A latent transition analysis of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through adolescence

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 411-427

  Marcoulides, George A ^a   Gottfried, Adele Eskeles ^b   Gottfried, Allen W ^c   Oliver, Pamella H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic instrinsic motivation; Longitudinal modeling; Markov Chain models

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349154199     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: 17444187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803610802337665     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Berlyne, D.E. (1971). What next? Concluding summary. In H.I. Day, D.E. Berlyne, & D.E. Hunt (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education (pp. 186-196). Toronto, Canada: Holt, Rinehart & Winston of Canada.
2. Bollen, K.A., & Curran, P.J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation approach. New York: Wiley.
3. Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Chung, H., Park, Y., & Lanza, S.T. (2005). Latent transition analysis with covariates: Pubertal timing and substance use behaviours in adolescent females. Statistics in Medicine, 24, 895-910.
5. Collins, L.M., & Cliff, N. (1990). Using the longitudinal Guttman simplex as a basis for measuring growth. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 128-134.
6. Gagné, P. (2006). Mean and covariance structure mixture models. In G.R. Hancock & R.O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 197-224). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
7. Gottfried, A., & Gottfried, A. (in press). Paths from gifted motivation to leadership. In S.E. Murphy & R.J. Reichard (Eds.), Early development and leadership: Building the next generation of leaders. New York: Psychology Press/Routledge.
8. Gottfried, A.E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 631-635.
9. Gottfried, A.E. (1986). Children's Academic Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (CAIMI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10. Gottfried, A.E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538.
11. Gottfried, A.E. (2008). Home environment and academic intrinsic motivation. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology (pp. 485-490). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Gottfried, A.E., Fleming, J.S., & Gottfried, A.W. (1994). Role of parental motivational practices in children's academic intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 104-113.
13. Gottfried, A.E., Fleming, J.S., & Gottfried, A.W. (1998). Role of cognitively stimulating home environment in children's academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 69, 1448-1460.
14. Gottfried, A.E., Fleming, J.S., & Gottfried, A.W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3-13.
15. Gottfried, A.E., & Gottfried, A.W. (2004). Toward the development of a conceptualization of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 121-132.
16. Gottfried, A.E., & Gottfried, A.W. (in press). Development of gifted motivation from childhood through young adulthood: Longitudinal research and implications for gifted assessment and education. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook of giftedness and talent. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science.
17. Gottfried, A.E., Gottfried, A.W., Morris, P., & Cook, C. (2008). Low academic intrinsic motivation as a risk factor for adverse educational outcomes: A longitudinal study from early childhood through early adulthood. In C. Hudley & A.E. Gottfried (Eds.), Academic motivation and the culture of schooling (pp. 36-39). New York: Oxford Press.
18. Gottfried, A.E., Marcoulides, G.A., Gottfried, A.W., Oliver, P., & Guerin, D. (2007). Multivariate latent change modeling of developmental decline in academic intrinsic math motivation and achievement: Childhood through adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 317-327.
19. Gottfried, A.W. (1985). Measures of socioeconomic status in child development research: Data and recommendations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 31, 85-92.
20. Gottfried, A.W., & Gottfried, A.E. (1984). Home environment and cognitive development in young children of middle-socioeconomic-status families. In A.W. Gottfried (Ed.), Home environment and early cognitive development: Longitudinal research (pp. 57-115). New York: Academic Press.
21. Gottfried, A.W., Gottfried, A.E., Bathurst, K., & Guerin, D. (1994). Gifted IQ: Early developmental aspects. New York: Plenum.
22. Gottfried, A.W., Gottfried, A.E., Bathurst, K., Guerin, D.W., & Parramore, M.M. (2003). Socioeconomic status in children's development and family environment: Infancy through adolescence. In M.H. Bornstein & R.H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 189-207). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Gottfried, A.W., Gottfried, A.E., Cook, C.R., & Morris, P.E. (2005). Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal study from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 172-186.
24. Gottfried, A.W., Gottfried, A.E., & Guerin, D.W. (2006). The Fullerton Longitudinal Study: A long-term investigation of intellectual and motivational giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 430-450.
25. Gottfried, A.W., Gottfried, A.E., & Guerin, D.W. (in press). Issues in early prediction and identification of intellectual giftedness. In F.D. Horowitz, R. Subotnik, & D. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span. Washington, DC: APA Books.
26. Graham, J.W., Collins, L.M., Wugalter, S.E., Chung, N.K., & Hansen, W.B. (1991). Modeling transitions in latent-stage sequential processes: A substance use prevention example. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 19, 48-57.
27. Guerin, D.W., & Gottfried, A.W. (1994). Developmental stability and change in parent reports of temperament: A ten-year longitudinal investigation from infancy through preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40, 334-355.
28. Guerin, D.W., Gottfried, A.W., Oliver, P.H., & Thomas, C.W. (2003). Temperament: Infancy through adolescence. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
29. Heckman, J.J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900-1902.
30. Hollingshead, A.B. (1975). Four Factor Index of Social Status. Unpublished manuscript,Yale University, Department of Sociology, New Haven, CT.
31. Hunt, J.McV. (1971). Intrinsic motivation and psychological development. In H.M. Schroeder & P. Suedfeld (Eds.), Personality theory and information processing (pp. 131-177). New York: Ronald Press.
32. Kagan, J., Snidman, N., & Arcus, D. (1998). The value of extreme groups. In R.B. Cairns, L.R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 65-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Lubke, G.H., & Muthén, B.O. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21-39.
34. Marcoulides, G.A., & Saunders, C. (2006). PLS: A silver bullet? MIS Quarterly, 30, 3-10.
35. Muthén, B.O. (2002). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides & R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599-620.
37. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2006). Mplus user's guide;; (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Authors.
38. Nylund, K.L. (2007, August). Extensions of LTA with covariates and distal outcomes to study peer victimization. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
39. Nylund, K.L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B.O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535-569.
40. O'Dwyer, L.M. (2005). Examining the variability of mathematics performance and its correlate using data from TIMSS '95 and TIMSS '99. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 155-177.
41. Otis, N., Grouzet, F.M.E., & Pelletier, L.G. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 170-183.
42. Radke-Yarrow, M. (1998). Comments on chapter 4. In R.B. Cairns, L.R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 80-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G.A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Rindskopf, D. (2001). The next steps in latent variable models of change. In L.M. Collins & A.G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 323-332). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Roberts, B.W., & DelVecchio, W.F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25.
46. Robins, R.W., & Trzesniewski, K.H. (2005). Self-esteem development across the life-span. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 158-162.
47. Roderick, M., & Camburn, E. (1999). Risk and recovery from course failure in the early years of high school. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 303-343.
48. Russell, S.H., Hancock, MP., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548-549.
49. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
50. Shen, C. (2002). Revisiting the relationship between students' achievement and their self-perceptions: A cross-national analysis based on TIMSS 1999 data. Assessment in Education, 9, 161-184.
51. Stodolosky, S. (1988). The subject matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Stodolosky, S., Salk, S., & Glaessner, B. (1991). Student views about learning math and social studies. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 89-116.
53. Uguroglu, M.E., & Walberg, H.J. (1979). Motivation and achievement: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 16, 375-389.
54. Wachs, T.D. (1991). Environmental considerations in studies with nonextreme groups. In T.D. Wachs & R. Plomin (Eds.), Conceptualization and measurement of organism-environment interaction (pp. 44-67). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.
56. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Schiefele, U. Roeser, R.W., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 933-1002). New York: Wiley.
57. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Yoon, K.S., Harold, R.D., Arbreton, A.J.A., Freedman-Doan, C., et al. (1997). Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-469.