Relating species density to environmental variables in presence of spatial autocorrelation: A study case on soil nematodes distribution

Ecography

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 117-123

  Rossi, Jean Pierre ^a   Quénéhervé, Patrick ^b  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

^b Lab de Nematologie ORSTOM INRA   (Martinique)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENSITY; SOIL NEMATODE; SOIL PROPERTY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

HELICOTYLENCHUS; HELICOTYLENCHUS RETUSUS; NEMATODA;

EID: 0344110531     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00665.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Campbell, C. L. and Noe, J. P. 1985. The spatial analysis of soilborne pathogens and root diseases. - Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 23: 129-148.
2. Cliff, A. D. and Ord, J. K. 1981. Spatial processes: models and applications. - Pion, London.
3. Delaville, L., Rossi, J. P. and Quénéhervé, P. 1996. Plant row and soil factors influencing the microspatial patterns of plant-parasitic nematodes on sugarcane in Martinique. -Fund. Appl. Nematol. 19: 321-328.
4. Elliot, E. T. and Coleman, D. C. 1988. Let the soil work for us. - Ecol. Bull. 39: 23-32.
5. _ , Coleman, D. C., Ingham, R. E. and Trofymov, J. A. 1984. Carbon and energy flow through microflora and microfauna in the soil subsystems of terrestrial ecosystems, - In: Klug, M. J. and Reddy, C. A. (eds), Current perspectives in microbial ecology. American Soc. of Microbiology, Washington, pp. 424-433.
6. Ferris, H., Mullens, T. A. and Foord, K. E. 1990. Stability and characteristics of spatial description parameters for nematode populations. - J. Nematol. 22: 427-439.
7. Fortin, M. J. and Gurevitch, J. 1993. Mantel tests: spatial structure in field experiments. - In: Scheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J. (eds), Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, pp. 342-359.
8. Freckman, D. W. 1988. Bacterivorous nematodes and Organic-matter decomposition. - Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 24: 195-217.
9. Goodey, J. B. 1957. Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. - Techn. Bull. 2, Min. of Agr., Fish. and Food, London.
10. Koenning, S. R., Walters, S. A. and Barker, K. R. 1996. Impact of soil texture on the reproductive and damage potentials of Rotylenchulus reniformis and Meloidogyne incognita on cotton. - J. Nematol. 28: 527-536.
11. Legendre, L. and Legendre, P. 1984. Ecologie numérique Tome 2: la structure des données écologiques. - Masson et les Presses de l'Université du Québec, Paris.
12. Legendre, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? - Ecology 74: 1659-1673.
13. _ and Troussellier, M. 1988. Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria: modeling in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. -Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 1055-1067.
14. _ and Fortin, M. J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. - Vegetatio 80: 107-138.
15. _ and Vaudor, A. 1991. The R Package: multidimensional analysis, spatial analysis. - Dépt des Sci. Biol., Univ. de Montréal, Montréal.
16. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. - Cancer Res. 27: 209-220.
17. Moran, P. A. P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. - Biometrika 37: 17-23.
18. Oden, N. L. 1984. Assessing the significance of spatial correlograms. Geogr. Anal. 16: 1-16.
19. Quénéhervé, P. and Chotte, J. L. 1996. Distribution of nematodes in vertisol aggregates under a permanent pasture in Martinique. - Appl. Soil Ecol. 4: 193-200.
20. Robertson, G. P. 1994. The impact of soil and crop management practices on soil spatial heterogeneity. - In: Pankhurst, C. E., Doube, B. M., Gupta, V. V. S. R. and Grace, P. R. (eds), Soil biota. Management in sustainable farming systems. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 156-161.
21. _ and Freckman, D. 1995. The spatial distribution of nematode trophic groups across a cultivated ecosystem. -Ecology 76: 1425-1432.
22. Rossi, J. P., Delaville, L. and Quénéhervé, P. 1996. Microspatial structure of a plant-parasitic nematode community in a sugarcane field in Martinique. - Appl. Soil Ecol. 3: 17-26.
23. Seinhorst, J. W. 1950. De betekenis van de toestand van de grond voor het optreden van aanstasting door net stengelaaltje (Ditylenchus dipsaci) Khün Filipjev. - Tidschr. Pl. Ziekt. 56: 292-349.
24. _ 1962. Modifications of the elutriation method for extracting nematodes from soil. - Nematologica 8: 117-128.
25. Smouse, P. E., Long, J. C. and Sokal, R. R. 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. - Syst. Zool. 35: 627-632.
26. Sokal, R. R. and Oden, N. L. 1978. Spatial autocorrelation in bioloay. I. Methodology. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10: 199-228.
27. _ and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. - W. H. Freeman.
28. Southey, J. F. 1986. Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes reference book. - Min. of Agricult., Fish, and Food, 402, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.
29. Starr, J. L., Heald, C. M., Robinson, A. F., Smith, R. G. and Krausz, J. P. 1993. Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis and associated soil textures from some cotton production areas of Texas. - J. Nematol. 25: 895-899.
30. Wallace, M. K. and Hawkins, D. M. 1994. Applications of geostatistics in plant nematology. - J. Nematol. 26: 626-634.
31. _ , Rust, R. H., Hawkins, D. M. and MacDonald, D. H. 1993. Correlation of edaphic factors with plant-parasitic nematode population densities in a forage field. - J. Nematol. 25: 642-653.
32. Webster, R. 1985. Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in the field. - Adv. Soil Sci. 3: 2-70.
33. _ and Oliver, M. A. 1990. Statistical methods in soil and land resource survey. - Oxford Univ. Press.
34. Yeates, G. W. 1979. Soil nematodes in terrestrial ecosystems. - J. Nematol. 11: 213-229.