Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 367, Issue , 1999, Pages 216-225

  Barrack, Robert L ^a   Rorabeck, Cecil ^b   Burt, Mark ^a   Sawhney, Jaswin ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

EID: 0032696478     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199910000-00027     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Albrektsson BEJ, Carlsson LV, Freeman MAR: The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 72B: 252-258, 1990.
2. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al: Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 66A:228-241, 1984.
3. Barrack RL, Engh GA, Rorabeck C, Sawhney J, Woolfrey M: Patient satisfaction and outcome following septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:248-249, 1999.
4. Barrack RL, Hoffman GJ, Tejeiro WV, Carpenter LJ: Surgeon work input and risk in primary versus revision total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10: 281-286, 1995.
5. Barrack RL, Paprosky WG, Palafox AJ, et al: The incidence and severity of thigh pain following total hip arthroplasty with proximally coated, fully coated and cemented stems. Orthop Trans 22:41-42, 1999.
6. Belmar CB, Barth PC, Lonner JH, Lotke PA: The use of fully cemented stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:263, 1999. Abstract.
7. Bert JM, McShane M: Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem to improve tibial implant stability in cemented total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 356: 73-78, 1998.
8. Bertin KC, Freeman MAR, Samuelson KM, Ratcliffe SS, Todd RC: Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 67B:242-248, 1985.
9. Bourne RB, Crawford HA: Principles of revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 29: 331-337, 1998.
10. Bugbee WD, Engh GA, Ammeem DJ: Do clinical results justify the use of revision total knee implant systems. J Arthroplasty 13:229, 1998. Abstract.
11. Cameron HU, Jung YB: Noncemented stem tibial component in total knee replacement: The 2 to 6 year results. Can J Surg 6:555-559, 1993.
12. Campbell ACL, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Chess D, Nott L: Thigh pain and cementless hip arthroplasty-annoyance or ill omen? J Bone Joint Surg 74B:63-66, 1992.
13. Cook SD, Barrack RL, Thomas KA, Haddad RJ: Quantitative histologic analysis of tissue growth into porous total knee components. J Arthroplasty 3:249-262, 1988.
14. Elia EA, Lotke PA: Results of revision total knee arthroplasty associated with significant bone loss. Clin Orthop 271:114-121, 1991.
15. Engh GA, Herzwurm PJ, Parks NL: Treatment of major defects of bone with bulk allografts and stemmed components during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 79A:1030-1039, 1997.
16. Ewald PC: The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9-12, 1989.
17. Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery III W, Windsor RE: Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:1700-1707, 1995.
18. Hedley AK, Gruen TAW, Borden LS, et al: Two Year Follow-Up of the PCA Noncemented Total Hip Replacement. In Brand RA (ed). The Hip: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis, CV Mosby 225-250, 1986.
19. Insall JN: Revision of Aseptic Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty. In Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aglietti P (eds). Surgery of the Knee. Ed 2. New York, Churchill Livingstone 935-957, 1993.
20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13-14, 1989.
21. Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, Stuchin SA: The effect of stem length, diameter and the use of cement on tibial component fixation stability. J Arthroplasty 14:262-263, 1999.
22. Jones KJ, Dorey F, Amstutz HC, Navarro RA, Chow GH: Thigh pain in total hip arthroplasty with cemented femoral components. Orthop Trans 16:669, 1992.
23. Kirk PG: Selecting an Implant: A Comparison of Revision Implant Systems. In Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds). Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins 137-166, 1997.
24. Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD: Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 309:116-123, 1994.
25. Parks NL, Topoleski LDT: Revision Total Knee Implants: Materials and Design Considerations. In Engh GA, Rorabeck CH (eds). Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins 121-136, 1997.
26. Parsley BS, Sugano N: Mechanical alignment of cementless stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:222, 1998. Abstract.
27. Stern SH, Willis D, Gilbert JL: The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 345:44-52, 1997.
28. Vince KG, Long W: Revision knee arthroplasty: The limits of press-fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop 317:172-177, 1995.
29. Ware JE Jr: SF-36 Health Survey: Manual & Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 1993.
30. Whiteside LA: Cementless revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 286:160-167, 1993.
31. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC: Assessing the activity of total joint replacement patients: Comparison of four methods. Orthop Trans 22:738-739, 1999