Processes responsible of the structural diversity of the Cyperaceae synflorescence: Hypothetical evolutionary trends

Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants

Volumn 203, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 640-647

  Guarise, Nicolás Javier ^a   Vegetti, Abelardo Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL LITORAL   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Evolution; Inflorescence; Phylogenetic pathways; Processes; Structure; Variation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; MONOCOTYLEDON; PHYLOGENY; PLANT ARCHITECTURE; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

CYPERACEAE; JUNCACEAE;

EID: 53249134648     PISSN: 03672530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2007.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aagesen L. Phylogeny on the tribe Colletieae, Rhamnaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 131 (1999) 1-43
2. Alves, M.V., 2003. Hypolytrum Rich (Cyperaceae) nos Neotrópicos. XII. Tesis, Inst. Biociências University São Paulo, Brasil, 163pp.
3. Alves M.V., Wanderley M.G.L., and Thomas W.W. Typology of the inflorescence in species of Hypolytrum Rich. (Cyperaceae) from Brazil. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 72 (2000) 59-73
4. Barros, M., 1969. Juncaceae. Flora Patagónica. En: Correa, M.N. (Ed.), Flora Patagónica. Colección Científica del INTA, II, pp. 107-137.
5. Browning J., and Gordon Gray K.D. The inflorescence in southern African species of Bolboschoenus (Cyperaceae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 36 (1999) 81-97
6. Bruhl J. Sedge genera of the world: relationships and a new classification of the Cyperaceae. Aust. Syst. Bot. 8 (1995) 125-305
7. Cronquist A. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. The New York Botanical Garden (1981), Columbia University Press, New York
8. Dalgrehn R.M.T., Clifford H.T., and Yeo P.F. The Families of the Monocotyledons: Structure, Evolution and Taxonomy: VI-XII (1985), Springer, Berlin
9. De Pinna M.C.C. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7 (1991) 367-394
10. Goetghebeur P. Cyperaceae. In: Kubitzki K., Huber H., Rudall P.J., Stevens P.S., and Stützel T. (Eds). The Families and Genera of Plants vol. 4 (1998), Springer, Berlin 141-190
11. Guaglianone E.R. Caracteres diferenciales entre Cyperus rotundus L. y C. esculentus L.: presencia de un pliegue ligular en el primero. Rev. Asoc. Argent. Malezas 6 (1978) 21-35
12. Guaglianone, E.R., 1996. Cyperaceae. En: Lahitte, H.B., Hurrell, J.A. (Eds.), Las Plantas Hidrófilas de la Isla Martín García Buenos Aires. Ser. Informes 52, 70-96 y 217 (Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas).
13. Guarise N.J., and Vegetti A.C. Tipología de las Inflorescencias de Cyperus L. secc. Luzulae Kük (Cyperoideae - Cyperaceae). Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 40 Suppl. (2005) 44
14. Guarise, N.J., Vegetti, A.C., 2008. Inflorescences structure of Cyperus L. section Luzuloidei Kunth (Cyperaceae). Plant Syst. Evol., in press.
15. Haines R.W. Prophylls and branching in Cyperaceae. J. E. Afr. Nat. Hist. Soc. 26 (1966) 51-78
16. Haines R.W., and Lye K.A. The Sedges and Rushes of East Africa (1983), East African Natural History Society, Nairobi 404pp
17. Heinzen F.A., and Vegetti A.C. Typology of the inflorescence in Cyperus corymbosus var. subnodosus and C. rotundus (Cyperaceae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 68 (1994) 263-273
18. Judd W.S., Campbell C.S., Kellogg E.A., and Stevens P.F. Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach (1999), Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA 464pp
19. Kellogg E.A. A model of inflorescence development. In: Wilson K.L., and Morrison D.A. (Eds). Monocots: Systematics and Evolution (2000), CSIRO, Melbourne 84-88
20. Köbele C.P., and Tillich H.-J. Die Infloreszenzen der Juncaceae. Sendtnera 7 (2001) 137-161
21. Kukkonen I. On the inflorescence structure in the family Cyperaceae. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 21 (1984) 257-264
22. Kukkonen I. Special features of the inflorescence structure in the family Cyperaceae. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 23 (1986) 107-119
23. Kukkonen I. The inflorescence, structure of Kobresia myosuroides and related species of sect Elyna (Cyperaceae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 27 (1990) 159-167
24. Kukkonen I. Definition of descriptive terms for the Cyperaceae. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 31 (1994) 37-43
25. Linder H.P., and Kellogg E.A. Phylogeny patterns in the Commelinid clade. In: Rudall P.J., Cribb P.J., Cutler D.F., and Humphries C.J. (Eds). Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution (1995), Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew 473-496
26. Liu Q., Zhao N., and Hao G. Inflorescence structures and evolution in subfamily Chlorideae (Gramineae). Plant Syst. Evol. 251 (2005) 183-198
27. Lucero J.J., Guarise N.J., and Vegetti A.C. Tipología de la Inflorescencia de Cyperus sección Chlorocyperus (Cyperaceae). Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 40 Suppl. (2005) 46
28. Meert M., and Goetghebeur P. Comparative floral morphology of Bisboeckelereae and Cariceae (Cyperaceae) on the basis of the anthoid concept. Bull. Soc. R. Bot. Belg. 112 (1979) 128-143
29. Mora Osejo L.E. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und vergleichenden Morphologie der Cyperaceen. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 35 (1960) 293-341
30. Mora Osejo, L.E., 1987. Estudios morfológicos autoecológicos y sistemáticos en Angiospermas. Acad. Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Ser. Jorge Álvarez Lleras 1, Bogotá.
31. Muasya A.M., Simpson D.A., Chase M.W., and Culham A. An assessment of suprageneric phylogeny in Cyperaceae using rcbL DNA sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 211 (1998) 257-271
32. Muasya, A.M., Bruhl, J.J., Simpson, D.A., Chase, M W., Culham, A., 2000. Suprageneric phylogeny of Cyperaceae: a combined analysis. In: Wilson, K.L., Morrison, D.A. (Eds.), Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, pp. 610-614.
33. Nickol M.G. Phylogeny and inflorescences of Berberidaceae, a morphological survey. Plant. Syst. Evol. (Suppl.) 9 (1995) 327-340
34. Pedersen, T.M., 1968. Cyperaceae. In: Cabrera, A.L. (Ed.), Flora de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Tomo IV (I). Colección Científica del I.N.T.A., Buenos Aires, pp. 315-421.
35. Perreta M.G., and Vegetti A.C. The inflorescence of Cyperus giganteus VAHL (Cyperaceae). Feddes. Repert. 113 (2002) 256-260
36. Plunkett G.M., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., and Brooks R.E. Phylogenetic relationships between Juncaceae and Cyperaceae: insight from rbcL sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 82 (1995) 520-525
37. Raynal J. Quelques notes morphologiques sur les Cypéracées. Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 10 (1971) 589-603
38. Raynal J. Notes cypérologiques: 19. Contribution à la classification de la sous-famille des Cyperoideae. Adansonia ser. 13 (1973) 145-171
39. Reutemann A., Guarise N.J., and Vegetti A.C. Variaciones en la estructura de las inflorescencias de Bulbostylis Kunth (Abildgaardiaeae-Cyperaceae). Bol. Soc. Arg. Bot. 40 Suppl. (2005) 46-47
40. Reznicek A.A. Evolution in sedges (Carex - Cyperaceae). Can. J. Bot. 68 (1990) 1409-1432
41. Richards J.H., Bruhl J.J., and Wilson K.L. Flower or spikelet? Understanding the morphology and development of reproductive structures in Exocarya (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae, Chrysitricheae). Am. J. Bot. 93 (2006) 1241-1250
42. Rua, G.H., 1999. Inflorescencias. Bases Teóricas para su análisis. Sociedad Argentina de Botánica, Buenos Aires.
43. Rua G.H., and Aliscioni S.S. A morphology-based cladistic analysis of Paspalum sect. Pectinata (Poaceae). Syst. Bot. 27 (2002) 489-501
44. Rua G.H., and Weberling F. Growth form and inflorescence structure of Paspalum L. (Poaceae, Paniceae): a comparative morphological approach. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 69 (1995) 363-431
45. Simpson D.A. Relationships within Cyperales. In: Rudall P.J., Cribb P.J., Cutler D.F., and Humphries C.J. (Eds). Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution (1995), Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew 497-509
46. Stebbins G.L. Evolutionary trends in the inflorescence of angiosperm. Flora 162 (1973) 501-528
47. Stebbins G.L. Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level (1974), Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA
48. Takhtajan A.L. Flowering Plants. Origin and Dispersal (1969), Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh
49. Takhtajan A.L. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. 46 (1980) 225-359
50. Thomas W.W. The systematics of Rhynchospora sect. Dichromena. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 37 (1984) 1-116
51. Tortosa R.D., Rua G., and Bartoli A. A typological analysis of the inflorescences of the genus Nassauvia (Asteraceae). Flora 199 (2004) 42-46
52. Troll W. Die Infloreszenzen, Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers vol. I (1964), Gustav Fischer, Jena
53. Troll W. Die Infloreszenzen, Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers II/1 (1969), G. Fischer, Stuttgart
54. Tucker C.S., and Grimes J. The inflorescence: introduction. Bot. Rev. 65 (1999) 303-316
55. Urdampilleta J.D., Amat A.G., and Bidau C.J. Karyotypic studies and morphological analysis of some reproductive features in five species of Conyza (Astereae: Asteraceae) from northeastern Argentina. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 40 (2005) 91-99
56. Vegetti A.C. Typology of the inflorescence in species Schoenoplectus (Cyperaceae) in Austral America. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 67 (1992) 241-249
57. Vegetti A.C. Typology of the inflorescence of Isolepis. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 68 (1994) 21-26
58. Vegetti A.C. Typological reinterpretation of the inflorescences in Cariceae (Cyperaceae). Phyton 42 (2002) 159-168
59. Vegetti A.C. Synflorescence typology in Cyperaceae. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 40 (2003) 35-46
60. Vegetti A.C., and Anton A.M. Some evolution trends in the inflorescences of Poaceae. Flora 190 (1995) 225-228
61. Vegetti A.C., and Guaglianone E.R. Estructura de las inflorescencias en especies de Rhynchospora Vahl (Cyperaceae) de América Autral. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 40 Suppl. (2005) 48
62. Vegetti A.C., and Tivano J.C. Inflorescence typology in Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 66 (1991) 323-345
63. Vrijdaghs, A., Goetghebeur, P., Smets, E., Caris, P., 2003. The unusual development of the gynoecium of Cladium mariscus (L.) Pohl (Cyperaceae). In: Symposium for Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology at Frankfurt, Germany.
64. Vrijdaghs A., Goetghebeur P., Muasya M.A., Smets E., and Caris P. The nature of the perianth in Fuirena (Cyperaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 70 (2004) 587-594
65. Vrijdaghs A., Caris P., Goetghebeur P., and Smets E. Floral ontogeny in Scirpus, Eriophorum and Dulichium (Cyperaceae), with special reference to the perianth. Ann. Bot. 95 (2005) 1199-1209
66. Vrijdaghs A., Goetghebeur P., Muasya M.A., Caris P., and Smets E. Floral ontogeny in Ficinia and Isolepis (Cyperaceae), with focus on the nature and origin of the gynophore. Ann. Bot. 96 (2005) 1247-1264
67. Weberling F. Aspectos modernos de la morfología de las inflorescencias. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 24 (1985) 1-28
68. Weberling F. Morphology of Flowers and Inflorescences (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
69. Wiley E.O. Phylogenetics (1981), Wiley, New York
70. Wilson K.L. Systematic studies in Cyperus section Pinnati (Cyperaceae). Telopea 4 3 (1991) 361-496
71. Zhang S.R. A preliminary revision of the supraspecific classification of Kobresia Wild. (Cyperaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 135 (2001) 289-294