Fit for public consumption? An exploratory study of the reporting of nutrition research in UK tabloids with regard to its accuracy, and a preliminary investigation of public attitudes towards it

Public Health Nutrition

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1124-1131

  Basu, Andrea J ^a   Hogard, Elaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Attitudes; Media; Newspapers; Nutrition Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONFUSION; FOOD SAFETY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; NUTRITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLICATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; NEWSPAPERS; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCES; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 53249107735     PISSN: 13689800     EISSN: 14752727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980007001565     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ayoob T, Duyff RL & Quagliani D (2002) Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food and nutrition misinformation. JAMA 102, 260-266.
2. Grilli R, Ramsay C & Minozzi S (2005) Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation (review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, issue 2, CD000389. http://www.mrw.interscience. wiley.com/ cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD000389/frame.htm
3. Holgardo B, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, De Irala-Estevez J, Gibney M, Kearney J & Martinez JA (2000) Sources of information about diet and health in a Mediterranean country. Eur J Public Health 10, 185-191.
4. Alden C (editor) (2005) Media Directory 2005. London: Guardian Books.
5. Food Standards Agency (2005) Consumer attitudes to food standards 2004. http://www.food.gov.uk/mulitmedia/pdfs/casuk04.pdf (accessed May 2005).
6. Bubela TM & Caulfield TA (2004) Do the print media 'hype' genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. CMAJ 170, 1399-1407.
7. Henderson L, Kitzinger J & Green J (2000) Representing infant feeding: content analysis of British media portrayals of bottle feeding and breast feeding. BMJ 321, 1196-1198.
8. Philo G, Secker J, Platt S, Henderson L, McLaughlin G & Burnside J (1994) The impact of the mass media on public images of mental illness: media content and audience belief. Health Educ J 53, 271-281.
9. Stryker JE (2002) Reporting medical information: effects of press releases and newsworthiness on medical journal articles' visibility in the news media. Prev Med 35, 519-530.
10. McBean LD (2001) Good science: its role in setting the record straight. Dairy Council Digest 72(5), 25-30.
11. Wellman NS, Scarbrough FE, Ziegler RG & Lyle B (1999) Do we facilitate the scientific press and the development of dietary guidance when findings from single studies are published? An American Society for Nutritional Sciences Controversy Session Report. Am J Clin Nutr 70, 802-805.
12. International Food Information Council Foundation & Institute of Food Technologists (2005) Guidelines for communicating the emerging science of dietary components for health. http://ific.org/nutrition/functional/guidelines/ upload/FFGuidelnsBro.pdf (accessed May 2005).
13. Social Issues Research Centre, The Royal Society & The Royal Institute of Great Britain (2001) Guidelines on science and health communication. http://www.sirc.org/publik/revised_guidelines.shtml (accessed February 2005).
14. Borra ST, Earl R & Hogan EH (1998) Paucity of nutrition and food safety 'news you can use' reveals opportunity for dietetics practitioners. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 190-193.
15. Sihota S & Lennard L (2004) Health Literacy: Being Able to Make the Most of Health. London: National Consumer Council.
16. Albery IP (2004) Social psychology. In Complete Psychology pp. 362-449 [G Davey, editor]. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
17. Reah D (2002) The Language of Newspapers, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
18. Patterson RE, Satia JA, Kristal AR, Neuhouser ML & Drewnowski A (2001) Is there a consumer backlash against the diet and health message? J Am Diet Assoc 101, 37-41.
19. Ward SJA (2005) Journalism ethics from the public's point of view. Journalism Stud 6, 315-330.
20. Frewer LJ, Scholderer J & Bredahl L (2003) Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of the trust. Risk Anal 23, 1117-1132.
21. Russell G (1999) Essential Psychology for Nurses and Other Health Professionals. London: Routledge.
22. Goldberg JP (1997) Nutrition research in the media: the challenge facing scientists. J Am Coll Nutr 16, 544-550.
23. Harvard School of Public Health & International Food Information Council Foundation (1998) Improving public understanding: guidelines for communicating emerging science on nutrition, food safety and health. J Natl Cancer Inst 90, 194-199.
24. Hackman EM & Moe GL (1999) Evaluation of newspaper reports of nutrition-related research. J Am Diet Assoc 99, 1564-1566.
25. Gibbs A (1997) Focus groups. Social Research Update. http://www.soc. surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU19.html (accessed July 2005).
26. Morgan DL (1998) The Focus Group Guidebook. Focus Group Kit 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Krueger RA & Casey MA (2002) Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Bell E & Alden C (2003) Media Directory 2004. London: Guardian Books.
29. Duffy B, Rowden L (2005) You are what you read? How newspaper readership is related to views. http://www.mori.com/polls/2004/newspaper-readership.shtml (accessed June 2005).
30. Litosseliti L (2003) Using Focus Groups in Research. London: Continuum.
31. Keeble R (2001) Ethics for Journalists. London: Routledge.
32. Condit C (2004) Science reporting to the public: does the message get twisted? CMAJ 170, 1415-1416.
33. Entwistle V (1995) Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers. BMJ 310, 920-923.
34. Woloshin S & Schwartz LM (2002) Press releases translating research into news. JAMA 287, 2856-2858.
35. Whitehead D (2000) Using mass media within health-promoting practice: a nursing perspective. J Adv Nurs 32, 807-816.