Receptive field characterization by spike-triggered independent component analysis

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 13, 2008, Pages

  Saleem, Aman B ^a   Krapp, Holger G ^a   Schultz, Simon R ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EMD; Fly vision; H1; ICA; Lobula plate tangential cell; Reverse correlation; STC; System identification

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FLY; INTERNEURON; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIPTERA; FEMALE; INTERNEURONS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 53849141830     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.13.2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 2, 284-299.
2. Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind source deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7, 1129-1159.
3. Bialek, W., & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R. (2005). Features and dimensions: Motion estimation in fly vision.
4. Borst, A., & Egelhaaf, M. (1993). Detecting visual motion: Theory and models. Reviews of Oculomotor Research, 5, 3-27.
5. Brenner, N., Bialek, W., & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. (2000). Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron, 26, 695-702.
6. Buchner, E. (1984). Behavioural analysis of spatial vision in insects. In M. A. Ali (Ed.), Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. New York: Plenum.
7. Chichilnisky, E. J. (2001). A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network, 12, 199-213.
8. Citron, M. C., Emerson, R. C., & Levick, W. R. (1988). Nonlinear measurement and classification of receptive fields in cat retinal ganglion cells. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 16, 65-77.
9. de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., & Bialek, W. (1988). Real-time performance of movement sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: Coding and information transfer in short spike sequences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 234, 379-414.
10. Egelhaaf, M., Borst, A., & Reichardt, W. (1989). Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 6, 1070-1087.
11. Franceschini, N. (1975). Sampling of visual environment by the compound eye if the fly: Fundamentals and applications. In A. W. Snyder & R. Menzel (Eds.), Photoreceptor optics (pp. 98-125). New York: Springer.
12. Hausen, K. (1984). The lobula-plate complex of the fly: Structure, function and significance in visual behaviour. In M. A. Ali (Ed.), Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum.
13. Heeger, D. J., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A. (1996). Computational models of cortical visual processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 623-627.
14. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 160, 106-154.
15. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1998). Early exploration of the visual cortex. Neuron, 20, 401-412.
16. Hyvarinen, A. (1997). A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Computation, 9, 1483-1492.
17. Hyvarinen, A. (1999). Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10, 626-634.
18. Hyvärinen, A., & Oja, E. (2000). Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications. Neural Networks, 13, 411-430.
19. Karmeier, K., Tabor, R., Egelhaaf, M., & Krapp, H. G. (2001). Early visual experience and the receptive-field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly motion pathway. Visual Neuroscience, 18, 1-8.
20. Krapp, H. G., & Hengstenberg, R. (1997). A fast stimulus procedure to determine local receptive field properties of motion-sensitive visual interneurons. Vision Research, 37, 225-234.
21. Krapp, H. G., Hengstenberg, R., & Egelhaaf, M. (2001). Binocular contributions to optic flow processing in the fly visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 724-734.
22. Lee, J. A., Vrins, F., & Verleysen, M. (2006). Non-orthogonal support-width ICA. ESANN 2006, European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges Belgium.
23. Marmarelis, P. Z., & Marmarelis, V. Z. (1978). Analysis of physiological systems: The white-noise approach. New York: Plenum.
24. Paninski, L. (2003). Convergence properties of three spike-triggered analysis techniques. Network, 14, 437-464.
25. Papoulis, A., & Pillai, S. U. (2002). Probability, random variables and stochastic processes (4th ed.). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
26. Reichardt, W. (1957). Autokorrelations-Auswertung als funktionsprinzip des zentralnervensystems (bei der optischen wahrnehmung eines insektes). Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 12b, 448.
27. Reichardt, W. (1987). Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 161, 533-547.
28. Ringach, D. L. (2004). Mapping receptive fields in primary visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 558, 717-728.
29. Rust, N. C., Mante, V., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A. (2006). How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1421-1431.
30. Rust, N. C., Schwartz, O., Movshon, J. A., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Spike-triggered characterization of excitatory and suppressive stimulus dimensions in monkey V1. Neurocomputing, 58, 793-799.
31. Rust, N. C., Schwartz, O., Movshon, J. A., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2005). Spatiotemporal elements of macaque V1 receptive fields. Neuron, 46, 945-956.
32. Schuling, F. H., Mastebrock, H. A. K., Bult, R., & Lenting, B. P. M. (1989). Properties of elementary movement detectors in the fly calliphora erythrocephala. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 165, 179-192.
33. Schwartz, O., Pillow, J. W., Rust, N. C., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2006). Spike-triggered neural characterization. Journal of Vision, 6(4):13, 484-507, http://journalofvision.org/6/4/13/, doi:10.1167/ 6.4.13.
34. Simoncelli, E. P., & Olshausen, B. A. (2001). Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 1193-1216.
35. Simoncelli, E. P., Paninski, L., Pillow, J., & Schwartz, O. (2004). Characterization of neural responses with stochastic stimuli. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Theunissen, F. E., Sen, K., & Doupe, A. J. (2000). Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2315-2331.
37. Touryan, J., Felson, G., & Dan, Y. (2005). Spatial structure of complex cell receptive fields measured with natural images. Neuron, 45, 781-791.
38. van Hateren, J. H., & van der Schaaf, A. (1998). Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265, 359-366.
39. Warzecha, A., & Egelhaaf, M. (2000). Response latency of a motion-sensitive neuron in the fly visual system: Dependence on stimulus parameters and physiological conditions. Vision Research, 40, 2973-2983.
40. Warzecha, A., Horstmann, W., & Egelhaaf, M. (1999). Temperature-dependence of neuronal performance in the motion pathway of the blowfly calliphora erythrocephala. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202, 3161-3170.
41. Wellman, M. P., & Henrion, M. (1993). Explaining "explaining away." IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15, 287-292.
42. Wu, M. C., David, S. V., & Gallant, J. L. (2006). Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 477-505.
43. Yeredor, A. (2002). Non-orthogonal joint diagonalization in the least-squares sense with application in blind source separation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50, 1545-1553.