Bladder cancer detection with CT urography in an academic medical center 1

Radiology

Volumn 249, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 195-202

  Sadow, Cheryl A ^a,b   Silverman, Stuart G ^a   O'Leary, Michael P ^a   Signorovitch, James E ^a  

^a Bigham and Woman's Hospital   (United States)

^b SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; FUROSEMIDE; IOPROMIDE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; BLADDER INJURY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC UROGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UROGENITAL TRACT CANCER; UROGRAPHY; UTERUS BIOPSY; ADOLESCENT; BLADDER TUMOR; FOLLOW UP; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CYSTOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMATURIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 53749091821     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2491071860     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2006. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society, 2005; 4. 2. Soloway MS, Sofer M, Vaidya A. Contemporary management of stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 2002; 167:1573-1583.
2. Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS, et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy. II. Patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology 2001;57:604-610.
3. Curry NS, Schabel SI, Betsill WL. Small renal neoplasms: diagnostic imaging, pathologic features, and clinical course. Radiology 1986;158:113-117.
4. Levine E, Huntrakoon M, Wetzel LH. Small renal neoplasms: clinical, pathologic, and imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153:69-73.
5. Curry NS. Small renal masses (lesions smaller than 3 cm): imaging evaluation and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:355-362.
6. Silverman SG, Lee BY, Seltzer SE, Bloom DA, Corless CL, Adams DF. Small (≤ or = 3 cm) renal masses: correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:597-605.
7. Cohan RH, Sherman LS, Korobkin M, Bass JC, Francis IR. Renal masses: assessment of corticomedullary-phase and nephrographic-phase CT scans. Radiology 1995;196:445-451.
8. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 1995;194:789-794.
9. Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:97-101.
10. McNicholas MM, Raptopoulos VD, Schwartz RK, et al. Excretory phase CT urography for opacification of the urinary collecting system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1261-1267.
11. Joffe SA, Servaes S, Okon S, Horowitz M. Multi-detector row CT urography in the evaluation of hematuria. RadioGraphics 2003;23:1441-1455.
12. Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Inampudi P, et al. MDCT urography of upper tract urothelial neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1873-1881.
13. Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology 2002;222:353-360.
14. Pepe MS. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003; 48-59.
15. Silverman SG, Akbar SA, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Bhagwat JG, Seifter JL. Multi-detector row CT urography of normal urinary collecting system: furosemide versus saline as adjunct to contrast medium. Radiology 2006;240:749-755.
16. Chow LC, Sommer FG. Multidetector CT urography with abdominal compression and three-dimensional reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:849-855.
17. Messing EM. Urothelial tumors of the urinary tract. In: Walsh PC, ed. Campbell's urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2002; 2732-2871.
18. Newhouse JH, Amis ES Jr, Bigongiari LR, et al. Radiologic investigation of patients with hematuria: American College of Radiology-ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000;215(suppl):687-691.
19. Corrigan NT, Crooks J, Shand J. Are dedicated bladder films necessary as part of intravenous urography for hematuria? BJU Int 2000;85:806-810.
20. Datta SN, Allen GM, Evans R, Vaughton KC, Lucas MG. Urinary tract ultrasonography in the evaluation of haematuria: a report of over1,000cases. AnnRCollSurgEngl2002; 84:203-205.
21. O'Malley ME, Hahn PF, Yoder IC, Gazelle GS, McGovern FJ, Mueller PR. Comparison of excretory phase, helical computed tomography with intravenous urography in patients with painless haematuria. Clin Radiol 2003;58:294-300.
22. Kim JK, Park S, Ahn HJ, Kim CS, Cho KS. Bladder cancer: analysis of multi-detector row helical CT enhancement pattern and accuracy in tumor detection and perivesical staging. Radiology 2004;231:725-731.
23. Turney BW, Willatt JMG, Nixon D, Crew JP, Cowan NC. Computed tomography urography for diagnosing bladder cancer. BJU Int 2006;98:345-348.
24. Fielding JR, Hoyte L, Okon SA, et al. Tumor detection by virtual cystoscopy with color mapping of bladder wall thickness. J Urol 2002;167:559-562.