Velocity analysis based on data correlation

Geophysical Prospecting

Volumn 56, Issue 6 SPEC. ISS., 2008, Pages 791-803

  van Leeuwen, Tristan ^a   Mulder, W A ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MODAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; VELOCITY; WAVE EQUATIONS; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

CONVOLUTIONAL MODEL; DATA CORRELATIONS; DATA DOMAINS; FULL WAVES; FULL-WAVEFORM INVERSION; GRADIENT-BASED OPTIMIZATION METHODS; HIGHLY NONLINEAR; IMAGE DOMAINS; LEAST-SQUARES; MIGRATION VELOCITY ANALYSIS; NOVEL METHODS; OBSERVED DATA; SEISMIC DATA; VELOCITY ANALYSIS; VELOCITY MODELING; WAVEFORM INVERSIONS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CORRELATION; DATA INVERSION; DECONVOLUTION; INVERSE PROBLEM; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC MIGRATION; VELOCITY STRUCTURE; WAVE EQUATION; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

EID: 53549118020     PISSN: 00168025     EISSN: 13652478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00704.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brown M.P. and Guitton A. 2005. Least-squares joint imaging of multiples and primaries. Geophysics 70, S79-S89.
2. Chavent G. and Clément F. 1993. Waveform inversion through MBTT formulation. Technical Report 1893 INRIA.
3. Clément F., Chavent G. and Gómez S. 2001. Migration-based traveltime waveform inversion of 2-D simple structures: A synthetic example. Geophysics 66, 845-860.
4. Doherty S.M. and Claerbout J.F. 1974. Velocity analysis based on the wave equation. Technical Report 1, Stanford Exploration Project. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/oldreports/sep01/01_12.pdf.
5. Dussaud E.A. and Symes W.W. 2005. Velocity analysis from interferometric data. 75th SEG meeting, Houston, Texax, USA, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 2237-2241.
6. Jiang Z., Sheng J., Yu J., Schuster G.T. and Hornby B.E. 2007. Migration methods for imaging different-order multiples. Geophysical Prospecting 51, 1-19.
7. Lailly P. 1983. The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migrations. In: Conference on Inverse Scattering: Theory and Application (eds J.B. Bednar, R. Redner, E. Robinson and A. Weglein). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
8. Li J. and Symes W.W. 2007. Interval velocity estimation via NMO-based differential semblance. Geophysics 72, U75-U88.
9. Luo Y. and Schuster G.T. 1989. Wave-equation traveltime inversion. Geophysics 56, 645-653.
10. MacKay S. and Abma R. 1992. Imaging and velocity analysis with depth-focussing analysis. Geophysics 57, 1608-1622.
11. Mora P. 1988. Elastic wave-field inversion of reflection and transmission data. Geophysics 53, 750-759.
12. Mulder W.A. and ten Kroode A.P.E. 2002. Automatic velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization. Geophysics 67, 1184-1191.
13. Plessix R.-E. 2006. A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International 167, 495-503.
14. Plessix R.-E., Chavent G. and Roeck Y.-H. De 1999. Waveform inversion of reflection seismic data for kinematic parameters by local inversion. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing 20, 1033-1052.
15. Pratt R.G., Song Z.M., Williamson P. and Warner M. 1996. Two-dimensional velocity models from wide-angle seismic data by wavefield inversion. Geophysical Journal International 124, 232-340.
16. Pratt R.G. and Hicks G.J. 1998. Gauss-Newton and full-Newton methods in frequency space seismic waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International 133, 341-362.
17. Rickett J.E. and Sava P.C. 2002. Offset and angle-domain common image-point gathers for shot-profile migration. Geophysics 67, 883-889.
18. Sava P.C. and Biondi B. 2004. Wave-equation migration velocity analysis. I. Theory. Geophysical Prospecting 52, 593-606.
19. Sava P.C. and Fomel S. 2006. Time-shift imaging condition in seismic migration. Geophysics 71, S209-S217.
20. Shen P., Symes W.W. and Stolk C.C. 2003. Differential semblance velocity analysis by wave-equation migration. 73th SEG meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 2132-2135.
21. Stork C. 1992. Reflection tomography in the postmigrated domain. Geophysics 57, 680-692.
22. Symes W.W. 1999. All stationary points of differential semblance are global minimizers: Layered acoustics. Technical Report 100, Stanford Exlorayion Project.
23. Symes W.W. and Carazzone J.J. 1991. Velocity inversion by differential semblance optimization. Geophysics 56, 654-663.
24. Tarantola A. 1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics 49, 1259-1266.
25. Tarantola A. and Valette A. 1982. Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics 20, 129-232.
26. Vogel C. R. 2002. Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, vol. 23. SIAM, Philadelphia.
27. Yilmaz O. and Chambers R. 1984. Migration velocity analysis by wavefield extrapolation. Geophysics 32, 1664-1674.
28. Youn O.K. and Zhou H. 2001. Depth imaging with multiples. Geophysics 66, 246-255.