A 3-factor model for the FACIT-Sp

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 908-916

  Canada, Andrea L ^a   Murphy, Patricia E ^a   Fitchett, George ^a   Peterman, Amy H ^b   Schover, Leslie R ^c  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Measurement; Oncology; Quality of life; Religion; Spirituality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BRIEF SYMPTOM INVENTORY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURVIVOR; COGNITION; DEPRESSION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC ILLNESS THERAPY SPIRITUAL WELLBEING SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIGION; SOMATIZATION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HODGKIN DISEASE; HUMANS; LYMPHOMA, NON-HODGKIN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NEOPLASMS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIGION AND PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICK ROLE; SPIRITUALITY; SURVIVORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 53349102168     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1307     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Silberfarb PM, Anderson KM, Rundle AC, Holland JC, Cooper MR, McIntyre OR. Mood and clinical status in patients with multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 1991;9: 2219-2224.
2. Roberts JA, Brown D, Elkins T et al. Factors influencing views of patients with gynecological cancer about end-of-life decisions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:166-172.
3. Brady MJ, Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Mo M, Cella D. A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology. Psycho-Oncology 1999; 8:417-428.
4. Holland JC, Passik S, Kash KM et al. The role of religious and spiritual beliefs in coping with malignant melanoma. Psycho-Oncology 1998;8:14-26.
5. Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group. Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness, Spirituality for Use in Health Research: A Report of a National Working Group. Fetzer Institute: Kalamazoo, MI, 2003. (Available from: http://www.fetzer.org/ PDF/Total_Fetzer_Book.pdf).
6. Hill PC, Pargament KI. Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: implications for physical and mental health research. Am Psychol 2003;58:64-74.
7. Stefanek M, McDonald PG, Hess SA. Religion, spirituality, and cancer: current status and methodological challenges. Psycho-Oncology 2005;14:450-463.
8. Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hernandez L, Cella D. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med 2002;24:49-58.
9. Daugherty CK, Fitchett G, Murphy PE et al. Trusting God and medicine: spirituality in advanced cancer patients volunteering for clinical trials of experimental agents. Psycho-Oncology 2005; 14:135-146.
10. Nelson CJ, Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W, Galietta M. Spirituality, religion, and depression in the terminally ill. Psychosomatics 2002; 43:213-220.
11. Tomich PL, Helgeson VS. Five years later: a cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psycho-Oncology 2002;11:154-169.
12. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:570-579.
13. Noguchi W, Morita S, Ohno T et al. Spiritual needs in cancer patients and spiritual care based on logotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2006;14:65-70.
14. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1171-1178.
15. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med 1997;19:179-186.
16. Derogatis LR. BSI 18: Brief Symptom Inventory 18: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. NCS Pearson: Minneapolis, MN, 2001.
17. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Jacobsen P et al. A new psychosocial screening instrument for use with cancer patients. Psychosomatics 2001;42:241-246.
18. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8.8 and PRELIS 2.8 [Computer Software]. Scientific Software International, Inc.: Lincolnwood, IL, 2006.
19. Jöreskog K. 2005. Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Variables Using LISREL. Accessed online December 12, 2006. Available from: http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf
20. Jöreskog K, Moustakis I. 2006. Factor Analysis of Ordinal Variables with Full Information Maximum Likelihood. Accessed online December 12, 2006. Available from: http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/ techdocs/orfiml.pdf
21. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 1999; 6:1-55.
22. Jöreskog K. 1999. How Large Can a Standardized Coefficient be? Accessed online December 12, 2006. Available from: http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdf
23. Hägglund G. Factor analysis by instrumental variables methods. Psychometrika 1982;47:209-222.
24. Colgrove LA, Kim Y, Thompson N. The effect of spirituality and gender on the quality of life of spousal caregivers of cancer survivors. Ann Behav Med 2007; 33:90-98.
25. Ferraro KF, Kelley-Moore JA. Religious consolation among men and women: do health problems spur seeking? J Sci Study Relig 2000; 39:220-234.
26. Kristeller IL, Rhode M, Cripe LD, Sheets V. Oncologist-Assisted Spiritual Intervention Study (OASIS): patient acceptability and initial evidence of effects. Int J Psychiatry Med 2005;35:329-347.
27. Woods CM. Careless responding to reverse-worded items: implications for confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2006; 28:189-194.
28. Carleton RN, Park I, Asmundson GJ. The Illness/Injury Sensitivity Index: an examination of construct validity. Depress Anxiety 2006; 23:340-346.
29. Wong N, Rindfleisch A, Burroughs JE. Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. J Consum Res 2003;30:72-91.
30. Moadel AB, Morgan C, Dutcher J. Psychosocial needs assessment among an underserved, ethnically diverse cancer patient population. Cancer 2007;109(Suppl. 2): 446-454.
31. Simon CE, Crowther M, Higgerson HK. The stage-specific role of spirituality among African-American Christian women throughout the breast cancer experience. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2007;13:26-34.
32. Koenig HG, McCullough ME, Larson DB. Handbook of Religion and Health. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2001.
33. Glicksman A. A mighty fortress is our atheism: defining the nature of religiousness in the elderly. J Religious Gerontol 2002; 14:69-83.
34. Hall DE, Koenig KG, Meador KG. Conceptualizing 'Religion:' how language shapes and constrains knowledge in the study of religion and health. Perspect Biol Med 2004;47:386-401.