Time course of changes in ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after overnight orthokeratology

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 4314-4320

  Hiraoka, Takahiro ^a   Okamoto, Chikako ^a   Ishii, Yuko ^a   Kakita, Tetsuhiko ^b   Okamoto, Fumiki ^a   Oshika, Tetsuro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b Kakita Eye Clinic   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OCULAR HIGHER ORDER ABERRATION; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUPIL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; MYOPIA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; ORTHOKERATOLOGIC PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 53449083370     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1586     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'Leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:791-799.
2. Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2518-2523. (Pubitemid 36618409)
3. Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, Barr JT, Bullimore MA. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:252-259.
4. Mountford J. An analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. ICLC. 1997;24:128-143. (Pubitemid 127165445)
5. Rah MJ, Jackson JM, Jones LA, Marsden HJ, Bailey MD, Barr JT. Overnight orthokeratology: preliminary results of the Lenses and Overnight Orthokeratology (LOOK) study. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:598-605.
6. Cheung SW, Cho P. Subjective and objective assessments of the effect of orthokeratology: a cross-sectional study. Curr Eye Res. 2004;28:121-127. (Pubitemid 38200946)
7. Swarbrick HA. Orthokeratology review and update. Clin Exp Optom. 2006;89:124-143.
8. Hiraoka T, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, et al. Corneal higher-order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:429-436. (Pubitemid 40379068)
9. Joslin CE, Wu SM, McMahon TT, Shahidi M. Higher-order wavefront aberrations in corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:805-811. (Pubitemid 38010098)
10. Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on higher-order aberrations and best-corrected visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:490-497.
11. Hiraoka T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y, Kakita T, Oshika T. Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order aberrations following overnight orthokeratology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:550-556. (Pubitemid 351260684)
12. Kuroda T, Fujikado T, Maeda N, Oshika T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T. Wavefront analysis of higher-order aberrations in patients with cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:438-444. (Pubitemid 34208020)
13. Yamane N, Miyata K, Samejima T, et al. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3986-3990. (Pubitemid 39411151)
14. Tanabe T, Miyata K, Samejima T, et al. Influence of wavefront aberration and corneal subepithelial haze on low-contrast visual acuity after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:620-624. (Pubitemid 39420491)
15. Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP, Cottingham AJ, Yee RW. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 1998;14:397-407. (Pubitemid 28350703)
16. Ghaith AA, Daniel J, Stulting RD, Thompson KP, Lynn M. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after radial keratotomy and photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:12-18. (Pubitemid 28098889)
17. Ginsburg AP, Waring GO 3rd, Steinberg EB, et al. Contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Refract Corneal Surg. 1990;6:82-91.
18. Krasnov MM, Avetisov SE, Makashova NV, Mamikonian VR. The effect of radial keratotomy on contrast sensitivity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;15:105:651-654. (Pubitemid 18166321)
19. Bullimore MA, Olson MD, Maloney RK. Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy with a 6-mm ablation zone. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:1-7.
20. Montes-Mico R, Charman WN. Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:646-651. (Pubitemid 33098087)
21. Seiler T, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Krinke HE. Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:17-21. (Pubitemid 30036431)
22. Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from -1.25 to -6.00 diopters. J Refract Surg. 1997;13:528-534. (Pubitemid 27459551)
23. Perez-Santonja JJ, Sakla HF, Alio JL. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:183-189. (Pubitemid 28136544)
24. Mutyala S, McDonald MB, Scheinblum KA, Ostrick MD, Brint SF, Thompson H. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1864-1867. (Pubitemid 30769627)
25. Chan JW, Edwards MH, Woo GC, Woo VC. Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1774-1779.
26. Wang IJ, Sun YC, Lee YC, Hou YC, Hu FR. The relationship between anterior corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity in conventional LASIK. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31:563-568.
27. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:S596-S601. (Pubitemid 32896395)
28. Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, Howland HC, El Danasoury MA. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:1-7. (Pubitemid 29036609)
29. Hjortdal JO, Møller-Pedersen T, Ivarsen A, Ehlers N. Corneal power, thickness, and stiffness: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of PRK and LASIK for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:21-29. (Pubitemid 40260688)
30. Shimizu K, Amano S, Tanaka S. Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: one-year follow-up in 97 eyes. J Refract Corneal Surg. 1994;10:S178-S187. (Pubitemid 24168411)
31. Hersh PS, Stulting RD, Steinert RF, et al. Results of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. The Summit PRK Study Group. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1535-1553.
32. Artal P, Chen L, Fernandez EJ, Singer B, Manzanera S, Williams DR. Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations. J Vision. 2004;4:281-287. (Pubitemid 39057797)
33. Stillitano I, Schor P, Lipener C, Hofling-Lima AL. Stability of wavefront aberrations during the daytime after 6 months of overnight orthokeratology corneal reshaping. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:978-983. (Pubitemid 350175130)
34. Schanzlin DJ, Santos VR, Waring GO 3rd, et al. Diurnal change in refraction, corneal curvature, visual acuity, and intraocular pressure after radial keratotomy in the PERK Study. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:167-175.
35. McDonnell PJ, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Waring GO 3rd. Morning-to-evening change in refraction, corneal curvature, and visual acuity 11 years after radial keratotomy in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy study. The PERK Study Group. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:233-239. (Pubitemid 26066203)
36. Sakata N, Tokunaga T, Miyata K, Oshika T. Changes in contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher order aberration by conventional myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2007;51:347-352. (Pubitemid 47561678)
37. Berntsen DA, Mitchell GL, Barr JT. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:354-359.
38. Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:886-891. (Pubitemid 41566870)
39. Ritchey ER, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The comparison of overnight lens modalities (COLM) study. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31:70-75.
40. Soni PS, Nguyen TT, Bonanno JA. Overnight orthokeratology: refractive and corneal recovery after discontinuation of reverse-geometry lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:254-262.
41. O'Doherty M, O'Keeffe M, Kelleher C. Five year follow up of laser in situ keratomileusis for all levels of myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:20-23. (Pubitemid 43029889)
42. Fan-Paul NI, Li J, Miller JS, Florakis GJ. Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:533-546. (Pubitemid 36009476)
43. Montes-Mico R, Charman WN. Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:9-13. (Pubitemid 34098014)
44. Montes-Mico R, Espana E, Menezo JL. Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:353-356. (Pubitemid 36605375)
45. Hiraoka T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y, Takahira T, Kakita T, Oshika T. Mesopic contrast sensitivity and ocular higher-order aberrations after overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:645-655.