Spatial autocorrelation patterns of the modis vegetation indices for the cerrado biome;Padrões de autocorrelação espacial de índices de vegetação modis no bioma Cerrado

Revista Arvore

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 279-290

  De Carvalho, Fábio Martins Vilar ^a,c   Ferreira, Laerte G ^b   Lobo, Fabio C ^b   Diniz Filho, José Alexandre Felizola ^c   Bini, Luís Maurício ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b UFG

^c UFG

Author keywords

MODIS vegetation indices; Spatial autocorrelation and Cerrado

Indexed keywords

EID: 53049107738     PISSN: 01006762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-67622008000200011     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. CALEGARIO, N. et al. Eucalyptus stand growth estimate based on multilevel linear mixed-effects models. Revista Árvore, v.29, n.2, p.251-264, 2005.
2. DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F.; SANT'ANA, C. E. R. Macroecological analysis of South American owls (Strigiformes) using phylogenetic independent contrasts. Journal of Comparative Biology, v.3, n.1, p.27-32, 1998.
3. DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F.; BINI, L. M.; HAWKINS, B. A. Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v.12, n.1, p.53-64, 2003.
4. DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F. et al. Conservation biogeography of anurans in Brazilian Cerrado. Biodiversity and Conservation, v.16, n.4, p.997-1008, 2007.
5. FERREIRA, L. G. et al. Seasonal landscape and spectral vegetation index dynamics in the Brazilian Cerrado: An analysis within the Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazônia (LBA). Remote Sensing of Environment, v.87, n.4, p.534-550, 2003.
6. FERREIRA, L. G.; HUETE, A. R. Assessing the seasonal dynamics of the Brazilian Cerrado vegetation through the use of spatial vegetation indices. International Journal of Remote Sensing, v.25, n.10, p.1837-1860, 2004.
7. FERREIRA, L. G. et al. Optical characterization of the Brazilian Savanna physiognomies for improved land cover monitoring of the cerrado biome: Preliminary assessments from an airborne campaign over an LBA core site. Journal of Arid Environments, v.56, n.3, p.425-447, 2004.
8. FERREIRA, N. C. et al. An operational deforestation mapping system using MODIS data and spatial context analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006a (in press).
9. FERREIRA, M. E. et al. Análise da sazonalidade de paisagens antrópicas e nativas do bioma Cerrado através dos produtos MODIS índices de vegetação, área foliar e atividade fotossintética. Revista Brasileira de Geofísica. 2006b (in press).
10. GAO, X. et al. Optical-biophysical relationships of vegetation spectra without background contamination. Remote Sensing of Environment, v.74, n.3, p.609-620, 2000.
11. GENTRY, A. H.; EMMONS, L. H. Geographical variation in fertility, phenology, and composition of the understory of Neotropical forests. Biotropica, v.19, n.3, p.216-227, 1987.
12. GOMES, M. P.; SANO, E. E.; FERREIRA, L. G. Desmatamento no Estado de Goiás: possibilidades de monitoramento com sensores orbitais de resolução espacial moderada. Revista Brasileira de Geofísica. 2006 (in press).
13. GOWARD, S. N. et al. Normalized difference vegetation index measurements from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer. Remote Sensing of Environment, v.35, n.2-3, p.257-277, 1991.
14. HAWKINS, B. A.; DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F.; SOELLER, S. A. Water links the historical and contemporary components of Australian bird diversity gradient. Journal of Biogeography, v.32, n.6, p.1035-1042, 2005.
15. HAWKINS, B. A. et al. Red herrings revisited: spatial autocorrelation and parameter estimation in geographical ecology. Ecography, v.30, n.3, p.375-384, 2007.
16. HUETE, A. R. et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, v.83, n.1-2, p.195-213, 2002.
17. HUETE, A. R. et al. A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOSMODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, v.59, n.3, p.440-451, 1997.
18. HURLBERT, A. H.; HASKELL, J. P. The effect of energy and seasonality on avian species richness and community composition. The American Naturalist, v.161, n.1, p.83-97, 2003.
19. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA - IBGE. Mapa de biomas do Brasil. 2004.
20. JACKSON, R. D.; HUETE, A. R. Interpreting vegetation indices. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, v.11, n.3-4, p.185-200, 1991.
21. JUSTICE, C. O. et al. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS): Land remote sensing for global change research. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, v.36, p.1-22, 1998.
22. KERKHOFF, A. J. et al. Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature-dependence of primary productivity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v.14, n.6, p.585-598, 2005.
23. KERR, J. T.; OSTROVSKY, M. From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, v.18, n.6, p.299-305, 2003.
24. KOY, K. et al. Percentage canopy cover - using Landsat imagery to delineate habitat for Myanmar's endangered Eld's deer (Cervus eldi). Animal Conservation, v.8, n.3, p.289-296, 2005.
25. LACERDA, C. M. B.; KAGEYAMA, P. Y. Spatial genotype structure of two natural populations of Myracrodruon urundeuva M. Allemão in a semiarid region of Brazil. Revista Árvore, v.27, n.2, p.145-150, 2003.
26. LEGENDRE, P.; FORTIN, M.-J. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio, v.80, n.2, p.107-138, 1989.
27. LEGENDRE, P. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, v.74, n.6, p.1659-1673, 1993.
28. LENNON, J. J. Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology. Ecography, v.23, n.1, p.101-113, 2000.
29. LIU, H. Q.; HUETE, A. A feedback based modification of the NDVI to minimize canopy background and atmospheric noise. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, v.33, n.2, p.457-465, 1995.
30. MOODY, A.; STRAHLER, A. H. Characteristics of composited AVHRR data and problems in their classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, v.15, n.17, p.3473-3491, 1994.
31. MIURA, T. et al. Vegetation detection through smoke-filled AVIRIS images: An assessment using MODIS bandpasses. Journal of Geophysical Research, v.103, n.D24, p.32.001-32.012, 1998.
32. MIURA, T. et al. An error and sensitivity analysis of atmospheric resistant vegetation indices derived from dark target-based atmospheric correction, Remote Sensing of Environment, v.78, n.3, p.284-298, 2001.
33. RATANA, P.; HUETE, A.; FERREIRA, L. G. Analysis of Cerrado physiognomies and conversion in the MODIS seasonal-temporal domain. Earth Interactions, v.9, n.3, p.1-22, 2005.
34. RANGEL, T. F. L. V. B.; DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. F.; BINI, L. M. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v.15, n.4, p.321-327, 2006.
35. RODRIGUEZ, M. A.; LOPEZ-SAÑUDO, I. L.; HAWKINS, B. A. The geographic distribution of mammal body size in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v.15, n.2, p.173-181, 2006.
36. ROSSI, J.-P.; QUÉNÉHERVÉ, P. Relating species density to environmental variables in presence of spatial autocorrelation: a study case on soil nematodes distribution. Ecography, v.21, n.2, p.117-123, 1998.
37. RUGGIERO, A.; KITZBERGER, T. Environmental correlates of mammal species richness in South America: Effects of spatial structure, taxonomy and geographic range. Ecography, v.27, n.4, p.401-416, 2004.
38. SELMI, S.; BOULINIER, T. Ecological biogeography of Southern Ocean Islands: The importance of considering spatial issues. The American Naturalist, v.158, n.4, p.426-437, 2001.
39. TOGNELLI, M. F.; KELT, D. A. Analysis of determinants of mammalian species richness in South America using spatial autoregressive models. Ecography, v.27, n.4, p.427-436, 2004.
40. WANG, Z. X.; LIU, C.; HUETE, A. From AVHRR-NDVI to MODIS-EVI: Advances in vegetation index research. Acta Ecologica Sinica, v.23, n.5, p.979-988, 2003.
41. WESSELS, K. J. et al. Mapping regional land cover with MODIS data for biological conservation: Examples from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA and Pará State, Brazil. Remote Sensing of Environment, v.92, n.1, p.67-83, 2004.