Matching the message to the medium: Results from an experiment on internet survey email contacts

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 498-509

  Klofstad, Casey A ^a   Boulianne, Shelley ^b   Basson, Danna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^c MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact; Email; Internet; Invitation to participate; Response rate; Web survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349120215     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439308314145     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Birnholtz, J.P., Horn, D.B., Finholt, T.A., & Bae, S.J. (2004). The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents. Social Science Computer Review, 22 (3). 355-362.
2. Bosnjak, M., & Tuten, T.L. (2003). Prepaid and promised incentives in web surveys: An experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 21 (2). 208-217.
3. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 60 (6). 821-836.
4. Couper, M.P., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F.G., & Crawford, S.D. (2004 b). What they see is what we get." Social Science Computer Review, 22 (1). 111-127.
5. Couper, M.P., Tourangeau, R., & Kenyon, K. (2004 a). Picture this! Exploring visual effects in web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (2). 255-266.
6. Couper, M.P., Traugott, M.W., & Lamias, M.J. (2001). Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65 (2). 230-253.
7. Crawford, S.D. (2004, May). A researcher's guide to web survey implementation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, AZ.
8. Crawford, S.D., Couper, M.P., & Lamias, M.J. (2001). Web surveys: Perceptions of burden. Social Science Computer Review, 19 (2). 146-162.
9. Crawford, S.D., McCabe, S., Saltz, B., Boyd, C., Freisthler, B., & Paschall, M.J. (2004, May). Gaining respondent cooperation in college web-based alcohol surveys: findings from experiments at two universities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, AZ.
10. Fricker, S., Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2005). An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (3). 370-392.
11. Groves, R.M., Presser, S., & Dipko, S. (2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (1). 2-31.
12. Groves, R.M., Singer, E., & Corning, A. (2000). Leverage-salience theory of survey participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (3). 299-308.
13. Heerwegh, D. (2005). Effects of personal salutations in e-mail invitations to participate in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (4). 588-598.
14. Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2002 a). An evaluation of the effect of response formats on data quality in web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 20 (4). 471-484.
15. Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2002 b). Web surveys: The effect of controlling survey access using PIN numbers. Social Science Computer Review, 20 (1). 10-21.
16. Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2003). An evaluation of the semiautomatic login procedure to control web survey access. Social Science Computer Review, 21 (2). 223-234.
17. Kaplowitz, M.D., Hadlock, T.D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (1). 94-101.
18. Krosnick, J.A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 213-236.
19. McCarthy, J.S., Beckler, D.G., & Qualey, S.M. (2006). An analysis of the relationship between survey burden and nonresponse: If we bother them more, are they less cooperative? Journal of Official Statistics, 22 (1). 97-112.
20. Peytchev, A., Couper, M., McCabe, S., & Crawford, S. (2006). Web survey design: paging vs. scrolling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70 (4). 596-607.
21. Porter, S.R., & Whitcomb, M.E. (2003). The impact of contact type on web survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67 (4). 579-588.
22. Sharp, L.M., & Frankel, J. (1983). Respondent burden: a test of some common assumptions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47 (1). 36-53.
23. Smyth, J.D., Dillman, D.A., Christian, L.M., & Stern, M.J. (2006). Comparing check-all and forced-choice question formats in web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70 (1). 66-77.
24. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2003). Clarify: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu
25. Trouteaud, A.R. (2004). How you ask counts: a test of internet-related components of response rates to a web-based survey. Social Science Computer Review, 22 (3). 385-392.
26. University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Information Technology. (2006). UW-Madison computing survey. Summary reports retrieved July 11, 2007 from http://www.doit.wisc.edu/about/research
27. Whitcomb, M.E., & Porter, S.R. (2004). Mail contacts: A test of complex graphical designs in survey research. Social Science Computer Review, 22 (3). 370-376.