Differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-up of cancer survivors accrued via self-referral versus cancer registry in the FRESH START diet and exercise trial

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1288-1294

  Snyder, Denise Clutter ^a   Sloane, Richard ^b   Lobach, David ^a   Lipkus, Isaac M ^a,c   Peterson, Bercedis ^c   Kraus, William ^a,b   Demark Wahnefried, Wendy ^d  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMORBIDITY; DIET; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRUIT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; VEGETABLE; BREAST TUMOR; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERVENTION STUDY; KINESIOTHERAPY; LIFESTYLE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NORTH AMERICA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSTATE TUMOR; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGISTER; RISK; SELF CONCEPT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURVIVOR;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIET; EXERCISE; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORTH AMERICA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REGISTRIES; RISK; SELF EFFICACY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURVIVORS;

EID: 52649155612     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0705     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beskow LM, Sandler RS, Weinberger M. Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues. Am J Public Health 2006;96:1920-6.
2. Fost NF, Levine RJ. The dysregulation of human subjects research. JAMA 2007;298:2196-8.
3. Elting LS, Cooksley C, Bekele BN, et al. Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipants. Cancer 2006;106:2452-8.
4. Beskow LM, Millikan RC, Sandler RS, Godley PA, Weiner BJ, Weinberger M. The effect of physician permission versus notification on research recruitment through cancer registries (United States). Cancer Causes Contr 2006;17:315-23.
5. Scholle SH, Peele PB, Kelleher KJ, Frank E, Jansen-McWilliams L, Kupfer D. Effect of different recruitment sources on the composition of a bipolar disorder case registry. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000;35:220-7.
6. Newlin K, Melkus GD, Jefferson V, Langerman S, Womack J, Chyun D. Recruitment of black women with type 2 diabetes into a self-management intervention trial. Ethn Dis 2006;16:956-62.
7. Appel LJ, Vollmer WM, Obarzanek E, et al. Recruitment and baseline characteristics of participants in the dietary approaches to stop hypertension trial. J Am Diet Assoc 1999;99:S69-75.
8. Ries LA, Harkins D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2003. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2006.
9. Lee OY, Fitzgerald LZ, Naliboff B, et al. Impact of advertisement and clinic populations in symptoms and perception of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;13:1631-8.
10. Henrikson, NB, Harris JN, Bowen DJ. Predictors of self-referral into a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:1387-92.
11. Binks M, O'Neil PM. Referral sources to a weight management program. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:596-603.
12. Apodaca TR, Miller WR. A Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bibliotherapy for alcohol problems. J Clin Psychol 2003;59:289-304.
13. Demark-Wahnefried W, Clipp EC, McBride C, et al. Design of FRESH START: a randomized trial of exercise and diet among cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:415-24.
14. Demark-Wahnefried W, Clipp EC, Lipkus IM, et al. Main outcomes of the FRESH START trial: a sequentially-tailored, diet and exercise, mailed print intervention among breast and prostate cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2709-19.
15. Blair S, Haskell W, Ho P, et al. Assessment of habitual physical activity by seven-day recall in a community and controlled experiments. Am J Epidemiol 1985;122:794-804.
16. Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V, et al. Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:1089-99.
17. Macri JM, Downs SM, Algoti S, Demark-Wahnefried W, Snyder DC, Lobach DF. A simplified approach to generating tailored questionnaires, health education messages and guideline recommendations. CIN Comput Inform Nurs 2005;23:316-21.
18. Demark-Wahnefried W. Tailoring print material interventions that make a difference: approaches used in the FRESH START trial to improve cancer survivors' dietary and exercise practices. Nutr Today 2007;42:131-8.
19. Stull VB, Snyder DC, Demark-Wahnefried W. Lifestyle interventions in cancer survivors: designing programs that meet the needs of this vulnerable and growing population. J Nutr 2007;137(1 Suppl):243-8S.