Signposts along the NIH roadmap for reengineering clinical research: Lessons from the clinical research networks initiative

Archives of Internal Medicine

Volumn 168, Issue 17, 2008, Pages 1919-1925

  Williams, Robert L ^a   Johnson, Stephen B ^b   Greene, Sarah M ^c   Larson, Eric B ^c   Green, Lee A ^d   Morris, Alan ^e   Confer, Dennis ^f   Reaman, Gregory ^g   Madigan, Rosemary ^h   Kahn, James ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM   (United States)

^g GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELECONFERENCE;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); RESEARCH DESIGN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 52649120884     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: 15383679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.17.1919     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Zerhouni EA. US biomedical research: basic, translational, and clinical sciences. JAMA. 2005;294(11):1352-1358.
2. Sung NS, Crowley WF Jr, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003;289(10):1278-1287.
3. Office of Portfolio Analysis and Strategic Initiatives (OPASI). NIH roadmap for medical research: overview of the NIH roadmap. http://nihroadmap. nih.gov/overview.asp. Accessed March 3, 2008.
4. Office of Portfolio Analysis and Strategic Initiatives (OPASI). NIH roadmap for medical research: re-engineering the clinical research enterprise: Clinical Research Networks and NECTAR. http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/ clinicalresearch/overview-networks.asp. Accessed March 3, 2008.
5. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR). NIH roadmap for biomedical research: Inventory and Evaluation of Clinical Research Networks (IECRN): Westat, 2005-2007. https://www.clinicalresearchnetworks.org/srchnet.asp. Accessed March 3, 2008.
6. Committee on Enhancing the Internet for Health Applications: Technical Requirements and Implementation Strategies; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications; National Research Council. Networking Health: Prescriptions for the Internet. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
7. Payne PR, Johnson SB, Starren JB, Tilson HH, Dowdy D. Breaking the translational barriers: the value of integrating biomedical informatics and translational research. J Investig Med. 2005;53(4):192-200.
8. Panko WB, Erhardt-Domino K, Pletcher T, Wilson W. Networking: an overview for leaders of academic medical centers. Acad Med. 1993;68(7):528-532.
9. Morse SS. Global infectious disease surveillance and health intelligence. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(4):1069-1077.
10. Frohlich J, Karp S, Smith MD, Sujansky W. Retrospective: lessons learned from the Santa Barbara project and their implications for health information exchange. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(5):w589-w591.
11. Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Krupinski EA, et al. Integrating telemedicine and telehealth: putting it all together. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;131:23-38.
12. Murnik M, Randal F, Guevara M, Skipper B, Kaufman A. Web-based primary care referral program associated with reduced emergency department utilization. Fam Med. 2006;38(3):185-189.
13. Green LA, Hickner J. A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(1):1-10.
14. Health Level 7 Inc. About HL7. http://www.hl7.org/. Accessed March 3, 2008.
15. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. About caBIG. https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/overview/. Accessed March 3, 2008.
16. Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium Inc. http://www.cdisc.org/ . Accessed March 3, 2008.
17. Boyd AD, Hosner C, Hunscher DA, Athey BD, Clauw DJ, Green LA. An 'honest broker' mechanism to maintain privacy for patient care and academic medical research. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(5-6):407-411.
18. Hornbrook MC, Hart G, Ellis JL, et al. Building a virtual cancer research organization. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;(35):12-25.
19. Peterson KA, Fontaine P, Speedie S. The Electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN): a new era in practice-based research. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(1):93-97.
20. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organization. Our standards: SNOMED CT. http://www.ihtsdo.org/our-standards/. Accessed March 3, 2008.
21. Lasker RD, Weiss ES, Miller R. Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):179-205.
22. Kukafka R, Johnson SB, Linfante A, Allegrante JP. Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: a systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36(3):218-227.
23. National Library of Medicine. Unified Medical Language System. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/. Accessed March 3, 2008.
24. El Ansari W, Phillips CJ, Hammick M. Collaboration and partnerships: developing the evidence base. Health Soc Care Community. 2001;9(4):215-227.
25. Mattessich PW, Murray-Close M, Monsey BR. Collaboration: What Makes It Work. 2nd ed. St Paul, MN: Fieldstone Alliance; 2001.
26. The New York Academy of Medicine, Center for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health. Home page. http://www.cacsh.org/index.html. Accessed March 3, 2008.
27. Rahman A. Personal views: why do collaborative research? BMJ. 2007;335(7614):304.
28. Hock D; Visa International. Birth of the Chaordic Age. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 1999.