Towards attention-centered interfaces: An aesthetic evaluation of perspective with eye tracking

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Franke, Ingmar S ^a   Pannasch, Sebastian ^a   Helmert, Jens R ^a   Rieger, Robert ^a   Groh, Rainer ^a   Velichkovsky, Boris M ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Eye tracking; Perspective projection; Scene perception; Subjective evaluation

Indexed keywords

CAMERA OBSCURA; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN USERS; MULTI-PERSPECTIVE; PERSPECTIVE PROJECTION; SCENE PERCEPTION; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE; TWO-DIMENSIONAL SURFACES;

CAMERAS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INFORMATION THEORY; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

TWO DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 52949143798     PISSN: 15516857     EISSN: 15516865     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1386109.1386111     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AGRAWALA, M., ZORIN,D., ANDMUNZNER, T. 2000. Artistic multiprojection rendering. In Proceedings of the EurographicsWorkshop on Rendering Techniques 2000 (London, UK). Springer-Verlag, New York, 125-136.
2. ANGEL, E. 1997. Interactive Computer Graphics-A top-down approach with OpenGL. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. ARNHEIM, R. 1998. The Power of Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual Arts. The Regents of the University of California, Berkeley, CA.
4. DODGE, R. 1900. Visual perception during eye movement. Psych. Rev. 7, 454-465.
5. EDGERTON, S. Y. 1975. The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. Basic Books, New York, NY.
6. FINDLAY, J. M. AND GILCHRIST, I. D. 2003. Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
7. FOLEY, J. D. 1999. Computer Graphics-Principles and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
8. FRANKE, I. S., RIEGER, R., AND ZAVESKY,M. 2005. The power of frustum. Neue Medien in der Informationsgesellschaft 2, 309-317.
9. FRANKE, I. S., ZAVESKY, M., AND DACHSELT, R. 2007. Learning from painting: Perspective-dependent geometry deformation for perceptual realism. In IPT-EGVE Symposium. IPT-EGVE, 117-120.
10. GROH, R. 2000. Romanik interaktiv. In Vom Realismus der Bilder. Interdisziplinaere Forschungen zur Syntax bildlicher Darstellungsformen, K. Sachs-Hombach and K. Rehkaemper, Eds. Scriptum Verlag, Magdeburg, Germany.
11. GROH, R. 2005. Das Interaktionsbild-Theorie und Methodik der Interfacegestaltung. TUDpress, Dresden, Germany.
12. GROH, R., FRANKE, I. S., AND ZAVESKY, M. 2006. With a painter's eye: An approach to an intelligent camera. In The Virtual. Stockholm, Sweden.
13. ITTI, L., KOCH, C., AND NIEBUR, E. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 11, 1254-1259.
14. JOKELA, T., IIVARI, N., MATERO, J., AND KARUKKA, M. 2003. The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: Analyzing iso 13407 against iso 9241-11. In CLIHC '03: Proceedings of the Latin American Conference on HumanComputer Interaction. ACM, New York, 53-60.
15. KLOTZ, H. 1990. Filippo Brunelleschi: The Early Works and the Medieval Tradition. Rizzoli Intl Pubns, Stuttgart, Germany.
16. KOENDERINK, J. J. AND VAN DOORN, A. J. 2003. Pictorial space. In Looking into Pictures: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Pictorial Space, R. S. H. Hecht and M. Atherton, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. LEVOY, M. AND WHITAKER, R. 1990. Gaze-directed volume rendering. In SI3D '90: Proceedings of the 1990 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics. ACM, New York, 217-223.
18. PALMER, S. E. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. PUOLAMAEKI, K., SALOJAERVI, J., SAVIA, E., SIMOLA, J., AND KASKI, S. 2005. Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval. In SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, 146-153.
20. RADEMACHER, P. AND BISHOP, G. 1998. Multiple-center-of-projection images. In SIGGRAPH '98: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. ACM, New York, 199-206.
21. RAUBER, T. 1993. Algorithmen in der Computergrafik. B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany.
22. ROMAN, A., GARG, G., AND LEVOY, M. 2004. Interactive design of multi-perspective images for visualizing urban landscapes. In VIS '04: Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization '04 (Washington, DC). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 537-544.
23. TORRALBA, A., OLIVA, A., CASTELHANO, M. S., AND HENDERSON, J. M. 2006. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psych. Rev. 113, 4, 766-786.
24. VELICHKOVSKY, B. M. 2002. Heterarchy of cognition: The depths and the highs of a framework for memory research. Memory 10, 5-6, 405-419.
25. VELICHKOVSKY, B. M. AND HANSEN, J. P. 1996. New technological windows into mind: There is more in eyes and brains for human-computer interaction. In CHI '96: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 496-503.
26. VON HELMHOLTZ, H. 1867. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Voss, Leipzig, Germany.
27. WATT, A. 1993. 3D Computer Graphics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
28. YU, J. ANDMCMILLAN, L. 2004. A framework for multiperspective rendering. In Proceedings of the 15th Eurographics Symposium on Rendering (EGSR04). The Eurographics Association, 61-68.
29. ZOMET, A., FELDMAN, D., PELEG, S., AND WEINSHALL, D. 2003. Mosaicing new views: The crossed-slits projection. In IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 25, 6, 741-754.
30. ZORIN, D. AND BARR, A. H. 1995. Correction of geometric perceptual distortions in pictures. In SIGGRAPH '95: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. ACM, New York, 257-264.