The relationship between changes in self-rated quality of life after cochlear implantation and changes in individual complaints

Clinical Otolaryngology

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 427-434

  Zhao, F ^a   Bai, Z ^b,d   Stephens, D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Kun Ming Medical College   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ISOLATION; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COMMUNICATION; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL ISOLATION; TELEPHONE;

EID: 53849089588     PISSN: 17494478     EISSN: 17494486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01773.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Tye-Murray N., Tyler R.S., Woodworth G.G. et al. (1992) Performance over time with a nucleus or ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 13, 200 209
2. Hinderink J., Mens L.H.M., Bronx J.P.L. et al. (1995) Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multi-channel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 105, 619 622
3. Parkinson A.J., Parkinson W.S., Tyler R.S. et al. (1998) Speech perception performance in experienced cochlear-implant patients receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant. J. Speech Lang. Hear Res. 41, 1073 1087
4. Labadie R.F., Carrasco V.N., Gilmer C.H. et al. (2000) Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 123, 419 423
5. Djalilian H.R., King T.A., Smith S.L. et al. (2002) Cochlear implantation in the elderly: results and quality-of-life assessment. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 111, 890 895
6. Dorman M.F., Basham K., McCandless G. et al. (1991) Speech understanding and music appreciation with the Ineriad cochlear implant. Hearing J. 44, 34 35
7. Bai Z. Stephens S.D.G. (2005) Subjective outcome measures after cochlear implantation: overall measures. Audiological Med. 3, 212 219
8. Stephens S.D.G. Hétu R. (1992) Impairment, disability and handicap in audiology: toward a consensus. Audiology 30, 185 200
9. WHO QOL Group. (1993) Measuring Quality of Life: The Development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHO QOL). WHO, Geneva
10. Mo B., Lindbaek M. Harris S. (2005) Cochlear implants and quality of life: a prospective study. Ear Hear. 26, 186 194
11. Abrams H.B., Chisolm T.H. McArdle R. (2005) Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: a tutorial. Trends Amplif. 9, 99 109
12. Damen G.W., Beynon A.J., Krabbe P.F. et al. (2007) Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: long-term follow-up. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 136, 597 604
13. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. (2004) Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness. Ear Hear. 25, 310 335
14. Hinderink J.B., Krabbe P.F. Van Den Broek P. (2000) Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 123, 756 765
15. Barcham L.J. Stephens S.D.G. (1980) The use of an open-ended problems questionnaire in auditory rehabilitation. Br. J. Audiol. 14, 49 54
16. Habib R.G. Hinchcliffe R. (1978) Subjective magnitude of auditory impairment. Audiology 17, 68 76
17. Hallberg L.R.M.A., Ringdahl A. Holmes C.C. (2005) Psychological general well-being (quality of life) in patients with cochlear implants: importance of social environment and age. Int. J. Audiol. 44, 706 711
18. Zhao F., Stephens S.D.G., Sim S.W. et al. (1997) The use of qualitative questionnaires in cochlear implant candidates. Clin. Otolaryngol. 22, 254 259
19. Tyler R.S. (1994) Advantages and disadvantages expected and reported by cochlear implant patients. Am. J. Otol. 15, 523 531
20. Zhao F. Stephens S.D.G. (1996) Hearing complaints of patients with King-Kopetzky Syndrome. Br. J. Audiol. 30, 397 402
21. Lormore K.A. Stephens S.D.G. (1994) Use of the open-ended questionnaire with patients and their significant others. Br. J. Audiol. 28, 81 89
22. Maillet C.J., Tyler R.S. Jordan H.N. (1995) Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 165, 31 48
23. Cox R., ed 2000) Proceedings of the workshop 'Self-reported outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation including hearing aids'. Ear Hear. 21, S1 S115
24. Knutson J.F., Murray K.T., Husarek S. et al. (1998) Psychological change over 54 months of cochlear implant use. Ear Hear. 19, 191 201
25. Tyler R.S., Parkinson A.J., Woodworth G.G. et al. (2007) Performance over time of adult patients using Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 508 522