Designing requirements engineering research

2007 5th International Workshops on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering, CERE

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 37-48

  Wieringa, Roel ^a   Heerkens, Hans ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ENGINEERING SCIENCE;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 53849133115     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CERE.2007.4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. H. Aitken. Science, technology and economics: The invention of radio as a case study. In W. Krohn, E. Layton, and P. Weingart, editors, The Dynamics of Science and Technology. Sociology of the Sciences, II, pages 89-111. Reidel, 1978.
2. L. Apostel. Towards a formal study of models in the non-formal sciences. In H. Freudenthal, editor, The Concept and Role of the Model in the Mathematical and the Natural and Social Sciences, pages 1-37. Reidel, 1961.
3. R. Baskerville. Distinguishing action research from participative case studies. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 1(1):25-45, March 1997.
4. J. Bennett. The mechanicss philosophy and the mechanical philosophy. History of Science, 24, March 1986.
5. Böhme, V. D. Daele, and W. Krohn. The 'scientifi cation' of technology. In W. Krohn, E. Layton, and P. Weingart, editors, The Dynamics of Science and Technology. Sociology of the Sciences, II, pages 219-250. Reidel, 1978.
6. M. Bunge. Technology as applied science. In F. Rapp, editor, Contributions to the Philosophy of Technology, pages 19-39. Reidel, 1974.
7. J. Calvert. What's so special about basic research? Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(2): 199-220, March 2006.
8. W. Carlson. Innovation and the modern corporation. From heroic invention to industrial science. In J. Krige and D. Pestre, editors, Companion to Science in the Twentieth Century, pages 203-226. Routledge, 2003.
9. E. Constant. The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution. Johns Hopkins, 1980.
10. A. Dardenne, A. v. Lamsweerde, and S. Fickas. Goaldirected requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming, 20(1-2): 3-50, 1993.
11. A. Davis and A. Hickey. Requirements researchers: Do we practice what we preach? Requirements Engineering, 7(2): 107-111, June 2002.
12. A. Davis and A. Hickey. A new paradigm for planning and evaluating requirements engineering research. In 2nd International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineeering, pages 7-16, 2004.
13. D. DeSolla Price. Of sealing wax and string. Natural History, 84(1):49-56, 1984.
14. A. Elzinga. The new production of reductionism in models relating to research policy. In K. Grandin, N. Wormbs, and S. Widmalm, editors, The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications, pages 277-304. Science History Publications, 2004.
15. R. Feynman. Surely You're Joking Mr. Feynman! Vintage, 1992.
16. J. Finch. Engineering and science: A historical review and appraisal. Technology and Culture, 2:318-332, 1961.
17. M. Gibbons and C. Johnson. Science, technology and the development of the transistor. In B. Barnes and D. Edge, editors, Science in Context. Readings in the Sociology of Science, pages 177-185. Open University Press, 1982.
18. R. Glass. Pilot studies: What, why, and how. Journal of Systems and Software, 36:85-97, 1997.
19. B. Godin. The linear model of innovation: The historical reconstruction of an analytic framework. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(6):639-667, November 2006.
20. C. Gunter, E. Gunter, M. Jackson, and P. Zave. A reference model for requirements and specifi cations. IEEE Software, 17(3):37-43, May/June 2000.
21. J. Henry. Animism and empiricism: Copernican physics and the origin of William Gilbert's experimental method. Journal of the History of Ideas, 62:99-119, 2001.
22. J. Henry. The scientifi c revolution and the origins of modern science. Palgrave, 2002. Second edition.
23. M. Jackson. Problem Frames: Analysing and Structuring Software Development Problems. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
24. F. Jevons. The interaction of science and technology today, or, is science the mother of invention? Technology and Culture, 17:729-742, October 1976.
25. A. Keller. Has science created technology? Minerva, 22(2):160-182, June 1984.
26. A. Keller. Mathematics, mechanics and the origins of the culture of mechanical invention. Minerva, 23(3):348-361, September 1985.
27. B. Kitchenham. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Technical Report TR/SE-0401/0400011T.1, Keele University/National ICT Australia, 2004.
28. B. Kitchenham, S. Pfbeger, D. Hoaglin, K. Emam, and J. Rosenberg. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(8):721-733, August 2002.
29. B. Kitchenham, L. Pickard, and S. Pfeeger. Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software, 12(4):52-62, July 1995.
30. S. Kline. Innovation is not a linear process. Research Management, pages 36-45, July/August 1985.
31. T. Kuhn. Mathematical versus experimental traditions in the development of physical science. In T. Kuhn, editor, The Essential Tension, pages 31-65. University of Chicago Press, 1977. Reprinted from The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 7(1976), pages 1-31.
32. G. Küppers. On the relation between technology and science-goals of knowledge and dynamics of theories. The example of combustion technology, thermodynamics and And dynamics. In W. Krohn, E. Layton, and P. Weingart, editors, The Dynamics of Science and Technology. Sociology of the Sciences, II, pages 113-133. Reidel, 1978.
33. F. Lau. A review on the use of action research in information systems studies. In A. Lee, J. Liebenau, and J. DeGross, editors, Information Systems and Qualitative Research, pages 31-68. Chapman & Hall, 1997.
34. R. Laudan. Cognitive change in technology and science. In R. Laudan, editor, The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientifi c Change Relevant?, pages 83-104. Reidel, 1984.
35. E. Layton. Mirror-image twins: The communities of science and technology in 19th century America. Technology and Culture, 12:562-580, October 1971.
36. E. Layton. American ideologies of science and engineering. Technology and Culture, 17:688-701, 1976.
37. E. Layton. Millwrights and engineers, science, social roles and the evolution of the turbine in america. In W. Krohn, E. Layton, and P. Weingart, editors, The Dynamics of Science and Technology. Sociology of the Sciences, II, pages 61-87. Reidel, 1978.
38. P. Long. Power, patronage, and the authorship of Ars. Isis, 88:1-84, 1997.
39. J. McKelvey. Science and technology: The driven and the driver. Technology Review, pages 38-47, January 1985.
40. N. McKendrick. The role of science in the industrial revolution: A study of Josiah Wedgwood as a scientist and industrial chemist. In M. Teich and R. Young, editors, Changing Perspectives in the History of Science, pages 274-319. Heinemann, 1973.
41. Merriam-Webster Inc. Webster's ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, 1988.
42. N. Roozenburg and J. Eekels. Product design: Fundamentals and Methods. Wiley, 1995.
43. S. Slaughter and G. Rhoades. The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(3):303-339, Summer 1996.
44. C. Smith. The interaction of science and technology in the history of metallurgy. Technology and Culture, 2:357-367, 1961.
45. G. Susman. An assessment of the scientifi c merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4):582-603, December 1978.
46. W. Vincenti. What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Johns Hopkins, 1990.
47. R. Wieringa. Requirements Engineering: Frameworks for Understanding. Wiley, 1996. Also available at http://www.es.utwente/nl/ ~roelw/REFU/all.pdf.
48. R. Wieringa and J. Heerkens. The methodological soundness of requirements engineering papers: A conceptual framework and two case studies. Requirements Engineering Journal, 11(4):295-307, 2006.
49. R. Wieringa, N. Maiden, N. Mead, and C. Rolland. Requirements engineering paper classifi cation and evaluation criteria: A proposal and a discussion. Requirements Engineering Journal, 11:102-107, 2006.
50. G. Wise. Science and technology. Osiris (2nd Series), 1:229-246, 1985.
51. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and A. Weslén. Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer, 2002.
52. R. Yin, Case Study research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, 2003. Third Edition.
53. M. Zelkowitz and D. Wallace. Experimental models for validating technology. Computer, 31(5):23-31, 1998.
54. M. Zelkowitz, D. Wallace, and D. Binkley. Culture conficts in software engineering technology transfer. In 23rd NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Software Engineering Workshop, December 2-3 1998.