Detection of in vitro proximal caries in storage phosphor plate radiographs scanned with different resolutions

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 325-329

  Li, G ^a,b   Berkhout, W E R ^b   Sanderink, G C H ^b   Martins, M ^c   Van Der Stelt, P F ^b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Approximal caries; Caries; Computer assisted; Image processing; Image resolution; Radiology, dental, digital

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIST; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STORAGE PHOSPHOR PLATE RADIOGRAPH; X RAY FILM;

ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 52649119766     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/62591340     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Smith SW (ed). The scientist and engineer's guide to digital signal processing. San Diego, CA: California Technical Publishing, 1997, pp 423-431.
2. White SC, Pharoah MJ (eds). Oral radiology: principle and interpretation. (4th edn). St Louis, MO: Mosby Inc., 1999; pp 79-82.
3. Swets JA. ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 1979; 14: 109-121.
4. Prapayasatok S, Janhom A, Verochana K, Pramojanee S. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 253-257.
5. Sanderink GCH, Huiskens R, van der Stelt PF, Welander US, Stheeman SE. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78: 125-132.
6. Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GCH, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 312-318.
7. Kitagawa H, Farman AG, Scheetz JP, Brown WP, Lewis J, Benefiel M, et al. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 272-276.
8. Vandre RH, Pajak JC, Abdel-Nabi H, Farman TT, Farman AG. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 216-222.
9. Paurazas SB, Geist JR, Pink FE, Hoen MM, Steiman HR. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radilo Endod 2000; 89: 356-362.
10. Shearer AC, Mullane E, Macfarlane TV, Grondahl HG, Horner K. Three phosphor plate systems and film compared for imaging root canals. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 275-279.
11. Hintze H, Wenzel A. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries: A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 44-49.
12. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 170-175.
13. Jacobsen JH, Hansen B, Wenzel A, Hintze H. Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesions depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems. Caries Res 2004; 38: 34-38.
14. Farman AG, Farman TT. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 485-489.
15. Zeller U. Technical artifacts in scaled images on computer displays. In: The 9th European Congress of DentoMaxillofacial Radiology (abstract). 2004; 40.
16. Berkhout WE, Beuger DA, Sanderink GC, Stelt PF van der. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 1-5.