An assessment of the use of remote sensing to map habitat features important to sustaining lamprey populations

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 807-818

  Gilvear, D J ^a   Sutherland, P ^a   Higgins, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Channel morphology; Instream habitat; Remote sensing; River lamprey

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ASSESSMENT METHOD; CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ELECTROFISHING; FISH; GIS; HABITAT QUALITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAPPING METHOD; NATURE CONSERVATION; POPULATION DENSITY; REMOTE SENSING; RIVER SYSTEM; THEMATIC MAPPING;

LAMPETRA AYRESII; LAMPETRA FLUVIATILIS; PETROMYZONTIDAE;

EID: 52749090789     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: 10990755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.876     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. APEM. 2001. Assessing sea lamprey distribution and abundance in the River Spey: Phase 2. An assessment of gradient as a tool for lamprey habitat identification. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report, SNH, Edinburgh.
2. APEM. 2002. Assessment of sea lamprey distribution and abundance in the River Spey: Phase II. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report F01AC608, SNH, Edinburgh.
3. Bierwirth PN, Lee TJ, Burne RV. 1993. Shallow sea-floor reflectance and water depth derived by unmixing multispectral imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59: 331-338.
4. Bryant RG, Gilvear DJ. 1999. Quantifying geomorphic and riparian land cover changes either side of a large flood event using airborne remote sensing; River Tay, Scotland, Geomorphology 23: 1-17.
5. Dierson HM, Zimmermann RC, Leatherss RA, Downes TV, Davis CO. 2003. Ocean colour remote sensing of seagrass and bathymetry in the Bahamas Banks by high resolution airborne imagery. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 444-455.
6. Gardiner R, Taylor, R. Armstrong J. 1995. Habitat assessment and survey of lamprey populations occurring in areas of conservation interest. Fisheries Research Services Report no. 4/95, Freshwater Fisheries Laboratory, Pitlochry.
7. Gilvear DJ, Bryant R. 2003. Aerial photography and other remotely sensed data. In Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, Kondolf M, Piegey H (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 211-247.
8. Gilvear DJ, Waters TM, Milner AM. 1995. Image analysis of aerial photography to quantify changes in channel morphology and instream habitat following placer mining in interior Alaska. Freshwater Biology 34: 389-398.
9. Gilvear DJ, Bryant R, Hardy T. 1999. Remote sensing of channel morphology and instream fluvial processes. Progress in Environmental Science 1: 257-284.
10. Gilvear DJ, Davids C, Tyler AN. 2004. The use of remotely sensed data to detect channel hydromorphology; River Tummel, Scotland. River Research and Applications 20: 795-811.
11. Gilvear DJ, Hunter P, Higgins T. In press. An experimental approach towards quantifying the effect of water depth and substrate type on river reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing.
12. Harvey J, Cowx I. 2002. A standardised survey and monitoring protocol for the assessment of lamprey populations in SAC rivers in the UK. Report to the Life in UK Rivers Project, English Nature, Peterborough.
13. Hedger RD, Dodson JJ, Bourque JF, Bergeron NE, Carbonneau PE. In press. Improving models of juvenile Atlantic Salmon use through high resolution remote sensing, Ecological Modelling.
14. Hedley JD, Mumby PJ. 2003. A remote sensing method for resolving depth and sub-pixel composition of aquatic benthos. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 480-488.
15. Karpouzli E, Malthus T, Place CJ, Mitchell Chui A, Ines Garcia M, Mair JD. 2003. Underwater light characterisation for correction of remotely sensed images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 2683-2702.
16. Karpouzli E, Malthus T, Place CJ. 2004. Hyperspectral discrimination of coral reef benthic communities in the western Caribbean. Coral Reefs 23: 141-151.
17. Leckie DG, Cloney E, Jay C, Paradine D. 2005. Automated mapping of stream features with high-resolution multispectral imagery: an example of the capabilities. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 71: 145-155.
18. Lee Z, Carder KL, Mobley CD, Steward RG, Patch JS, 1999. Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters: 2. Deriving bottom depths and water properties by optimisation. Applied Optics 38: 3831-3843.
19. Legleiter CJ. 2003. Spectrally driven classification of high spatial resolution, hyperspectral imagery: a tool for mapping instream habitat. Environmental Management 32: 399-411.
20. Legleiter C. Marcus WA, Lawrence R. 2002. Effects of sensor resolution on mapping instream habitats. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68: 801-807.
21. Legleiter CJ, Roberts DA. 2005. Effects of channel morphology and sensor spatial resolution on image-derived depth estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment 95: 231-247.
22. Legleiter CJ, Roberts DA, Marcus WA. Fonstad MA. 2004. Passive optical remote sensing of river channel morphology and in-stream habitat: Physical basis and feasibility. Remote Sensing of Environment 93: 493-510.
23. Lunetta RS, Cosentino BL, Montgomery DR, Beamer EM, Beechie TJ. 1997. GIS-based evaluation of salmon habitat in the Pacific Northwest, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63: 1219-1229.
24. Lyzenga DR. 1981. Remote sensing of bottom reflectance and water attenuation parameters in shallow water using aircraft and LANDSAT data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2: 71-82.
25. Maitland PS. 2003. Ecological requirements of river, brook and sea lampreys. Report to Life in UK Rivers Project, English Nature, Peterborough.
26. Maitland PS, Lyle A. 2000. The distribution of river lamprey on the River Teith. Report to Life in UK Rivers Project, English Nature, Peterborough.
27. Malthus T, Karpouzli E. 2003. Integrating field and high spatial resolution satellite based methods for monitoring shallow submersed aquatic habitats in the Sound of Eriskay, Scotland, UK. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 2585-2815.
28. Marcus WA. 2002. Mapping of instream microhabitats with high spatial resolution hyperspectral imagery. Journal of Geographical Systems 4: 113-126.
29. Marcus WA, Legleiter CJ, Aspinall R, Boardman J, Crabtree R. 2003. High spatial resolution, hyperspectral (HSRH) mapping of instream habitats, depths, and woody debris in mountain streams. Geomorphology 55: 363-380.
30. McEwan L, Gardiner J. 2001. Impact of gravel extraction on river lamprey, brook lamprey and salmon on the Endrick Water cSAC. Report no BAT/LG19/00/01/54, SNH, Edinburgh.
31. Milton EJ, Gilvear DJ, Hooper ID. 1995. Investigating change in fluvial systems using remotely sensed data. In Changing River Channels, Gurnell A, Petts G (eds). John Wiley: Chichester; 276-301.
32. Mobley CD, Sundman LK. 2003. Effects of optically shallow bottoms on upwelling radiances: inhomogeneous and sloping bottoms. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 329-336.
33. Peustow TM, Simms EL, Simms A, Butler K. 2001. Mapping of salmon habitat parameters using airborne imagery and digital ancillary data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 309-317.
34. Roberts ACB, Anderson JM. 1999. Shallow water bathymetry using integrated airborne multispectral remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: 497-510.
35. Splayt T, Ferrier G, Lawrence A, Anderson K. 2003. Fourth derivative analysis of coral reef substrate spectra. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 3867-3872.
36. Stumpf RP, Holderied K, Sinclair M. 2003. Determination of water depth with high resolution satellite imagery over variable bottom depths. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 547-556.
37. Tolk BL, Han L, Rundquist DC. 2002. The impact of bottom brightness on spectral reflectance of suspended sediments. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 2259-2268.
38. Winterbottom SJ, Gilvear DJ. 1997. Quantification of channel bed morphology in gravel-bed rivers using airborne multispectral imagery and aerial photography. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13: 489-499.
39. Whited D, Stanford JA, Kimball JS. 2002. Application of airborne multispectral imagery to quantify riverine habitats at different base flows. River Research and Applications 18: 583-594.
40. Wright A, Marcus WA, Aspinall R. 2000. Evaluation of multispectral, fine scale digital imagery as a tool for mapping stream morphology. Geomorphology 33: 107-120.
41. Zandveld JR, Boss E. 2003. The influence of bottom morphology on reflectance: theory and two-dimensional geometry model. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 374-379.