HD (Hrsg). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Belmont, USA, Wedsworth publishing Co. 1990
25. Meßmer K, Jähne J, Neuhaus P. Was gibt es Neues in der Chirurgie? Jahresband 2006. Landsberg, Ecomed 2006
26. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B et al. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1217-1220
27. Raetzell M, Reissmann H, Steinfath M et al. Implementation of an internal transfer pricing system for anaesthesia services. Anaesthesist 2004; 53: 1219-1230
28. Sagar PM, Hartley MH. Comparative audit of colorectal resection with POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1492-1494
29. Schmidt CE, Möller J, Hesslau U et al. Universitä tskliniken im Spannungsfeld des Krankenhausmarktes. Anästhesist 2005; 54: 694-702
30. Schmidt CE, Möller J, Reibe F et al. Patientenzufriedenheit in der stationären Versorgung. Bedeutung, Methoden und Besonderheiten. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2003; 128: 619-624
31. Schönermark MP. Zur zukünftigen Perspektive der Universitätskliniken. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2004; 129: 1524-1535
32. Schrappe M. The hospital perspective: disease management and integrated health care. Z Ärztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2003; 97: 195-200
33. Schuster M, Kuntz L, Hermening D et al. The use of diagnosis-related-groups data for external benchmarking of anesthesia and intensive care services. Anaesthesist 2006; 55: 26-32
34. Tambyraja AL, Kumar S, Nixon SJ. POSSUM scoring for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. ANZ J Surg 2005; 75: 550-552
35. Waydhas DT, Nast-Kolb D, Ruchholtz S et al. Praktische und theoretische Grenzen von Scoresystemen. Unfallchirurg 1994; 97: 185-190
36. Whiteley MS, Pryterch DR, Higgins B et al. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 812-815
37. Wolters U, Mannheim S, Wassmer G et al. What is the value of available risk-scores in predicting postoperative complications after aorto-iliac surgery? A prospective non randomized study. J Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 47: 177-185