Participatory planning and means-ends rationality: A translation problem

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 325-343

  MacCallum, Diana ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discourse analysis; Genre; Participation; Plans; Rationality; Texts

Indexed keywords

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; DEMOCRACY; LOCAL PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING METHOD; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

EID: 52649169031     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649350802277852     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Agar, M. (1985) Institutional discourse. Text, 5:3, pp. 147-168.
2. Albrechts, L. (2005) Creativity as a drive for change. Planning Theory, 4:3, pp. 247-269.
3. Beauregard, R. A. (2005) Introduction: Institutional transformations. Planning Theory, 4:3, pp. 203-207.
4. Black, A. (1968) The Comprehensive Plan. Principles and Practice of Urban Planning, pp. 349-378. International City Managers' Association, Washington DC
5. Blau, P. M. and Meyer, M. W. (1987) Bureaucracy in Modern Society, Random House, New York
6. Bourdieu, P. et al. (1999) The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, Polity, Cambridge
7. Callon, M. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196-233. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
8. Callon, M. (1986) The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, pp. 19-34. MacMillan Press, London
9. Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1981) Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies, pp. 277-303. Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston
10. Cedersund, E. and Saljo, R. (1997) Bureaucratic discourse, conversational space, and the concept of voice. Semiotica, 1:2, pp. 79-101.
11. Chadwick, G. F. (1971) A Systems View of Planning: Toward a Theory of the Urban and Regional Planning Process, Pergamon, Oxford
12. (1997) Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, Cassell, London
13. Coaffee, J. and Healey, P. (2003) "My Voice: My Place": Transforming urban governance. Urban Studies, 40:10, pp. 1979-1999.
14. Eggins, S. (1994) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, Pinter, London
15. Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research, Routledge, London
16. Flyvbjerg, B. (1996) Rommentary: The dark side of planning: rationality and realrationalitat'. Explorations in Planning Theory, pp. 383-394. Centre for Urban Policy Research, New Jersey
17. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
18. Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power, University of California Press, Berkeley
19. Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes, Massachusetts, The MIT Press, Cambridge
20. Hajer, M. A. (2005) Rebuilding ground zero. The politics of performance. Planning Theory and Practice, 6:4, pp. 445-464.
21. Hall, P. (1975) Urban and Regional Planning, Penguin, Harmondsworth
22. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, Edward Arnold, London
23. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective, Deakin University, Geelong
24. Healey, P. (1996) The communicative work of development plans. Explorations in Planning Theory, pp. 263-288. Centre for Urban Policy Research, New Jersey
25. Healey, P. (2003) Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2:2, pp. 101-123.
26. Healey, P. (2004) Creativity and urban governance. Policy Studies, 25:2, pp. 87-102.
27. Healey, P. (2005) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills
28. Healey, P. (2006) Network complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. The Network Society: A New Context for Planning, pp. 146-160. Routledge, London
29. Hillier, J. (2000) Going round the back? Complex networks and informal action in local planning processes. Environment and Planning A, 32:1, pp. 33-54.
30. Hillier, J. (2001) Practical vision, political action? Planners as chameleons or missionaries?, Tongji University, Shanghai
31. Hillier, J. (2002) Mind the gap. Habitus: A Sense of place, pp. 143-172. Ashgate, Perth
32. Hillier, J. (2002) Shadows of Power, Routledge/Taylor and Francis, London
33. Hillier, J. (2003) Puppets of populism?. International Planning Studies, 8:2, pp. 157-166.
34. Hopkins, D. (2004) Deliberative democracy in planning practice: Important departures from theory, September, Perth
35. Iedema, R. (1997) The language of administration: Organizing human activity in formal institutions. Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, pp. 73-100. Cassell, London
36. Iedema, R. (2001) Resemiotization. Semiotica, 137:14, pp. 23-40.
37. Iedema, R. (2003) Multimodality, resemiotisation: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Journal of Visual Communication, 2:1, pp. 29-57.
38. Iedema, R. and Scheeres, H. (2003) From doing work to talking work: Renegotiating knowing, doing, and identity. Applied Linguistics, 24:3, pp. 316-337.
39. Innes, J. E. (1996) Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62:4, pp. 460-472.
40. Innes, J. E. (2004) Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3:1, pp. 5-20.
41. Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. E. (2003) Collaborative policymaking: governance through dialogue. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, pp. 33-59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
42. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes
43. Latour, B. (1990) Drawing things together. Representation in Scientific Practice, pp. 19-68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
44. Law, J. (1999) After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 1-14. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
45. MacCallum, D. (2002) Breaking the Mould without breaking the rules: discursive struggles in a land use planning committee. Undisciplined Thoughts, pp. 199-213. Black Swan Press, Perth
46. MacCallum, D. (2005) Consent and resistance: A case study of participatory decision making. Consent and Consensus, pp. 351-370. API Network, Perth
47. MacCallum, D. (2007) When experts disagree: Discourse dynamics in participatory planning, PhD thesis
48. Marris, P. (2001) On rationality and democracy. International Planning Studies, 6:3, pp. 279-284.
49. Martin, J. R. (1985) Process and text: Two aspects of semiosis. Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 1: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop, pp. 248-274. Benjamins, Amsterdam
50. Martin, J. R. (1992) English Text: System and Structure, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia
51. Martin, J. R. (1997) Analysing genre: Functional parameters. Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, pp. 3-39. Cassell, London
52. McGuirk, P. M. (2001) Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 33:2, pp. 195-217.
53. McLoughlin, J. B. (1969) Urban and Regional Planning: A Systems Approach, Faber and Faber, London
54. Meyerson, M. and Banfield, E. C. (1955) Politics, Planning, and the Public Interest: The Case of Public Housing in Chicago, The Free Press (MacMillan), New York
55. Murdoch, J. and Marsden, T. (1995) The spatialization of politics: Local and national actor-spaces in environmental conflict. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20:3, pp. 368-380.
56. Roberts, M. (1974) An Introduction to Town Planning Techniques, Hutchinson Educational, London
57. Rydin, Y. (1998) The enabling local state and urban development: resources, rhetoric and planning in East London. Urban Studies, 35:2, pp. 175-191.
58. Simon, H. A. (1997) Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organisations, The Free Press, New York
59. Smith, D. E. (1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge, Northeastern University Press, Boston
60. Smith, D. E. (2002) Institutional Ethnography. Qualitative Research in Action, Sage, London
61. Tait, M. (2002) Room for manoeuvre? An actor-network study of central-local relations in development plan making. Planning Theory and Practice, 3:1, pp. 69-85.
62. Tett, A. and Wolf, J. M. (1991) Discourse analysis and city plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 10:3, pp. 195-200.
63. Thomas, H. and Healey, P. (1991) Dilemmas of Planning Practice: Ethics, Legitimacy and the Validation of Knowledge, Avebury Technical Academic Publishing Group [Gower], Aldershot
64. Throgmorton, J. A. (1991) The rhetorics of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 24:1, pp. 153-179.
65. Throgmorton, J. A. (1993) Survey research as rhetorical trope: Electric power planning arguments in Chicago. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, pp. 117-144. University College of London Press, London
66. Throgmorton, J. A. (1996) 'Impeaching' research: Planning as persuasive and consitutive discourse. Explorations in Planning Theory, pp. 345-364. Centre for Urban Policy Research, New Jersey
67. Yiftachel, O. (1994) The dark side of modernism: Planning as control of an ethnic minority. Postmodern Cities and Spaces, Blackwell, Oxford