Spectrally Driven Classification of High Spatial Resolution, Hyperspectral Imagery: A Tool for Mapping In-Stream Habitat

Environmental Management

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 399-411

  Legleiter, Carl J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Hyperspectral imagery; In stream habitat; Remote sensing; River

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; INFRARED RADIATION; MAPPING; REMOTE SENSING;

FLUVIAL SYSTEMS; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

CLASSIFICATION; MAPPING; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; STREAM;

ARTICLE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HABITAT QUALITY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; RIVER; RIVER ECOSYSTEM; UNITED STATES;

ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LIGHT; RIVERS;

LAMAR RIVER; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WYOMING;

EID: 0345689452     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-0034-1     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alabyan, A. M., and R. S. Chalov. 1998. Types of river channel patterns and their natural controls. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23:467-474.
2. Bisson, P. A., J. L. Nielsen, R. A. Palmason, and L. E. Grove. 1982. A system of naming habitat types in small streams, with examples of habitat utilization by salmonids during low streamflow. Pages 62-73 in N. A. Armatrout Eds, Acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inventory information. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
3. Boon, P. J. 1992. Essential elements in the case for river conservation. Pages 11-33 in P.J. Boon, P. Calow, and G. E. Petts. Eds, River conservation and management. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
4. Bukata, R. P., J. H. Jerome, K. Y. Kondratyev, and D. V. Pozdnyakov. 1995. Optical properties and remote sensing of inland and coastal waters. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida 362.
5. Burrough, P. A. 1996. Natural objects with indeterminate boundaries. Pages 3-28 in P. A. Burrough, and A. U. Frank. Eds, Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries. Taylor and Francis, Bristol, Pennsylvania.
6. Everitt, B. S., and G. Dunn. 1991. Applied multivariate data analysis. Halsted Press, New York 304.
7. Fisher, R. A. 1936. The use of multiple measurements on taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 7:179-188.
8. Frank, A. U. 1996. The prevalence of objects with sharp boundaries in GIS. Pages 29-40 in P. A. Burrough, and A. U. Frank. Eds, Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries. Taylor and Francis, Bristol, Pennsylvania.
9. Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren, and M. D. Hurley. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10:199-214.
10. Gilvear, D. J., and S. J. Winterbottom. 1992. Channel change and flood events since 1783 on the regulated River Tay, Scotland: implications for flood hazard management. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 7:247-260.
11. Gilvear, D. J., T. M. Waters, and A. M. Milner. 1995. Image analysis of aerial photography to quantify changes in channel morphology and in-stream habitat following placer mining in interior Alaska. Freshwater Biology 34:389-398.
12. Goodwin, C. N. 1999. Fluvial classification: Neanderthal necessity or needless normalcy. Pages 229-236 in D. S. Olson, and J. P. Potyondy. Eds, Wildland hydrology. American Water Resources Association, Middleburg, Virginia.
13. Hardy, T. B., P. C. Anderson, M. U. Neale, and D. K. Stevens. 1994. Applications of multispectral videography for the delineation of riverine depths and mesoscale hydraulic features. Pages 445-454 in R. Marston, and V. Hasfurther. Eds, Effects of human-induced change on hydrologic systems. American Water Resources Association, Bethesda, Maryland.
14. Hawkins, C. P., J. L. Kershner, P. A. Bisson, M. D. Bryant, L. M. Decker, S. V. Gregory, D. A. McCullough, C. K. Overton, G. H. Reeves, R. J. Steedman, and M. K. Young. 1993. A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features. Fisheries 18:3-12.
15. Hynes, H. B. N. 1975. The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereininung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 19:1-15.
16. Jensen, J. R. 1996. Digital image processing. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 316.
17. Karr, J. R., and I. J. Schlosser. 1978. Water resources and the land-water interface. Science 201:229-234.
18. Kohler, H. 1994. Statistics for business and economics. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York 1043.
19. Ladd, S. C., W. A. Marcus, and S. Cherry. 1998. Differences in trace metal concentrations among fluvial morphologic units and implications for sampling. Environmental Geology 36:259-270.
20. Legleiter, C. J., W. A. Marcus, and R. L. Lawrence. 2002. Effects of sensor resolution on mapping in-stream habitats. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68:801-807.
21. Lyon, J. G., R. S. Lunetta, and D. C. Williams. 1992. Airborne multispectral scanner data for evaluating bottom sediment types and water depths of the St. Mary's River, Michigan. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58:951-956.
22. Lyzenga, D. R. 1981. Remote sensing of bottom reflectance and water attenuation parameters in shallow water using aircraft and landsat data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2:71-82.
23. Marcus, W. A. 2002. Mapping of stream microhabitats with high spatial resolution hyperspectral imagery. Journal of Geographical Systems 4:113-126.
24. Marcus, W. A., C. J. Legleiter, R. Aspinall, J. W. Boardman, and R. Crabtree (2003) High spatial resolution, hyperspectral (HSRH) mapping of in-stream habitats, depths, and woody debris in mountain streams. Geomorphology 55:363-380.
25. Maritorena, S. 1996. Remote sensing of the water attenuation in coral reefs: a case study in French Polynesia. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17:155-166.
26. Mertes, L. A. K. 2002. Remote sensing of riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47:799-816.
27. Meyer, G. A., S. G. Wells, and A. J. T. Jull. 1995. Fire and alluvial chronology in Yellowstone National Park: climatic and intrinsic controls on Holocene geomorphic processes. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 107:1211-1230.
28. Milton, E.J., D. J. Gilvear, and I. Hooper. 1995. Investigating change in fluvial systems using remotely sensed data. Pages 277-299 in A. Gurnell, and G. Petts. Eds, Changing river channels. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
29. Minshall, G. W., C. T. Robinson, and D. E. Lawrence. 1997. Postfire responses of lotic ecosystems in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:2509-2525.
30. Montgomery, D. R., and J. M. Buffington. 1997. Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. The Geological Society of America Bulletin 109:596-612.
31. Moody, J. A., and D. A. Martin. 2001. Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26:1049-1070.
32. Muller, E., H. Decamps, and M. K. Dobson. 1993. Contribution of space remote sensing to river studies. Freshwater Biology 29:301-312.
33. Philpot, W. D. 1989. Bathymetric mapping with passive multispectral imagery. Applied Optics 28:1569-1578.
34. Pierce, K. L. (1979) History and dynamics of glaciation in the northern Yellowstone National Park area. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 729-F. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 90 pp.
35. Poole, G. C., C. A. Frissell, and S. C. Ralph. 1997. In-stream habitat unit classification: inadequacies for monitoring and some consequences for management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33:879-896.
36. Price, J. C. 1997. Spectral band selection for visible-near infrared remote sensing: spectral-spatial resolution tradeoffs. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35:1277-1299.
37. Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
38. Schott, J. R. 1997. Remote sensing: the image chain approach. Oxford University Press, New York 394.
39. Schumann, R. R. 1989. Morphology of Red Creek, Wyoming, an arid-region anastomosing channel system. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 14:277-288.
40. Smith, L. C. 1997. Satellite remote sensing of river inundation area, stage, and discharge: a review. Hydrological Processes 11:1427-1439.
41. Swayze, G. A., R. N. Clark, R. M. Pearson, and K. E. Livo (1996) Mapping acid-generating minerals at the California Gulch Superfund Site in Leadville, Colorado using imaging spectroscopy. Pages 231-234 in Summaries of the sixth annual JPL airborne earth science workshop, volume 1. AVIRIS Workshop, Pasadena, California, 4-8 March 1996.
42. Ward, J. V. 1989. The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8:2-8.
43. Water Science and Technology, Board. 2002. Riparian areas: functions and strategies for management. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 436.
44. Westaway, R. M., S. N. Lane, and D. M. Hicks. 2001. Remote sensing of clear-water, shallow, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67:1271-1281.
45. Whiting, P. J., and J. B. Bradley. 1993. A process-based classification system for headwater streams. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 18:603-612.
46. Williams, G.P. 1978. The case of the shrinking channels - the North Platte and Platte Rivers in Nebraska. United States Geological Survey Circular 781. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 48.
47. Winterbottom, S. J., and D. J. Gilvear. 1997. Quantification of channel-bed morphology in gravel-bed rivers using airborne multispectral imagery and aerial photography. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 13:489-499.
48. Wohl, E. 2000. Mountain rivers. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC 320.
49. Wright, A., W. A. Marcus, and R. Aspinall. 2000. Evaluation of multispectral, fine scale digital imagery as a tool for mapping stream morphology. Geomorphology 33:107-120.