The effect of stem design on end-of-stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 7 SUPPL., 2004, Pages 119-124

  Barrack, Robert L ^a,b   Stanley, Tom ^a   Burt, Mark ^a   Hopkins, Shelby ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

cobalt chrome stems; stem pain; titanium stems; TKA; total knee arthoplasty

Indexed keywords

COBALT; TITANIUM;

AGED; ANALGESIA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COST; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SOLID STATE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; X RAY FILM;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHROMIUM; COBALT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 5344256906     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.009     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Albrektsson B.E.J., Carlsson L.V., Freeman M.A.R. The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty a roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 72:1990;252
2. Barrack R.L., Rorabeck C., Burt M., Sawhney J. Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 367:1999;216
3. Belmar C.B., Barth P.C., Lonner J.H., Lotke P.A. The use of fully cemented stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 14:1999;263
4. Bertin K.C., Freeman M.A.R., Samuelson K.M., et al. Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 67:1985;242
5. Bourne R.B., Crawford H.A. Principles of revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 29:1998;331
6. Cameron H.U., Jung Y.B. Noncemented stem tibial component in total knee replacement the 2 to 6 year results. Can J Surg. 6:1993;555
7. Elia E.A., Lotke P.A. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty associated with significant bone loss. Clin Orthop. 271:1991;114
8. Engh G.A., Herzwurm P.J., Parks N.L. Treatment of major defects of bone with bulk allografts and stemmed components during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 79:1997;1030
9. Fehring T.K., Odum S., Olekson C., et al. Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty a comparative analysis. Clin Orthop. 416:2003;217
10. Gofton W.T., Tsigaras H., Butler R.A., et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop. 404:2002;158
11. Haas S.B., Insall J.N., Montgomery W. III, Windsor R.E. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 77:1995;1700
12. Jazrawi L.M., Bai B., Kummer F.J., et al. The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 16:2001;759
13. Kirk P.G. Selecting an implant a comparison of revision implant systems. Engh G.A., Rorabeck C.H. Revision total knee arthroplasty. 1997;137 Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
14. Nelson C.L., Lonner J.H., Rand J.A., Lotke P.A. Strategies of stem fixation and the role of supplemental bone graft in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85:(Suppl 1):2003;S52
15. Parks N.L., Topoleski L.D.T. Revision total knee implants materials and design considerations. Engh G.A., Rorabeck C.H. Revision total knee arthroplasty. 1997;121 Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
16. Parsley B.S., Sugano N. Mechanical alignment of cementless stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 13:1998;222
17. Stern S.H., Wills R.D., Gilbert J.L. The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 345:1997;44
18. Van Lenthe G.H., Willems M.M., Verdonschot N., et al. Stemmed femoral knee prostheses effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss. Acta Orthop Scand. 73:2002;630
19. van Loon C.J., Kyriazopoulos A., Verdonschot N., et al. The role of femoral stem extension in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 378:2000;282
20. Whaley A.L., Trousdale R.T., Rand J.A., Hanssen A.D. Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 18:2003;592
21. Zahiri C.A., Schmalzried T.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., Amstutz H.C. Assessing the activity of total joint replacement patients comparison of four methods. Orthop Trans. 22:1999;738
22. Barrack R.L., Engh G.A., Rorabeck C., et al. Patient satisfaction and outcome following septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 14:1999;248
23. Barrack R.L., Smith P., Munn B., et al. Comparison of surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty The Ranawat Award. Clin Orthop. 356:1998;16
24. Amstutz H.C., Thomas B.J., Jinnah R., et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 66:1984;228
25. Barrack R.L. Evolution of the rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 392:2001;292
26. Barrack R.L., Lyons T.R., Ingraham R.Q., Johnson J.C. The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 15:2000;858