Urban regimes and the sporting events agenda: A cross-national comparison of civic development strategies

Journal of Sport Management

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 603-627

  Misener, Laura ^a   Mason, Daniel S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349151755     PISSN: 08884773     EISSN: 1543270X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsm.22.5.603     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alberta Sport Plan Task Force. (2003). A new century for amateur sport: From participation to excellence. Edmonton: Alberta Sport, Recreation, Parks and Wildlife Foundation.
2. Alberta Sport. Recreation, Parks and Wildlife Foundation. (2006). Hosting program. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://www.cd.gov.ab.ca/ asrpwf/programs/funding/hosting/index.asp
3. Andranovich, G., Burbank, M.J., & Heying, C.H. (2001). Olympic cities: Lessons learned from mega-event politics. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, 113-131.
4. Bennett, L., & Spirou, C. (2006). Political leadership and stadium development in Chicago: Some cautionary notes on the uses of regime analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 38-53.
5. Black, D.R., & van der Westhuizen, J. (2004). The allure of global games for 'semi-peripheral' polities and spaces: a research agenda. Third World Quarterly, 25, 1195-1214.
6. Canadian Heritage. (2004). Summative evaluation of the Department of Canadian Heritage's Sport Hosting Program: Final report. Ottawa: Department of Canadian Heritage by Prairie Research Associates Inc.
7. Chapin, T.S. (2004). Sports facilities as urban redevelopment catalysts. Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association, 70, 191-209.
8. City of Melbourne. (2004). Council elections. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/info
9. City of Melbourne. (2003). City of Melbourne national and international sports marketing policy. Melbourne City Council.
10. City of Melbourne. (2002). The city of Melbourne sports policy. Melbourne City Council.
11. Cochrane, A., Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (1996). Manchester plays games: Exploring the local politics of globalisation. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 33, 1319-1336.
12. Davies, J.S. (2003). Partnerships versus regimes: Explaining why regime theory cannot explain urban coalitions in the UK. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 253-269.
13. Department of Culture. Media, and Sport. (2002). Game plan: a strategy for delivering government's sport and physical activity objectives. London: Office of the Prime Minister.
14. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions. (2000). Indices of deprivation for wards in England. London: Office of Prime Minister.
15. Department of Planning and Development. (1995). Living suburbs. Melbourne, Australia: DPD.
16. Department of Sustainability and Environment. (2005). Melbourne 2030. State Government of Victoria.
17. Department for Victorian Communities. (2005). Sport and recreation 2005-2010. A five year strategic plan for sport and recreation Victoria. Melbourne, Australia: DVC
18. DiGaetano, A., & Klemanski, J. (1999). Power and city governance: Comparative perspectives on urban development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Dovey, K., & Sandercock, L. (2002). Hype and hope. Imagining Melbourne's docklands. City, 6(1), 83-101.
20. Dowding, K. (2001). Explaining urban regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 7-19.
21. Economic Development Edmonton. (2002). Annual report. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://www.edmonton.com/categorydocuments/ Annual%20Reports_10/2002AnnualReport.pdf
22. Economic Development Edmonton. (2000). Annual report. Retrieved May 15, 2003, http://www.edmonton.com/categorydocuments/Annual%20Reports_10/ 2000AnnualReport.pdf
23. Edmonton Economic Development Corporation. (2007). Greater Edmonton economic outlook 2007. Retrieved September 6,2006, from http://edmonton.com/ categorydocuments/Statistics_3/Edmonton%20Economic%20Outlook%202007%20final.pdf
24. Edmonton Events International. (2007). About us. Retrieved September 6,2006, from http://www.edmontoneventsinternational.com
25. Edmonton Festival City. (June 1, 2004). News. Retrieved September 6,2006, http://festival-city.ca/news/2004festivals_chamber.aspx
26. Edmonton Planning and Development. (2004). Economic trends. Retrieved August 10, 2006, http://www.edmonton.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/ PTARGS_0_2_284_220_0_43/http://CMSServer/COEWeb/ infrastructure+planning+and+building/economic+information/Economic+Trends.htm
27. Elkin, S.L. (1987). City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Fagan, R.H., & Webber, M. (1999). Global restructuring: The Australian experience. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
29. Greater Edmonton Branding Initiative. (2003). Final research report. Edmonton, Canada: Calder Bateman. Communications.
30. Hall, C.M. (2004). Sports tourism and urban regeneration. In B. Ritchie & D. Adair (Eds.), Sports tourism. Interrelationships, impacts and issues (pp. 192-205). Toronto, Canada: Channelview Publications.
31. Henry, I., & Paramio-Salcines, J.L. (1999). Sport and the analysis of symbolic regimes: A case study of the city of Sheffield. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 641-666.
32. Home, J., & Manzenreiter, W. (2006). Sport mega-events: Social scientific perspectives of a global phenomenon. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
33. Imbroscio, D. (2003). Overcoming the neglect of economics in urban regime theory. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 271-284.
34. Lawless, P. (1994). Partnership in urban regeneration in the United Kingdom: The Sheffield central area study. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 31, 1303-1324.
35. Lefebvre, M., Arcand, A., Clavet, F., & Sutherland, G. (2005). Edmonton metropolitan outlook 1, winter 2005. Ottawa, Canada: Conference Board, of Canada.
36. Lowes, M. (2004). Neoliberal power politics and the controversial citing of the Australian Grand Prix Motorsport event in an urban park. Loisir et Société. Society and Leisure, 27, 69-88.
37. Manchester 2002 Ltd. (1999). Corporate plan. Manchester 2002 Ltd.
38. Manchester City Council. (2006). Annual reports and accounts. City of Manchester.
39. Manchester City Council. (2005). The city of Manchester. Retrieved February 15, 2006, from http://www.manchester.gov.uk/corporate/thecity
40. Manchester City Council. (2002). The Manchester community strategy 2002-2012. Manchester, UK: City of Manchester.
41. Marketing Manchester. (2005). Annual reports and accounts 2004/2005. Manchester, UK: Marketing Manchester.
42. Mees, P. (2003). Paterson's curse: The attempt to revive metropolitan planning in Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research, 21, 287-299.
43. Melbourne City Council. (2004). 2003-2004 Annual Report. City of Melbourne.
44. Melbourne City Council. (2005). 2004-2005 Annual Report. City of Melbourne.
45. Manchester Investment and Development Agency. (2006). Manchester pic. 2006 Business in greater Manchester: An insider annual report in association with MIDAS. Manchester, UK: MIDAS.
46. Misener, L., & Mason, D.S. (2006). Creating community networks: Can sporting events offer meaningful sources of social capital? Managing Leisure, 11, 39-56.
47. Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 810-835.
48. National Statistics. (2001). Census 2001. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/pop2001/manchester.asp
49. New East Manchester. (2003). Annual reports and accounts 2002/2003. Manchester: NEM.
50. Noll, R., & Zimbalist, A. (Eds.). (1997). Sports, jobs, and taxes: The economic impact of sports teams and stadiums. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
51. North West Development Agency. (2004). Commonwealth Games benefits study. Warrington, UK: Faber Maunsell.
52. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2001). Urban white paper - Regeneration in our towns and cities. British Government report on urban regeneration. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from http://www.odpm.gov.uk/ stellent/groups/odpm_urbanpolicy/documents/pdf/odpm_urbpol_pdf_608358.pdf
53. Peck, J., & Ward, K. (Elds.). (2002). City of revolution: restructuring Manchester. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
54. Pelissero, J.P., Henschen, B., & Sidlow, E.I. (1991). Urban regimes, sports stadiums, and the politics of economic development agendas in Chicago. Policy Studies Review, 10, 117-129.
55. Pierre, J. (2005). Comparative urban governance: Uncovering complex causalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 446-462.
56. Quilley, S. (1999). Entrepreneurial Manchester: Elite genesis of consensus. Antipode, 31, 185-211.
57. Robson, B. (2002). Mancunian ways: The politics of regeneration. In J. Peck & K. Ward (Eds.), City of revolution: Restructuring Manchester (pp. 34-49). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
58. Rosentraub, M.S. (2000). Sports facilities, redevelopment, and the centrality of downtown areas: Observations and lessons from experiences in the Rustbelt and Sunbelt City. Marquette Sports Law Journal, 10, 219-235.
59. Rosentraub, M.S. (2006). The local contest of a sports strategy for economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 278-291.
60. Rosentraub, M.S., Swindell, D., Pryzvylski, M., & Mullins, D.R. (1994). Sport and down-town development strategy: If you build, it, will jobs come? Journal of Urban Affairs, 16, 221-239.
61. Sack, A., & Johnson, A. (1996). Politics, economic development, and the Volvo International Tennis Tournament. Journal of Sport Management, 10, 1-14.
62. Schimmel, K.S. (2001). Sport matters: Urban regime theory and urban regeneration in the late-capitalist era. In C. Gratton & I.P. Henry (Eds.), Sport in the city: The role of sport in the economic and social regeneration (pp. 259-277). London: Routledge.
63. Schimmel, K.S. (2006). Deep play: sports mega-events and urban social conditions in the USA. In J. Home & W. Manzenreiter (Eds.), Sport mega-events: Social scientific perspectives of a global phenomenon (pp. 160-174). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
64. Schimmel, K.S., Ingham, A.G., & Howell, J.W. (1993). Professional team sport and the American city: Urban politics and franchise relocations. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
65. Sellers, J.M. (2005). Re-placing the nation. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 419-445.
66. Sites, W. (1997). The limits of urban regime theory. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 536-557.
67. Stoker, G., & Mossberger, K. (1994). Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environment and Planning. C., Government & Policy, 12, 195-212.
68. Stone, C.N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
69. Stone, C.N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, 1-28.
70. Stone, C.N. (2004). It's more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 1-19.
71. Tilly, C. (1984). Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russell Sage.
72. U.K. Sport (2003). Road to Athens: Annual review 2002/2003. Retrieved July 29, 2005, from http://www.uksport.gov.uk/assets/File/ Generic_Template_Documents/Publications/Corporate_Publications/ Annual_Review2002_2003_1_4.pdf
73. Victoria Major Events Corporation. (2006a). Structure. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://www.vmec.com.au/struc/index.htm.
74. Victoria Major Events Corporation. (2006b). Event capital. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://www.vmec.com.au/event.html
75. Ward, K. (1997). Rigourising regimes. Contemporary Policy Studies, 1-2, 181-197.
76. Ward, K. (2003). Entrepreneurial urbanism, state restructuring and civilizing 'New' East Manchester. Area, 35, 116-127.
77. Williams, G. (1996). City profile: Manchester. Cities (London, England), 13, 203-212.
78. Williams, G. (2003). Enterprising city centre: Manchester's development challenge. London: E. & F. N. Spon.
79. Whitson, D., & Macintosh, D. (1996). The global circus: International sport, tourism, and the marketing of cities. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 20, 278-295.