The effect of anaesthetic agents on induction, recovery and patient preferences in adult day case surgery: A 7-day follow-up randomized controlled trial

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 876-883

  Moore, J K ^a   Elliott, R A ^b   Payne, K ^b   Moore, E W ^a   St Leger, A S ^b,d   Harper, N J N ^c   Pollard, B J ^c   Kerr, J ^a,e  

^a Wirral Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d Sch of Epidemiol and Hlth Sci   (United Kingdom)

^e YEOVIL DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ambulatory (day stay); Anaesthesia, general; Inhalation anaesthesia; Intravenous anaesthesia; Patient preferences; Postoperative care recovery; Postoperative nausea and vomiting; TCI TIVA

Indexed keywords

ISOFLURANE; NITROUS OXIDE; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONCENTRATION LOSS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; EXCITATORY MOVEMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FORGETFULNESS; HICCUP; HUMAN; INJECTION PAIN; INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; NAUSEA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIDE EFFECT; TIME; VOMITING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISOFLURANE; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; MIDDLE AGED; NITROUS OXIDE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 53549103857     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021507003493     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Lerman J, Sikich N, Kleinman S, Yentis S. The pharmacology of sevoflurane in adults and children. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 814-824.
2. Fish WH, Hobbs AJ, Daniels MV. Comparison of sevoflurane and total intravenous anaesthesia for daycase urological surgery. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 999-1006.
3. Smith I, Thwaites AJ. Target-controlled propofol vs. sevoflurane: a double-blind, randomised comparison in day-case anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 745-752.
4. Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, Sakima N, Parker SD, Fleischer LA. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 632-641.
5. Myles PS, Bain DL, Johnson F, McMahon R. Is anaesthesia evidence-based? A survey of anaesthetic practice. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 591-595.
6. Elliott RA, Payne K, Moore JK et al. Which anaesthetic agents and techniques are most cost effective for day surgery? Health Technol Assess 2002; 6: 1-161.
7. Elliott RA, Payne K, Moore JK et al. Clinical and economic choices in anaesthesia for day surgery: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 412-416.
8. Protheroe J, Fahey T, Montgomery AA, Peters TJ, Smeeth L. The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis Commentary: patients, preferences, and evidence. BMJ 2000; 320: 1380-1384.
9. Pollard BJ, Elliott RA, Moore EW. Anaesthetic agents in adult day case surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 1-9.
10. Tramer M, Moore A, McQuay H. Propofol anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting: quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled studies. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 247-255.
11. Joo HS, Perks WJ. Sevoflurane versus propofol for anesthetic induction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 213-219.
12. Sneyd JR, Carr A, Byrom WD, Bilski AJT. A meta-analysis of nausea and vomiting following maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol or inhalational agents. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 433-445.