Mapping receptive fields in primary visual cortex

Journal of Physiology

Volumn 558, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 717-728

  Ringach, Dario L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MAPPING; CELL FUNCTION; CELL TYPE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; LINEAR SYSTEM; NERVE CELL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; SPATIAL SUMMATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STRIATE CORTEX; TEMPORAL SUMMATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; NERVE NET; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 4444298935     PISSN: 00223751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.065771     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Abbott LF & Chance FS (2002). Rethinking the taxonomy of visual neurons. Nat Neurosci 5, 391-392.
2. Adelson EH & Bergen JR (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2, 284-299.
3. Albrecht DG & Geisler WS (1991). Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 7, 825-837.
4. Albrecht DG, Geisler WS & Crane AM (2003). Nonlinear properties of visual cortex neurons: Temporal dynamics, stimulus selectivity, neural performance. In The Visual Neurosciences, ed. Chalupa L & Werner J, pp. 825-837. MIT Press, Boston.
5. Anzai A, Ohzawa I & Freeman RD (1999). Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells. J Neurophysiol 82, 891-908.
6. Baker CL Jr (2001). Linear filtering and nonlinear interactions in direction-selective visual cortex neurons: a noise correlation analysis. Vis Neurosci 18, 465-485.
7. Barlow HB (1953). Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J Physiol 119, 69-88.
8. Bell AJ & Sejnowski TJ (1997). The 'independent components' of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Res 37, 3327-3338.
9. Benardete EA & Kaplan E (1999). The dynamics of primate M retinal ganglion cells. Vis Neurosci 16, 355-368.
10. Benardete EA, Kaplan E & Knight BW (1992). Contrast gain control in the primate retina: P cells are not X-like, some M cells are. Vis Neurosci 8, 483-486.
11. Bonds AB (1989). Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 2, 41-55.
12. Bonds AB (1991). Temporal dynamics of contrast gain in single cells of cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 6, 239-255.
13. Carandini M & Heeger DJ (1994). Summation and division by neurons in primate visual cortex. Science 264, 1333-1336.
14. Carandini M, Heeger DJ & Movshon JA (1997). Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 17, 8621-8644.
15. Carandini M, Heeger DJ & Senn W (2002). A synaptic explanation of suppression in visual cortex. J Neurosci 22, 10053-10065.
16. Cavanaugh JR, Bair W & Movshon JA (2002). Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque VI neurons. J Neurophysiol 88, 2530-2546.
17. Chance FS, Nelson SB & Abbott LF (1999). Complex cells as cortically amplified simple cells. Nat Neurosci 2, 277-282.
18. Chechik G, Globerson A, Tishby N & Weiss Y (2004). Information bottleneck for Gaussian variables. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16, ed. Thrun S, Lawrence S, Schö lhopf B, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Chichilnisky EJ (2001). A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network 12, 199-213.
20. Conway BR & Livingstone MS (2003). Space-time maps and two-bar interactions of different classes of direction-selective cells in macaque V-1. J Neurophysiol 89, 2726-2742.
21. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I & Freeman RD (1993a). Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. J Neurophysiol 69, 1118-1135.
22. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I & Freeman RD (1993b). Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. J Neurophysiol 69, 1091-1117.
23. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I & Freeman RD (1995). Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways. Trends Neurosci 18, 451-458.
24. DeAngelis GC, Robson JG, Ohzawa I & Freeman RD (1992). Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 68, 144-163.
25. de Ruyter van Steveninck R & Bialek W (1988). Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 234, 379-414.
26. De Valois KK, De Valois RL & Yund EW (1979). Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. J Physiol 291, 483-505.
27. Emerson RC, Bergen JR & Adelson EH (1992). Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex. Vision Res 32, 203-218.
28. Enroth-Cugell C & Robson JG (1966). The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol 187, 517-552.
29. Everson R & Roberts S (2000). Inferring the eigenvalues of covariance matrices from limited, noisy data. IEEE Trans Signal Proc 48, 2083.
30. Geisler WS & Albrecht DG (1991). Cortical neurons: isolation of contrast gain control. Vision Res 32, 1409-1410.
31. Hartline HK & Ratliff F (1957). Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus. J General Physiol 40, 357-376.
32. Hartline HK & Ratliff F (1958). Spatial summation of inhibitory influences in the eye of Limulus, and the mutual interaction of receptor units. J General Physiol 41, 1049-1066.
33. Hartline HK, Wagner HG & Ratliff F (1956). Inhibition in the eye of Limulus. J General Physiol 39, 651-673.
34. van Hateren JH & Ruderman DL (1998). Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 265, 2315-2320.
35. Heeger DJ (1992). Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 9, 181-197.92.
36. Hirsch JA (2003). Synaptic physiology and receptive field structure in the early visual pathway of the cat. Cereb Cortex 13, 1363-1369.
37. Hochstein S & Shapley RM (1976a). Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 262, 265-284.
38. Hochstein S & Shapley RM (1976b). Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell classifications. J Physiol 262, 237-264.
39. Hoyer PO & Hyvarinen A (2002). A multi-layer sparse coding network learns contour coding from natural images. Vision Res 42, 1593-1605.
40. Hubel DH & Wiesel TN (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160, 106-154.
41. Hubel DH & Wiesel TN (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol 195, 215-243.
42. Hubel DH & Wiesel TN (1977). Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 198, 1-59.
43. Hubel DH & Wiesel TN (1998). Early exploration of the visual cortex. Neuron 20, 401-412.
44. Hunter IW & Korenberg MJ (1986). The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and Hammerstein cascade models. Biol Cybern 55, 135-144.
45. Hurri J & Hyvarinen A (2003). Simple-cell-like receptive fields maximize temporal coherence in natural video. Neural Comput 15, 663-691.
46. Hyvarinen A & Hoyer PO (2001). A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images. Vision Res 41, 2413-2423.
47. Jacob MS, Peterson MR, Wu A & Freeman RD (2003). Laminar differences in response characteristics of cells in the primary visual cortex. Program No. 910.13. 2003 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2003. Online.
48. Jagadeesh B, Wheat HS & Ferster D (1993). Linearity of summation of synaptic potentials underlying direction selectivity in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. Science 262, 1901-1904.
49. Jones JP & Palmer LA (1987a). An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58, 1233-1258.
50. Jones JP & Palmer LA (1987b). The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58, 1187-1211.
51. Kagan I, Gur M & Snodderly DM (2003). Spatial organization of receptive fields in VI neurons of alert monkeys: comparison with responses with gratings. J Neurophysiol 88, 2557-2574.
52. Kapadia MK, Westheimer G & Gilbert CD (1999). Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 12073-12078.
53. Kaplan E. Purpura K & Shapley RM (1987). Contrast affects the transmission of visual information through the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus. J Physiol 391, 267-288.
54. Kuffler SW (1953). Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J Neurophysiol 16, 37-68.
55. Kulikowski JJ & Bishop PO (1981). Fourier analysis and spatial representation in the visual cortex. Experientia 37, 160-163.
56. Lau B, Stanley GB & Dan Y (2002). Computational subunits of visual cortical neurons revealed by artificial neural networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 8974-8979.
57. Maffei L & Fiorentini A (1973). The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. Vision Res 13, 1255-1267.
58. Marmarelis PZ & Marmalelis VZ (1978). Analysis of Physiological systems: The White-Noise Approach. Plenum Press, New York.
59. Martinez LM & Alonso JM (2003). Complex receptive fields in primary visual cortex. Neuroscientist 9, 317-331.
60. Mechler F & Ringach DL (2002). On the classification of simple and complex cells. Vision Res 42, 1017-1033.
61. Morrone MC, Burr DC & Maffei L (1982). Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. J. Neurophysiological evidence. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 216, 335-354.
62. Morrone MC, Burr DC & Speed HD (1987). Cross-orientation inhibition in cat is GABA mediated. Exp Brain Res 67, 635-644.
63. Movshon JA, Thompson ID & Tolhurst DJ (1978). Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol 283, 53-77.
64. Nykamp DQ & Ringach DL (2002). Full identification of a linear-nonlinear system via cross-correlation analysis. J Vis 2, 1-11.
65. Olshausen BA (2001). Sparse codes and spikes. In Probabilistic Models of Perception and Brain Function. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
66. Olshausen BA & Field DJ (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381, 607-609.
67. Polat U, Mizobe K, Pettet MW, Kasamatsu T & Norcia AM (1998). Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature 391, 580-584.
68. Purpura K, Kaplan E & Shapley RM (1988). Background light and the contrast gain of primate P and M retinal ganglion cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Jun 85, 4534-4537.
69. Rao RP & Ballard DH (1997). Dynamic model of visual recognition predicts neural response properties in the visual cortex. Neural Comput 9, 721-763.
70. Rao RP & Ballard DH (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat Neurosci 2, 79-87.
71. Reid RC, Soodak RE & Shapley RM (1987). Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84, 8740-8744.
72. Reid RC, Soodak RE & Shapley RM (1991). Directional selectivity and spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 66, 505-529.
73. Ringach DL (2002). Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 88, 455-463.
74. Ringach DL, Bredfeldt CE, Shapley RM & Hawken MJ (2002). Suppression of neural responses to nonoptimal stimuli correlates with tuning selectivity in macaque VI. J Neurophysiol 87, 1018-1027.
75. Ringach DL, Hawken MJ & Shapley R (1997). Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex. Nature 387, 281-284.
76. Ringach DL, Hawken MJ & Shapley R (2003). Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque VI: the role of global and tuned suppression. J Neurophysiol 90, 342-352.
77. Ringach DL, Shapley RM & Hawken MJ (2002b). Orientation selectivity in macaque v1: diversity and laminar dependence. J Neurosci 22, 5639-5651.
78. Robson JG (1991). Neural coding of contrast in the visual system. Opt Soc Am Techn Digest System 17, 152.
79. Rodieck RW & Stone J (1965a). Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 28, 832-849.
80. Rodieck RW & Stone J (1965b). Response of cat retinal ganglion cells to moving visual patterns. J Neurophysiol 28, 819-832.
81. Rust NC, Schwartz O, Movshon JA & Simoncelli EP (2004). Spike-triggered characterization of excitatory and suppressive stimulus dimensions in monkey V1. Neurocomputing 58-60, 793-799.
82. Sceniak MP, Ringach DL, Hawken MJ & Shapley R (1999). Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons. Nat Neurosci 2, 733-739.
83. Schwartz O & Simoncelli EP (2001). Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nat Neurosci 4, 819-825.
84. Sengpiel F, Baddeley RJ, Freeman TC, Harrad R & Blakemore C (1998). Different mechanisms underlie three inhibitory phenomena in cat area 17. Vision Res 38, 2067-2080.
85. Shapley R, Enroth-Cugell C, Bonds AB & Kirby A (1972). Gain control in the retina and retinal dynamics. Nature 236, 352-353.
86. Shapley R, Hawken M & Ringach DL (2003). Dynamics of orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex and the importance of cortical inhibition. Neuron 38, 689-699.
87. Shapley RM & Victor JD (1978). The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol Dec 285, 275-298.
88. Shapley R & Victor JD (1979). The contrast gain control of the cat retina. Vision Res 19, 431-434.
89. Sharpee T, Rust NC & Bialek W (2004). Analyzing neural resposnes to natural signals: Maximally informative dimensions. Neural Computation 16, 223-250.
90. Simoncelli EP & Olshausen BA (2001). Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24, 1193-1216.
91. Simoncelli EP, Pillow J, Paninski L & Schwartz O (2004). Characterization of neural responses with stochastic stimuli. In The Cognitive Neurosciences, ed. Gazzaniga M, (in press).
92. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG & Bonds AB (1991). Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res 31, 1079-1086.
93. Spitzer H & Hochstein S (1985). A complex-cell receptive-field model. J Neurophysiol 53, 1266-1286.
94. Spitzer H & Hochstein S (1988). Complex-cell receptive field models. Prog Neurobiol 31, 285-309.
95. Sutter E (1975). A revised conception of visual receptive fields based on pseudorandom spatio-temporal pattern stimuli. Proceedings of the Conference on Testing and Identification of Nonlinear Systems. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
96. Tishby N, Pereira FC & Bialek W (1999). The information bottleneck Method. Proceedings of the of the 37th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, http://www.csl.uiuc.edu/allerton/index.html.
97. Tolhurst DJ & Heeger DJ (1997). Comparison of contrast-normalization and threshold models of the responses of simple cells in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 14, 293-309.
98. Touryan J, Lau B & Dan Y (2002). Isolation of relevant visual features from random stimuli for cortical complex cells. J Neurosci 22, 10811-10818.